Search (62 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.02
    0.024131328 = product of:
      0.09652531 = sum of:
        0.033692583 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033692583 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
        0.06283273 = sum of:
          0.036526304 = weight(_text_:system in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036526304 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02630642 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of user viewing and query-matching behavior furnishes additional evidence that the relevance of retrieved images for system users may arise from descriptions of objects and content-based elements that are not evident or not even present in the image. This investigation looks at how users assign pre-determined query terms to retrieved images, as well as looking at a post-retrieval process of image engagement to user cognitive assessments of meaningful terms. Additionally, affective/emotion-based query terms appear to be an important descriptive category for image retrieval. A system for capturing (eliciting) human interpretations derived from cognitive engagements with viewed images could further enhance the efficiency of image retrieval systems stemming from traditional indexing methods and technology-based content extraction algorithms. An approach to such a system is posited.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  2. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.023699556 = product of:
      0.06319881 = sum of:
        0.025936563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025936563 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.019882401 = product of:
          0.039764803 = sum of:
            0.039764803 = weight(_text_:system in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039764803 = score(doc=5830,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.017379852 = product of:
          0.034759704 = sum of:
            0.034759704 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034759704 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  3. Caldera-Serrano, J.: Thematic description of audio-visual information on television (2010) 0.02
    0.02027187 = product of:
      0.08108748 = sum of:
        0.033692583 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033692583 = score(doc=3953,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
        0.047394894 = sum of:
          0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021088472 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
          0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02630642 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper endeavours to show the possibilities for thematic description of audio-visual documents for television with the aim of promoting and facilitating information retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - To achieve these goals different database fields are shown, as well as the way in which they are organised for indexing and thematic element description, analysed and used as an example. Some of the database fields are extracted from an analytical study of the documentary system of television in Spain. Others are being tested in university television on which indexing experiments are carried out. Findings - Not all thematic descriptions are used on television information systems; nevertheless, some television channels do use thematic descriptions of both image and sound, applying thesauri. Moreover, it is possible to access sequences using full text retrieval as well. Originality/value - The development of the documentary task, applying the described techniques, promotes thematic indexing and hence thematic retrieval. Given the fact that this is without doubt one of the aspects most demanded by television journalists (along with people's names). This conceptualisation translates into the adaptation of databases to new indexing methods.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:40:35
  4. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.02
    0.01530289 = product of:
      0.06121156 = sum of:
        0.045849796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045849796 = score(doc=4888,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
        0.015361764 = product of:
          0.030723527 = sum of:
            0.030723527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030723527 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  5. Austin, J.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on user's value criteria. Pt.1 (1983) 0.01
    0.014998328 = product of:
      0.05999331 = sum of:
        0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038904842 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
        0.021088472 = product of:
          0.042176943 = sum of:
            0.042176943 = weight(_text_:system in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042176943 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  6. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.011099116 = product of:
      0.044396464 = sum of:
        0.032094855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032094855 = score(doc=5828,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.012301609 = product of:
          0.024603218 = sum of:
            0.024603218 = weight(_text_:system in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024603218 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.01
    0.009509975 = product of:
      0.0380399 = sum of:
        0.02269449 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02269449 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
        0.015345411 = product of:
          0.030690823 = sum of:
            0.030690823 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030690823 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Theories of aboutness and theories of subject analysis and of related concepts such as topicality are often isolated from each other in the literature of information science (IS) and related disciplines. In IS it is important to consider the nature and meaning of these concepts, which is closely related to theoretical and metatheoretical issues in information retrieval (IR). A theory of IR must specify which concepts should be regarded as synonymous concepts and explain how the meaning of the nonsynonymous concepts should be defined
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  8. Taylor, S.L.: Integrating natural language understanding with document structure analysis (1994) 0.01
    0.008749025 = product of:
      0.0349961 = sum of:
        0.02269449 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02269449 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
        0.012301609 = product of:
          0.024603218 = sum of:
            0.024603218 = weight(_text_:system in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024603218 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Document understanding, the interpretation of a document from its image form, is a technology area which benefits greatly from the integration of natural language processing with image processing. Develops a prototype of an Intelligent Document Understanding System (IDUS) which employs several technologies: image processing, optical character recognition, document structure analysis and text understanding in a cooperative fashion. Discusses those areas of research during development of IDUS where it is found that the most benefit from the integration of natural language processing and image processing occured: document structure analysis, OCR correction, and text analysis. Discusses 2 applications which are supported by IDUS: text retrieval and automatic generation of hypertext links
  9. Inskip, C.; MacFarlane, A.; Rafferty, P.: Meaning, communication, music : towards a revised communication model (2008) 0.01
    0.00792794 = product of:
      0.03171176 = sum of:
        0.022924898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022924898 = score(doc=2347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.008786863 = product of:
          0.017573725 = sum of:
            0.017573725 = weight(_text_:system in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017573725 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - If an information retrieval system is going to be of value to the user then it must give meaning to the information which matches the meaning given to it by the user. The meaning given to music varies according to who is interpreting it - the author/composer, the performer, cataloguer or the listener - and this affects how music is organized and retrieved. This paper aims to examine the meaning of music, how meaning is communicated and suggests this may affect music retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - Musicology is used to define music and examine its functions leading to a discussion of how music has been organised and described. Various ways of establishing the meaning of music are reviewed, focussing on established musical analysis techniques. It is suggested that traditional methods are of limited use with digitised popular music. A discussion of semiotics and a review of semiotic analysis in western art music leads to a discussion of semiotics of popular music and examines ideas of Middleton, Stefani and Tagg. Findings - Agreeing that music exists when communication takes place, a discussion of selected communication models leads to the proposal of a revised version of Tagg's model, adjusting it to include listener feedback. Originality/value - The outcome of the analysis is a revised version of Tagg's communication model, adapted to reflect user feedback. It is suggested that this revised communication model reflects the way in which meaning is given to music.
