Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"p"
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.06
    0.057812307 = product of:
      0.26979077 = sum of:
        0.029976752 = product of:
          0.11990701 = sum of:
            0.11990701 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.11990701 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.11990701 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Jaenecke, P.: Knowledge organization due to theory formation (1995) 0.01
    0.010823621 = product of:
      0.07576535 = sum of:
        0.06659072 = weight(_text_:representation in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06659072 = score(doc=3751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Theory formation is regarded as a process of domain-internal knowledge organization. Misunderstandings about the concept 'theory' are explained. A theory is considered as a systematical representation of a domain realized by three closely related theory-forming actions: establishment of a suitable system of basic concepts, ordering of the experience or given experimental results, synthesizing of conflicting hypotheses. In this view, theory formation means an ambitious kind of knowledge representation. Its consequences are summarized and its importance for the human sciences and for society is emphasized
    Date
    29. 3.1996 17:26:47
  3. Panzer, M.: Ontological representation of the DDC : Brainstorming, May 6th 2008 (2008) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  4. Lehmann, F.: Semiosis complicates high-level ontology (2000) 0.00
    0.0025225044 = product of:
      0.03531506 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    For automated question-answering, natural-language understanding, semantic integration of different databases/standards/thesauri/etc., you need a big complicated ontology of concepts and a logical language to combine them. Cyc (www.cyc.com) is such a system. It's good for your upper ontology to be systematic and clear, One way is to have a small number of well-defined distinctions at the top, by which all more specific concepts are partitioned. This is a system of "factors", or "facets" in Ranganathan's sense Iyer 1995) much like Aristotle's "differentia" in his "categories", as promoted in John Sowa's "ontological crystal". Practical considerations have driven Cyc's builders to mess up the neatness of such upper divisions. In particular, the simplicity of some very high "factors" is confounded, for practical use, by the occurrence in our world of semiosis and representation This talk will report on some of our experiences
  5. Lange, C.; Ion, P.; Dimou, A.; Bratsas, C.; Sperber, W.; Kohlhasel, M.; Antoniou, I.: Getting mathematics towards the Web of Data : the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification (2012) 0.00
    0.0021020873 = product of:
      0.02942922 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC), maintained by the American Mathematical Society's Mathematical Reviews (MR) and FIZ Karlsruhe's Zentralblatt für Mathematik (Zbl), is a scheme for classifying publications in mathematics according to their subjects. While it is widely used, its traditional, idiosyncratic conceptualization and representation requires custom implementations of search, query and annotation support. This did not encourage people to create and explore connections of mathematics to subjects of related domains (e.g. science), and it made the scheme hard to maintain. We have reimplemented the current version of MSC2010 as a Linked Open Dataset using SKOS and our focus is concentrated on turning it into the new MSC authority. This paper explains the motivation, and details of our design considerations and how we realized them in the implementation. We present in-the-field use cases and point out how e-science applications can take advantage of the MSC LOD set. We conclude with a roadmap for bootstrapping the presence of mathematical and mathematics-based science, technology, and engineering knowledge on the Web of Data, where it has been noticeably underrepresented so far, starting from MSC/SKOS as a seed.
  6. Peponakis, M.; Mastora, A.; Kapidakis, S.; Doerr, M.: Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) : an analysis of concepts and relations (2020) 0.00
    0.0021020873 = product of:
      0.02942922 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.
  7. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.00
    0.0013776611 = product of:
      0.019287255 = sum of:
        0.019287255 = product of:
          0.05786176 = sum of:
            0.05786176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05786176 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  8. Elazar, D.H.: ¬The making of a classification scheme for libraries of Judaica (2000) 0.00
    9.829961E-4 = product of:
      0.013761944 = sum of:
        0.013761944 = product of:
          0.04128583 = sum of:
            0.04128583 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04128583 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    1.11.2000 14:55:29
  9. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.00
    9.829961E-4 = product of:
      0.013761944 = sum of:
        0.013761944 = product of:
          0.04128583 = sum of:
            0.04128583 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04128583 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  10. Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996) 0.00
    8.1179454E-4 = product of:
      0.011365123 = sum of:
        0.011365123 = product of:
          0.03409537 = sum of:
            0.03409537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409537 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1996 15:40:22
  11. Schöneberg, U.; Gödert, W.: Erschließung mathematischer Publikationen mittels linguistischer Verfahren (2012) 0.00
    4.9149804E-4 = product of:
      0.006880972 = sum of:
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    12. 9.2013 12:29:05
  12. Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020) 0.00
    4.9149804E-4 = product of:
      0.006880972 = sum of:
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 11:29:00
  13. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.00
    4.0589727E-4 = product of:
      0.0056825615 = sum of:
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22