-
Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006)
0.01
0.009721208 = product of:
0.068048455 = sum of:
0.061167482 = weight(_text_:representation in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061167482 = score(doc=4641,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.5282854 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an overview of the work in progress at the W3C to produce a standard conversion of WordNet to the RDF/OWL representation language in use in the SemanticWeb community. Such a standard representation is useful to provide application developers a high-quality resource and to promote interoperability. Important requirements in this conversion process are that it should be complete and should stay close to WordNet's conceptual model. The paper explains the steps taken to produce the conversion and details design decisions such as the composition of the class hierarchy and properties, the addition of suitable OWL semantics and the chosen format of the URIs. Additional topics include a strategy to incorporate OWL and RDFS semantics in one schema such that both RDF(S) infrastructure and OWL infrastructure can interpret the information correctly, problems encountered in understanding the Prolog source files and the description of the two versions that are provided (Basic and Full) to accommodate different usages of WordNet.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010)
0.01
0.0073820096 = product of:
0.051674064 = sum of:
0.04708675 = weight(_text_:representation in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04708675 = score(doc=4639,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.004587315 = product of:
0.013761944 = sum of:
0.013761944 = weight(_text_:29 in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013761944 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This thesis focuses on conversion of vocabularies for representation and integration of collections on the Semantic Web. A secondary focus is how to represent metadata schemas (RDF Schemas representing metadata element sets) such that they interoperate with vocabularies. The primary domain in which we operate is that of cultural heritage collections. The background worldview in which a solution is sought is that of the Semantic Web research paradigmwith its associated theories, methods, tools and use cases. In other words, we assume the SemanticWeb is in principle able to provide the context to realize interoperable collections. Interoperability is dependent on the interplay between representations and the applications that use them. We mean applications in the widest sense, such as "search" and "annotation". These applications or tasks are often present in software applications, such as the E-Culture application. It is therefore necessary that applications requirements on the vocabulary representation are met. This leads us to formulate the following problem statement: HOW CAN EXISTING VOCABULARIES BE MADE AVAILABLE TO SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS?
We refine the problem statement into three research questions. The first two focus on the problem of conversion of a vocabulary to a Semantic Web representation from its original format. Conversion of a vocabulary to a representation in a Semantic Web language is necessary to make the vocabulary available to SemanticWeb applications. In the last question we focus on integration of collection metadata schemas in a way that allows for vocabulary representations as produced by our methods. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004)
0.01
0.0070326724 = product of:
0.049228705 = sum of:
0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200902 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.008027801 = product of:
0.024083402 = sum of:
0.024083402 = weight(_text_:29 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024083402 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a method for converting existing thesauri and related resources from their native format to RDF(S) and OWL. The method identifies four steps in the conversion process. In each step, decisions have to be taken with respect to the syntax or semantics of the resulting representation. Each step is supported through a number of guidelines. The method is illustrated through conversions of two large thesauri: MeSH and WordNet.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.01
0.006028005 = product of:
0.04219603 = sum of:
0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03531506 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.00
0.0019571495 = product of:
0.027400091 = sum of:
0.027400091 = product of:
0.041100137 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.02045722 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02045722 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006)
0.00
4.9149804E-4 = product of:
0.006880972 = sum of:
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van; Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schreiber, G.: Two variations on ontology alignment evaluation : methodological issues (2008)
0.00
4.9149804E-4 = product of:
0.006880972 = sum of:
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4645)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Schreiber, G.; Amin, A.; Assem, M. van; Boer, V. de; Hardman, L.; Hildebrand, M.; Omelayenko, B.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.; Tordai, A.; Aroyoa, L.: Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections : the MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator (2008)
0.00
4.9149804E-4 = product of:
0.006880972 = sum of:
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Schreiber, G.; Amin, A.; Assem, M. van; Boer, V. de; Hardman, L.; Hildebrand, M.; Hollink, L.; Huang, Z.; Kersen, J. van; Niet, M. de; Omelayenko, B.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Siebes, R.; Taekema, J.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator (2006)
0.00
4.9149804E-4 = product of:
0.006880972 = sum of:
0.006880972 = product of:
0.020642916 = sum of:
0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020642916 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Koenderink, N.J.J.P.; Assem, M. van; Hulzebos, J.L.; Broekstra, J.; Top, J.L.: ROC: a method for proto-ontology construction by domain experts (2008)
0.00
4.0958173E-4 = product of:
0.005734144 = sum of:
0.005734144 = product of:
0.017202431 = sum of:
0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017202431 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Assem, M. van; Rijgersberg, H.; Wigham, M.; Top, J.: Converting and annotating quantitative data tables (2010)
0.00
4.0958173E-4 = product of:
0.005734144 = sum of:
0.005734144 = product of:
0.017202431 = sum of:
0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017202431 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