  10. Zarri, G.P.: Indexing and querying of narrative documents, a knowledge representation approach (2003) 0.01
    0.0064316923 = product of:
      0.05145354 = sum of:
        0.05145354 = product of:
          0.10290708 = sum of:
            0.10290708 = weight(_text_:etc in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10290708 = score(doc=2691,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.59242874 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    We describe here NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation Language), a semantic formalism for taking into account the characteristics of narrative multimedia documents. In these documents, the information content consists in the description of 'events' that relate the real or intended behaviour of some 'actors' (characters, personages, etc.). Narrative documents of an economic interest correspond to news stories, corporate documents, normative and legal texts, intelligence messages, representation of patient's medical records, etc. NKRL is characterised by the use of several knowledge representation principles and several high-level inference tools.
  11. Enser, P.G.B.; Sandom, C.J.; Hare, J.S.; Lewis, P.H.: Facing the reality of semantic image retrieval (2007) 0.01
    0.0064077033 = product of:
      0.051261626 = sum of:
        0.051261626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051261626 = score(doc=837,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.5284309 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide a better-informed view of the extent of the semantic gap in image retrieval, and the limited potential for bridging it offered by current semantic image retrieval techniques. Design/methodology/approach - Within an ongoing project, a broad spectrum of operational image retrieval activity has been surveyed, and, from a number of collaborating institutions, a test collection assembled which comprises user requests, the images selected in response to those requests, and their associated metadata. This has provided the evidence base upon which to make informed observations on the efficacy of cutting-edge automatic annotation techniques which seek to integrate the text-based and content-based image retrieval paradigms. Findings - Evidence from the real-world practice of image retrieval highlights the existence of a generic-specific continuum of object identification, and the incidence of temporal, spatial, significance and abstract concept facets, manifest in textual indexing and real-query scenarios but often having no directly visible presence in an image. These factors combine to limit the functionality of current semantic image retrieval techniques, which interpret only visible features at the generic extremity of the generic-specific continuum. Research limitations/implications - The project is concerned with the traditional image retrieval environment in which retrieval transactions are conducted on still images which form part of managed collections. The possibilities offered by ontological support for adding functionality to automatic annotation techniques are considered. Originality/value - The paper offers fresh insights into the challenge of migrating content-based image retrieval from the laboratory to the operational environment, informed by newly-assembled, comprehensive, live data.
