Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- lcsh's%3a%22Husserl%2c edmund %2f 1859 %2f 1938 %3b phenomenology %3b mental representation %3b intentionality %28Philosophy%29%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%22Husserl%2c edmund %2f 1859 %2f 1908 %3b phenomenology %3b mental representation %3b intentionality %28Philosophy%29%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%22Husserl%2c edmund %2f 1859 %2f 1938 %3b phenomenology %3b mentale representation %3b intentionality %28Philosophy%29%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%22Husserl%2c edmund %2f 1859 %2f 1938 %3b phenomenoloy %3b mental representation %3b intentionality %28Philosophy%29%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%22Husserl%2c edmunds %2f 1859 %2f 1938 %3b phenomenology %3b mental representation %3b intentionality %28Philosophy%29%22 2
-
Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998)
0.00
0.0033633395 = product of: 0.04708675 = sum of: 0.04708675 = weight(_text_:representation in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.04708675 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of: 0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of: 4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218) 0.025165197 = queryNorm 0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Since the 'Science Citation Index' emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. Discusses the citation representation of science: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy
-
Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015)
0.00
4.0589727E-4 = product of: 0.0056825615 = sum of: 0.0056825615 = product of: 0.017047685 = sum of: 0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.017047685 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of: 0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.025165197 = queryNorm 0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
Authors
- Costas, R. 1
- Zahedi, Z. 1