Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 2: comparison task and conclusions (2010) 0.01
    0.01037836 = product of:
      0.14529704 = sum of:
        0.14529704 = weight(_text_:mental in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14529704 = score(doc=4146,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.8839008 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to provide some insight into mental models of the bibliographic universe and how they compare with functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) as a conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. Design/methodology/approach - To get a more complete picture of the mental models, different elicitation techniques were used. The three tasks of the paper were: card-sorting, concept mapping and comparison task. The paper deals with comparison task, which consisted of interviews and rankings, and provides a discussion of the results of the paper as a whole. Findings - Results of the ranking part of the comparison task confirm the findings of concept mapping task. In both cases, while there are individual differences between mental models, on average they gravitate towards FRBR. Research limitations/implications - This is a small study and it provides only a glimpse of the implications of using FRBR as a conceptual basis for cataloguing. More FRBR-related user studies are needed, including similar studies on different groups of individuals and different types of materials, as well as practical studies of user needs and user interfaces. Practical implications - The results of this study are the first user-tested indication of the validity of FRBR as a conceptual basis for the future of cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first published paper of mental models of the bibliographic universe and uses a unique combination of mental model elicitation techniques.
  2. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: How do non-librarians see the bibliographic universe? (2008) 0.01
    0.008806332 = product of:
      0.12328864 = sum of:
        0.12328864 = weight(_text_:mental in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12328864 = score(doc=2501,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.7500148 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is a relatively new conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. While it is recognized among library experts, there is a considerable lack of user studies. A pilot study, consisting of three different tasks, was conducted to test the instruments for acquiring mental models of the bibliographic universe. Results show that users do not have a consistent mental model of the bibliographic universe and that various techniques used can be useful for acquiring individuals' mental models of the bibliographic universe. Of the three tasks, the one asking people to rank pairs of similar item according to substitutability revealed results that were closest to FRBR, while card sorting and concept mapping exercises failed to provide a single alternative model.
  3. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 1: mental models of descriptions (2010) 0.01
    0.008473896 = product of:
      0.118634544 = sum of:
        0.118634544 = weight(_text_:mental in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118634544 = score(doc=4145,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.72170204 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to present the results of the first two tasks of a user study looking into mental models of the bibliographic universe and especially their comparison to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model, which has not yet been user tested. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employes a combination of techniques for eliciting mental models and consisted of three tasks, two of which, card sorting and concept mapping, are presented herein. Its participants were 30 individuals residing in the general area of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Findings - Cumulative results of concept mapping show a strong resemblance to FRBR. Card sorts did not produce conclusive results. In both tasks, participants paid special attention to the original expression, indicating that a special place for it should be considered. Research limitations/implications - The study was performed using a relatively small sample of participants living in a geographically limited space using relatively straight-forward examples. Practical implications - Some solid evidence is provided for adoption of FRBR as the conceptual basis for cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first widely published user study of FRBR, applying novel methodological approaches in the field of Library and Information Science.
  4. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.01
    0.008473896 = product of:
      0.118634544 = sum of:
        0.118634544 = weight(_text_:mental in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118634544 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.72170204 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  5. Budanovic, M.P.; Zumer, M.: ¬The catalogers' thought process : a comparison of formal and informal context (2018) 0.01
    0.005931727 = product of:
      0.08304418 = sum of:
        0.08304418 = weight(_text_:mental in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08304418 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.50519145 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is to analyze how catalogers describe publications without cataloging tools in comparison with the current cataloging process. A total of 46 catalogers took part in the first study, a free description of monographic publications, while 30 catalogers performed original cataloging in their actual environment. A combination of observations and think-aloud protocols was used for data gathering in both studies. The focus was on Slovenian catalogers from different types and sizes of libraries. Results revealed both differences and similarities between catalogers' mental models in the respective studies.
