Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Hughes, B.; Wareham, J.; Joshi, I.: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority : how predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models (2010) 0.00
    0.004236948 = product of:
      0.059317272 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=3417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Literature examining information judgments and Internet search behaviors notes a number of major research gaps, including how users actually make these judgments outside of experiments or researcher-defined tasks, and how search behavior is impacted by a user's judgment of online information. Using the medical setting, where doctors face real consequences in applying the information found, we examine how information judgments employed by doctors to mitigate risk impact their cognitive search. Diaries encompassing 444 real clinical information search incidents, combined with semistructured interviews across 35 doctors, were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results show that doctors, though aware of the need for information quality and cognitive authority, rarely make evaluative judgments. This is explained by navigational bias in information searches and via predictive judgments that favor known sites where doctors perceive levels of information quality and cognitive authority. Doctors' mental models of the Internet sites and Web experience relevant to the task type enable these predictive judgments. These results suggest a model connecting online cognitive search and information judgment literatures. Moreover, this implies a need to understand cognitive search through longitudinal- or learning-based views for repeated search tasks, and adaptations to medical practitioner training and tools for online search.
  2. Cleverley, P.H.; Burnett, S.; Muir, L.: Exploratory information searching in the enterprise : a study of user satisfaction and task performance (2017) 0.00
    0.004236948 = product of:
      0.059317272 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=3319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    No prior research has been identified that investigates the causal factors for workplace exploratory search task performance. The impact of user, task, and environmental factors on user satisfaction and task performance was investigated through a mixed methods study with 26 experienced information professionals using enterprise search in an oil and gas enterprise. Some participants found 75% of high-value items, others found none, with an average of 27%. No association was found between self-reported search expertise and task performance, with a tendency for many participants to overestimate their search expertise. Successful searchers may have more accurate mental models of both search systems and the information space. Organizations may not have effective exploratory search task performance feedback loops, a lack of learning. This may be caused by management bias towards technology, not capability, a lack of systems thinking. Furthermore, organizations may not "know" they "don't know" their true level of search expertise, a lack of knowing. A metamodel is presented identifying the causal factors for workplace exploratory search task performance. Semistructured qualitative interviews with search staff from the defense, pharmaceutical, and aerospace sectors indicates the potential transferability of the finding that organizations may not know their search expertise levels.
  3. LaBarre, K.A.; Tilley, C.L.: ¬The elusive tale : leveraging the study of information seeking and knowledge organization to improve access to and discovery of folktales (2012) 0.00
    0.0021020873 = product of:
      0.02942922 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The "Folktales and Facets" project proposes ways to enhance access to folktales-in written and audiovisual formats-through the systematic and rigorous development of user-focused and task-focused models of information representation. Methods used include cognitive task analysis and facet analysis to better understand the information-seeking and information-use practices of people working with folktales and the intellectual dimensions of the domain. Interviews were conducted with 9 informants, representing scholars, storytellers, and teachers who rely on folktales in their professional lives to determine common tasks across user groups. Four tasks were identified: collect, create, instruct, and study. Facet analysis was conducted on the transcripts of these interviews, and a representative set of literature that included subject indexing material and a random stratified set of document surrogates drawn from a collection of folktales, including bibliographic records, introductions, reviews, tables of contents, and bibliographies. Eight facets were identified as most salient for this group of users: agent, association, context, documentation, location, subject, time, and viewpoint. Implications include the need for systems designers to devise methods for harvesting and integrating extant contextual material into search and discovery systems, and to take into account user-desired features in the development of enhanced services for digital repositories.
  4. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.00
    0.001967214 = product of:
      0.027540997 = sum of:
        0.027540997 = product of:
          0.041311495 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
            0.024109066 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024109066 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  5. Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011) 0.00
    0.0018452184 = product of:
      0.025833055 = sum of:
        0.025833055 = product of:
          0.038749583 = sum of:
            0.019462328 = weight(_text_:29 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019462328 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.21985546 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
            0.019287253 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019287253 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:20:22
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  6. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.00
    8.1179454E-4 = product of:
      0.011365123 = sum of:
        0.011365123 = product of:
          0.03409537 = sum of:
            0.03409537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409537 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  7. Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013) 0.00
    6.8883057E-4 = product of:
      0.009643627 = sum of:
        0.009643627 = product of:
          0.02893088 = sum of:
            0.02893088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02893088 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 19:00:02
  8. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.00
    6.494356E-4 = product of:
      0.009092098 = sum of:
        0.009092098 = product of:
          0.027276294 = sum of:
            0.027276294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027276294 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  9. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.00
    5.6825613E-4 = product of:
      0.007955586 = sum of:
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  10. Aharony, N.: Information literacy in the professional literature : an exploratory analysis (2010) 0.00
    4.9149804E-4 = product of:
      0.006880972 = sum of:
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 3937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=3937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3937)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:42:42
  11. Menou, M.J.: Information behaviour of the "Google generation" as a factor in sustainability for Mexican cities (2010) 0.00
    4.9149804E-4 = product of:
      0.006880972 = sum of:
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 3955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=3955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:37:20
  12. Savolainen, R.: Information-seeking processes as temporal developments : comparison of stage-based and cyclic approaches (2018) 0.00
    4.9149804E-4 = product of:
      0.006880972 = sum of:
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 4253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=4253,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4253, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4253)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2018 13:29:10
  13. Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018) 0.00
    4.8707667E-4 = product of:
      0.006819073 = sum of:
        0.006819073 = product of:
          0.02045722 = sum of:
            0.02045722 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02045722 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:33:22
  14. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.00
    4.8707667E-4 = product of:
      0.006819073 = sum of:
        0.006819073 = product of:
          0.02045722 = sum of:
            0.02045722 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02045722 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
  15. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking (2014) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:08:31
  16. Beheshti, J.; Cole, C.; Abuhimed, D.; Lamoureux, I.: Tracking middle school students' information behavior via Kuhlthau's ISP Model : temporality (2015) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 1819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=1819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1819)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:49:29
  17. Lemke, M.: Wie lernwirksam sind Online-Tutorials? : Lernerfolgskontrolle und Evaluation bibliothekarischer E-Learningangebote (2014) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    17.12.2015 14:10:29
  18. Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The influence of Taylor's paper, Question-Negotiation and Information-Seeking in Libraries (2013) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Taylor, R.S.: Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. In: College and research libraries. 29(1968) no.3, S.178-194.
  19. Montesi, M.; Álvarez Bornstein, B.: Defining a theoretical framework for information seeking and parenting : concepts and themes from a study with mothers supportive of attachment parenting (2017) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 3544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=3544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3544)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2017 17:30:29
  20. Le, L.T.; Shah, C.: Retrieving people : identifying potential answerers in Community Question-Answering (2018) 0.00
    4.0958173E-4 = product of:
      0.005734144 = sum of:
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 4467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=4467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4467)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 13:18:09

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 8

Types

  • a 26
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…