Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Priss, U."
  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.0129082 = product of:
      0.09035739 = sum of:
        0.082401805 = weight(_text_:representation in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082401805 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  2. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01
    0.009460352 = product of:
      0.06622247 = sum of:
        0.058266878 = weight(_text_:representation in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058266878 = score(doc=5095,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  3. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.00
    0.0029429218 = product of:
      0.041200902 = sum of:
        0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041200902 = score(doc=6055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
  4. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.00
    0.0029429218 = product of:
      0.041200902 = sum of:
        0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041200902 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
  5. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006) 0.00
    0.0013106616 = product of:
      0.01834926 = sum of:
        0.01834926 = product of:
          0.055047777 = sum of:
            0.055047777 = weight(_text_:29 in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055047777 = score(doc=4305,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:29:59