Search (161 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Couvering, E. van: ¬The economy of navigation : search engines, search optimisation and search results (2007) 0.01
    0.014937696 = product of:
      0.10456387 = sum of:
        0.09645457 = weight(_text_:phenomenology in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645457 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20961581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4601493 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
        0.008109303 = product of:
          0.02432791 = sum of:
            0.02432791 = weight(_text_:29 in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02432791 = score(doc=379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The political economy of communication focuses critically on what structural issues in mass media - ownership, labour practices, professional ethics, and so on - mean for products of those mass media and thus for society more generally. In the case of new media, recent political economic studies have looked at the technical infrastructure of the Internet and also at Internet usage. However, political economic studies of internet content are only beginning. Recent studies on the phenomenology of the Web, that is, the way the Web is experienced from an individual user's perspective, highlight the centrality of the search engine to most users' experiences of the Web, particularly when they venture beyond familiar Web sites. Search engines are therefore an obvi ous place to begin the analysis of Web content. An important assumption of this chapter is that internet search engines are media businesses and that the tools developed in media studies can be profitably brought to bear on them. This focus on search engine as industry comes from the critical tradition of the political economy of communications in rejecting the notion that the market alone should be the arbiter of the structure of the media industry, as might be appropriate for other types of products.
    Date
    13. 5.2007 10:29:29
  2. López-Huertas, M.J.; Barité Roqueta, M.-G.: Knowledge representation and organization of gender studies on the Internet : towards integration (2003) 0.01
    0.009227512 = product of:
      0.064592585 = sum of:
        0.05885844 = weight(_text_:representation in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05885844 = score(doc=2751,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.50834286 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This study analyzes the models of representation and organization of knowledge surrounding Gender. In addition to assessing their visibility, we analyze the thematic models and the conceptual treatment of Gender in search engine directories with wide coverage in different parts of the world. Eight seach engines were selected, two of them international (Yahoo, Google), one an international affiliate (Yahoo España), and five local ones (three from the Mercosur, and one apiece from Africa and Asia). The research was done an two levels: a) knowledge representation through the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the terms of Gender; b) knowledge organization, through the structural and semantic-conceptual analysis of the search engines. The results express a clear terminological and structural supremacy of the international search engines, as well a lack of correspondence overall among the terminologies, relative visibility, and diffusion of matters of Gender, leading to considerable difficulties in achieving consistent access to specific information.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 13:12:29
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  3. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01
    0.006019162 = product of:
      0.042134132 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
        0.006819073 = product of:
          0.02045722 = sum of:
            0.02045722 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02045722 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  4. Phipps, S.E.; Maloney, K.: Choices in the paradigm shift : where next for libraries? (2005) 0.01
    0.005931727 = product of:
      0.08304418 = sum of:
        0.08304418 = weight(_text_:mental in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08304418 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.50519145 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    External factors are forcing libraries to seriously evaluate and redefine their purpose within higher education. Libraries have identified themselves as gateways to information. Google, and other Internet search tools, have changed the need and importance of the gatekeeper role in libraries. The authors argue that libraries have a role that is broader than that of gatekeeper. It is necessary to move beyond our existing mental models and truly redefine our unique role based on the needs within the external environment. To develop this broader role, libraries must develop collaborative relationships and leverage existing tools and services.
  5. Becker, N.J.: Google in perspective: : understanding and enhancing student search skills (2003) 0.01
    0.005084338 = product of:
      0.07118073 = sum of:
        0.07118073 = weight(_text_:mental in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07118073 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.43302125 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper desctibes a study of undergraduate student search behavlour, examines the results through the lens of various disciplines, and provides now insights that will increase our understanding and facilitate the development of mom effetive instructional programmes Perspectives and research results drawn from multiple disciplines are used to explore the role of mental modele, reference groups and habits, and IntelIectual development in the search behaviour demonstrated by the undergraduate students. During interviews conducted as part of the study, many students were able to articulate the importance of source evaluation and describe electronically-appropriate methods for assessing the authority and reliability of Weh based information resources. In practice, however, these students frequently abandoned source evaluation altogether and, following the path of Ieast resistance, relied exclusively on basic Google searching, This approach both compromiscd the quality of their search results and contributed to frustration with the research process. This may not be extraordinarily unusual behaviour, but it is cause for considerable concern among Information literacy programme planners and Instructors. Discussion of the study results and related research is followed by pragmatic suggestions for modifylng ineffective search behaviour through emhanced instructional programmes
  6. Hoeber, O.; Yang, X.D.: Evaluating WordBars in exploratory Web search scenarios (2008) 0.01
    0.005023338 = product of:
      0.035163365 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Web searchers commonly have difficulties crafting queries to fulfill their information needs; even after they are able to craft a query, they often find it challenging to evaluate the results of their Web searches. Sources of these problems include the lack of support for constructing and refining queries, and the static nature of the list-based representations of Web search results. WordBars has been developed to assist users in their Web search and exploration tasks. This system provides a visual representation of the frequencies of the terms found in the first 100 document surrogates returned from an initial query, in the form of a histogram. Exploration of the search results is supported through term selection in the histogram, resulting in a re-sorting of the search results based on the use of the selected terms in the document surrogates. Terms from the histogram can be easily added or removed from the query, generating a new set of search results. Examples illustrate how WordBars can provide valuable support for query refinement and search results exploration, both when vague and specific initial queries are provided. User evaluations with both expert and intermediate Web searchers illustrate the benefits of the interactive exploration features of WordBars in terms of effectiveness as well as subjective measures. Although differences were found in the demographics of these two user groups, both were able to benefit from the features of WordBars.
