-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.0129082 = product of:
0.09035739 = sum of:
0.082401805 = weight(_text_:representation in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082401805 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.007955586 = product of:
0.023866756 = sum of:
0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023866756 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Priss, U.: ¬A semiotic-conceptual framework for knowledge representation (2004)
0.01
0.010823621 = product of:
0.07576535 = sum of:
0.06659072 = weight(_text_:representation in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06659072 = score(doc=2630,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.00917463 = product of:
0.027523888 = sum of:
0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027523888 = score(doc=2630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper argues that a semiotic-conceptual framework is suitable for knowledge representation because it combines conceptual structures with semiotic aspects. The advantages of such a framework are discussed and explained using an example from an ontology language.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:12:21
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.009712365 = product of:
0.067986555 = sum of:
0.061167482 = weight(_text_:representation in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061167482 = score(doc=2655,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.5282854 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.006819073 = product of:
0.02045722 = sum of:
0.02045722 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02045722 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.009460352 = product of:
0.06622247 = sum of:
0.058266878 = weight(_text_:representation in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058266878 = score(doc=5095,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.007955586 = product of:
0.023866756 = sum of:
0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023866756 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000)
0.00
0.0029429218 = product of:
0.041200902 = sum of:
0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200902 = score(doc=6055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
-
Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998)
0.00
0.0029429218 = product of:
0.041200902 = sum of:
0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200902 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
-
Priss, U.: Alternatives to the "Semantic Web" : multi-strategy knowledge representation (2003)
0.00
0.00237824 = product of:
0.03329536 = sum of:
0.03329536 = weight(_text_:representation in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03329536 = score(doc=2733,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.28756213 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006)
0.00
0.0013106616 = product of:
0.01834926 = sum of:
0.01834926 = product of:
0.055047777 = sum of:
0.055047777 = weight(_text_:29 in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055047777 = score(doc=4305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.025165197 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:29:59