  6. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: User verification of the FRBR conceptual model (2012) 0.00
    0.004236948 = product of:
      0.059317272 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to build on of a previous study of mental models of the bibliographic universe, which found that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model is intuitive. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 120 participants were presented with a list of bibliographic entities and six graphs each. They were asked to choose the graph they thought best represented the relationships between entities described. Findings - The graph based on the FRBR model was chosen by more than half of the participants and none of the alternatives stood out. This gives further indication that FRBR is an appropriate model of the bibliographic universe from users' standpoint. Research limitations/implications - The study only looked at the textual part of the bibliographic universe. Further research is needed for other types of materials. Practical implications - This research suggests that there should be a more positive attitude towards implementation of FRBR-based catalogues. Originality/value - This is one of only a handful of user studies relating to FRBR, which looks to be the backbone of catalogues for years to come. As such, the results should be of interest to everybody involved with catalogues, from cataloguers to the end-users.
  7. Brito, M(arcilio), de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.; Brito, M(arcos), de: Document representation with images : an experimental milestone (2018) 0.00
    0.0033633395 = product of:
      0.04708675 = sum of:
        0.04708675 = weight(_text_:representation in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04708675 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  8. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003) 0.00
    0.0029429218 = product of:
      0.041200902 = sum of:
        0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041200902 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  9. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modeling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.00
    0.0021020873 = product of:
      0.02942922 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
  10. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modelling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.00
    0.0021020873 = product of:
      0.02942922 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=4828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
  11. Takhirov, N.; Aalberg, T.; Duchateau, F.; Zumer, M.: FRBR-ML: a FRBR-based framework for semantic interoperability (2012) 0.00
    0.0016816697 = product of:
      0.023543375 = sum of:
        0.023543375 = weight(_text_:representation in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023543375 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.20333713 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata related to cultural items such as literature, music and movies is a valuable resource that is currently exploited in many applications and services based on semantic web technologies. A vast amount of such information has been created by memory institutions in the last decades using different standard or ad hoc schemas, and a main challenge is to make this legacy data accessible as reusable semantic data. On one hand, this is a syntactic problem that can be solved by transforming to formats that are compatible with the tools and services used for semantic aware services. On the other hand, this is a semantic problem. Simply transforming from one format to another does not automatically enable semantic interoperability and legacy data often needs to be reinterpreted as well as transformed. The conceptual model in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, initially developed as a conceptual framework for library standards and systems, is a major step towards a shared semantic model of the products of artistic and intellectual endeavor of mankind. The model is generally accepted as sufficiently generic to serve as a conceptual framework for a broad range of cultural heritage metadata. Unfortunately, the existing large body of legacy data makes a transition to this model difficult. For instance, most bibliographic data is still only available in various MARC-based formats which is hard to render into reusable and meaningful semantic data. Making legacy bibliographic data accessible as semantic data is a complex problem that includes interpreting and transforming the information. In this article, we present our work on transforming and enhancing legacy bibliographic information into a representation where the structure and semantics of the FRBR model is explicit.
  12. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.00
    9.7415334E-4 = product of:
      0.013638146 = sum of:
        0.013638146 = product of:
          0.04091444 = sum of:
            0.04091444 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04091444 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.00
    6.8883057E-4 = product of:
      0.009643627 = sum of:
        0.009643627 = product of:
          0.02893088 = sum of:
            0.02893088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02893088 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  14. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.00
    6.553308E-4 = product of:
      0.00917463 = sum of:
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:13:13
  15. Brito, M. de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.: Indexing with images : the imagetic conceptual methodology (2016) 0.00
    6.553308E-4 = product of:
      0.00917463 = sum of:
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  16. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬The new FRBR-LRM model : some accents (2016) 0.00
    6.553308E-4 = product of:
      0.00917463 = sum of:
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.00
    5.7402544E-4 = product of:
      0.0080363555 = sum of:
        0.0080363555 = product of:
          0.024109066 = sum of:
            0.024109066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024109066 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.00
    5.734144E-4 = product of:
      0.008027801 = sum of:
        0.008027801 = product of:
          0.024083402 = sum of:
            0.024083402 = weight(_text_:29 in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024083402 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:26:29
  19. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.00
    5.734144E-4 = product of:
      0.008027801 = sum of:
        0.008027801 = product of:
          0.024083402 = sum of:
            0.024083402 = weight(_text_:29 in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024083402 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    28. 6.2021 19:29:58
  20. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.00
    5.6825613E-4 = product of:
      0.007955586 = sum of:
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22