    Date
    29. 7.2008 15:30:02
  7. Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006) 0.01
    0.005015969 = product of:
      0.03511178 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:14:12
  8. Kwok, S.H.; Yang, C.S.: Using the information seeker to elicit construct models for search engine evaluation (2004) 0.00
    0.004236948 = product of:
      0.059317272 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    With the rise of interactive search engines, direct access to information is available to the end user. Evaluation of these systems is clearly important for their comparison and development. From the perspective of the user engaged with the system in some information-seeking task, the range of relevant evaluation factors could be considerable. This article presents an investigation into the suitability of repertory grid technique eliciting a mental model of search engines in the user. Such a model comprises constructs held important to the user, which can be used to evaluate the system. The design of the repertory grid application is described and the data analyzed in two stages. The important issues in determining the suitability of the method are identified and the constructs are analyzed to determine their association, discriminatory ability, and clustering around a central overall rating. From this, it is concluded that repertory grid technique is appropriate for user-centered determination of evaluative constructs. Further analysis of the characteristics of the resulting construct set is undertaken towards establishing an underlying user model of the search engines, and further research is identified for its use in system evaluation.
  9. Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001) 0.00
    0.003940533 = product of:
      0.05516746 = sum of:
        0.05516746 = product of:
          0.082751185 = sum of:
            0.04865582 = weight(_text_:29 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04865582 = score(doc=6835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
            0.03409537 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409537 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1997 14:03:29
    11.11.2001 17:25:22
    Source
    Com!online. 2001, H.12, S.24-29
  10. Assadi, H.; Beauvisage, T.: ¬A comparative study of six french-speaking Web directories (2003) 0.00
    0.0035673599 = product of:
      0.049943037 = sum of:
        0.049943037 = weight(_text_:representation in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049943037 = score(doc=2723,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4313432 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a comparative study of six French-language Web directories (MSN, Nomade, Open Directory, Voila, Voila Pages Perso, and Yahoo). The study focuses an the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the organization of these directories, and an the way in which they describe sites. It reveals a wide variety of structures, content and organizational principles. In this respect, Web directories do not correspond to classic theories of classification. They highlight the difficulty of proposing a structured representation of the heterogeneous content of the Web.
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  11. Baeza-Yates, R.; Hurtado, C.; Mendoza, M.: Improving search engines by query clustering (2007) 0.00
    0.0029429218 = product of:
      0.041200902 = sum of:
        0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041200902 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a framework for clustering Web search engine queries whose aim is to identify groups of queries used to search for similar information on the Web. The framework is based on a novel term vector model of queries that integrates user selections and the content of selected documents extracted from the logs of a search engine. The query representation obtained allows us to treat query clustering similarly to standard document clustering. We study the application of the clustering framework to two problems: relevance ranking boosting and query recommendation. Finally, we evaluate with experiments the effectiveness of our approach.
  12. Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002) 0.00
    0.0026095328 = product of:
      0.036533456 = sum of:
        0.036533456 = product of:
          0.054800183 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
            0.027276294 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027276294 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2002 18:49:22
  13. Serrano Cobos, J.; Quintero Orta, A.: Design, development and management of an information recovery system for an Internet Website : from documentary theory to practice (2003) 0.00
    0.0025225044 = product of:
      0.03531506 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  14. Warnick, W.L.; Leberman, A.; Scott, R.L.; Spence, K.J.; Johnsom, L.A.; Allen, V.S.: Searching the deep Web : directed query engine applications at the Department of Energy (2001) 0.00
    0.0025225044 = product of:
      0.03531506 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=1215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Directed Query Engines, an emerging class of search engine specifically designed to access distributed resources on the deep web, offer the opportunity to create inexpensive digital libraries. Already, one such engine, Distributed Explorer, has been used to select and assemble high quality information resources and incorporate them into publicly available systems for the physical sciences. By nesting Directed Query Engines so that one query launches several other engines in a cascading fashion, enormous virtual collections may soon be assembled to form a comprehensive information infrastructure for the physical sciences. Once a Directed Query Engine has been configured for a set of information resources, distributed alerts tools can provide patrons with personalized, profile-based notices of recent additions to any of the selected resources. Due to the potentially enormous size and scope of Directed Query Engine applications, consideration must be given to issues surrounding the representation of large quantities of information from multiple, heterogeneous sources.