  12. From information to knowledge : conceptual and content analysis by computer (1995) 0.01
    0.0062493035 = product of:
      0.024997214 = sum of:
        0.016210351 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016210351 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
        0.008786863 = product of:
          0.017573725 = sum of:
            0.017573725 = weight(_text_:system in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017573725 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    SCHMIDT, K.M.: Concepts - content - meaning: an introduction; DUCHASTEL, J. et al.: The SACAO project: using computation toward textual data analysis; PAQUIN, L.-C. u. L. DUPUY: An approach to expertise transfer: computer-assisted text analysis; HOGENRAAD, R., Y. BESTGEN u. J.-L. NYSTEN: Terrorist rhetoric: texture and architecture; MOHLER, P.P.: On the interaction between reading and computing: an interpretative approach to content analysis; LANCASHIRE, I.: Computer tools for cognitive stylistics; MERGENTHALER, E.: An outline of knowledge based text analysis; NAMENWIRTH, J.Z.: Ideography in computer-aided content analysis; WEBER, R.P. u. J.Z. Namenwirth: Content-analytic indicators: a self-critique; McKINNON, A.: Optimizing the aberrant frequency word technique; ROSATI, R.: Factor analysis in classical archaeology: export patterns of Attic pottery trade; PETRILLO, P.S.: Old and new worlds: ancient coinage and modern technology; DARANYI, S., S. MARJAI u.a.: Caryatids and the measurement of semiosis in architecture; ZARRI, G.P.: Intelligent information retrieval: an application in the field of historical biographical data; BOUCHARD, G., R. ROY u.a.: Computers and genealogy: from family reconstitution to population reconstruction; DEMÉLAS-BOHY, M.-D. u. M. RENAUD: Instability, networks and political parties: a political history expert system prototype; DARANYI, S., A. ABRANYI u. G. KOVACS: Knowledge extraction from ethnopoetic texts by multivariate statistical methods; FRAUTSCHI, R.L.: Measures of narrative voice in French prose fiction applied to textual samples from the enlightenment to the twentieth century; DANNENBERG, R. u.a.: A project in computer music: the musician's workbench
  13. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.01
    0.0056736227 = product of:
      0.04538898 = sum of:
        0.04538898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04538898 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  14. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.00
    0.004936968 = product of:
      0.039495744 = sum of:
        0.039495744 = sum of:
          0.017573725 = weight(_text_:system in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017573725 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.021922018 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021922018 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper a framework for the construction and organization of knowledge organization and representation languages in the context of digital photograph collections is presented. It analyses exigencies of photographs as documentary objects, as well as several models of indexing, different proposals of languages and a theoretical revision of ontologies in this research field, in relation to visual documents. In considering the photograph as an analysis object, it is appropriate to study all its attributes: features, components or properties of an objeet that can be represented in an information processing system. The attributes which are related to visual features include cognitive and affective answers and elements that describe spatial, semantic, symbolic or emotional features about a photograph. In any case, it is necessary to treat: a) morphological and material attributes (emulsion, state of preservation); b) biographical attributes: (school or trend, publication or exhibition); c) attributes of content: what and how a photograph says something; d) relational attributes: visual documents establish relationships with other documents that can be analysed in order to understand them.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:20:55
  15. Ornager, S.: View a picture : theoretical image analysis and empirical user studies on indexing and retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0049135014 = product of:
      0.03930801 = sum of:
        0.03930801 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03930801 = score(doc=904,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines Panofsky's and Barthes's theories of image analysis and reports on a study of criteria for analysis and indexing of images and the different types of user queries used in 15 Danish newspaper image archives. A structured interview method and observation and various categories for subject analysis were used. The results identify a list of the minimum number of elements and led to user typology of 5 categories. The requirement for retrieval may involve combining images in a more visual way with text-based image retrieval
  16. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Democratic indexing : an approach to the retrieval of fiction (1997) 0.00
    0.0049135014 = product of:
      0.03930801 = sum of:
        0.03930801 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03930801 = score(doc=1783,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how an analytical framework to describe the contents of images may be extended to deal with time based materials like film and music. A levels of meanings table was developed and used as an indexing template for image retrieval purposes. Develops a concept of democratic indexing which focused on user interpretation. Describes the approach to image or pictorial information retrieval. Extends the approach in relation to fiction
  17. Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997) 0.00
    0.0049135014 = product of:
      0.03930801 = sum of:
        0.03930801 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03930801 = score(doc=5844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The arts, humanities, and social sciences commonly borrow concepts and methods from the sciences, but interdisciplinary borrowing seldom occurs in the opposite direction. Research on narrative discourse is relevant to problems of documentary storage and retrieval, for the arts and humanities in particular, but also for other broad areas of knowledge. This paper views the potential application of narrative discourse analysis to information storage and retrieval problems from 2 perspectives: 1) analysis and comparison of narrative documents in all disciplines may be simplified if fundamental categories that occur in narrative documents can be isolated; and 2) the possibility of subdividing the world of knowledge initially into narrative and non-narrative documents is explored with particular attention to Werlich's work on text types
  18. Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980) 0.00
    0.0048631052 = product of:
      0.038904842 = sum of:
        0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038904842 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  19. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985) 0.00
    0.0048631052 = product of:
      0.038904842 = sum of:
        0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038904842 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  20. Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990) 0.00
    0.0048631052 = product of:
      0.038904842 = sum of:
        0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038904842 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper argues that the realisation of the electronic hypermedia of the future depends on integrating the technology of free text retrieval with the classification-based discipline of content analysis

Languages

  • e 55
  • d 7

Types

  • a 53
  • m 5
  • x 3
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…