  15. Radhakrishnan, A.: Swoogle : an engine for the Semantic Web (2007) 0.00
    0.0016816697 = product of:
      0.023543375 = sum of:
        0.023543375 = weight(_text_:representation in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023543375 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.20333713 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    "Swoogle, the Semantic web search engine, is a research project carried out by the ebiquity research group in the Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland. It's an engine tailored towards finding documents on the semantic web. The whole research paper is available here. Semantic web is touted as the next generation of online content representation where the web documents are represented in a language that is not only easy for humans but is machine readable (easing the integration of data as never thought possible) as well. And the main elements of the semantic web include data model description formats such as Resource Description Framework (RDF), a variety of data interchange formats (e.g. RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples), and notations such as RDF Schema (RDFS), the Web Ontology Language (OWL), all of which are intended to provide a formal description of concepts, terms, and relationships within a given knowledge domain (Wikipedia). And Swoogle is an attempt to mine and index this new set of web documents. The engine performs crawling of semantic documents like most web search engines and the search is available as web service too. The engine is primarily written in Java with the PHP used for the front-end and MySQL for database. Swoogle is capable of searching over 10,000 ontologies and indexes more that 1.3 million web documents. It also computes the importance of a Semantic Web document. The techniques used for indexing are the more google-type page ranking and also mining the documents for inter-relationships that are the basis for the semantic web. For more information on how the RDF framework can be used to relate documents, read the link here. Being a research project, and with a non-commercial motive, there is not much hype around Swoogle. However, the approach to indexing of Semantic web documents is an approach that most engines will have to take at some point of time. When the Internet debuted, there were no specific engines available for indexing or searching. The Search domain only picked up as more and more content became available. One fundamental question that I've always wondered about it is - provided that the search engines return very relevant results for a query - how to ascertain that the documents are indeed the most relevant ones available. There is always an inherent delay in indexing of document. Its here that the new semantic documents search engines can close delay. Experimenting with the concept of Search in the semantic web can only bore well for the future of search technology."
  16. Perez, E.: dtSearch: the little search engine that could (2004) 0.00
    0.0013106616 = product of:
      0.01834926 = sum of:
        0.01834926 = product of:
          0.055047777 = sum of:
            0.055047777 = weight(_text_:29 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055047777 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Online. 29(2005) no.1, S.28-
  17. Kiefer, A.: ¬Die Googlewhacker (2002) 0.00
    0.0013047664 = product of:
      0.018266728 = sum of:
        0.018266728 = product of:
          0.027400091 = sum of:
            0.013761944 = weight(_text_:29 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013761944 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
            0.013638147 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013638147 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2002 10:28:22
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.66 vom 19.3.2002, S.29
  18. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.00
    0.0012988712 = product of:
      0.018184196 = sum of:
        0.018184196 = product of:
          0.05455259 = sum of:
            0.05455259 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05455259 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  19. Langville, A.N.; Meyer, C.D.: Google's PageRank and beyond : the science of search engine rankings (2006) 0.00
    0.0012612522 = product of:
      0.01765753 = sum of:
        0.01765753 = weight(_text_:representation in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01765753 = score(doc=6,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.15250285 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Introduction to Web Search Engines: 1.1 A Short History of Information Retrieval - 1.2 An Overview of Traditional Information Retrieval - 1.3 Web Information Retrieval Chapter 2. Crawling, Indexing, and Query Processing: 2.1 Crawling - 2.2 The Content Index - 2.3 Query Processing Chapter 3. Ranking Webpages by Popularity: 3.1 The Scene in 1998 - 3.2 Two Theses - 3.3 Query-Independence Chapter 4. The Mathematics of Google's PageRank: 4.1 The Original Summation Formula for PageRank - 4.2 Matrix Representation of the Summation Equations - 4.3 Problems with the Iterative Process - 4.4 A Little Markov Chain Theory - 4.5 Early Adjustments to the Basic Model - 4.6 Computation of the PageRank Vector - 4.7 Theorem and Proof for Spectrum of the Google Matrix Chapter 5. Parameters in the PageRank Model: 5.1 The a Factor - 5.2 The Hyperlink Matrix H - 5.3 The Teleportation Matrix E Chapter 6. The Sensitivity of PageRank; 6.1 Sensitivity with respect to alpha - 6.2 Sensitivity with respect to H - 6.3 Sensitivity with respect to vT - 6.4 Other Analyses of Sensitivity - 6.5 Sensitivity Theorems and Proofs Chapter 7. The PageRank Problem as a Linear System: 7.1 Properties of (I - alphaS) - 7.2 Properties of (I - alphaH) - 7.3 Proof of the PageRank Sparse Linear System Chapter 8. Issues in Large-Scale Implementation of PageRank: 8.1 Storage Issues - 8.2 Convergence Criterion - 8.3 Accuracy - 8.4 Dangling Nodes - 8.5 Back Button Modeling
  20. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.00
    0.0011480509 = product of:
      0.016072711 = sum of:
        0.016072711 = product of:
          0.04821813 = sum of:
            0.04821813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04821813 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22

Languages

  • d 94
  • e 67

Types

  • a 149
  • m 7
  • el 6
  • x 2
  • More… Less…