Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.02
    0.020455882 = product of:
      0.08182353 = sum of:
        0.019452421 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019452421 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
        0.062371105 = product of:
          0.12474221 = sum of:
            0.12474221 = weight(_text_:etc in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12474221 = score(doc=4913,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.7181321 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
    LCSH
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
  2. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.01
    0.009237243 = product of:
      0.03694897 = sum of:
        0.010961009 = product of:
          0.021922018 = sum of:
            0.021922018 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021922018 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02598796 = product of:
          0.05197592 = sum of:
            0.05197592 = weight(_text_:etc in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05197592 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to systemize and improve the scientific status of studies on document abstracting. This is a diachronic, systematic study of document abstracting studies carried out from different perspectives and models (textual, psycholinguistic, social and communicative). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the perspectives and analysis proposals which are of interest to the various theoreticians of abstracting is carried out using a variety of techniques and approaches (cognitive, linguistic, communicative-social, didactic, etc.), each with different levels of theoretical and methodological abstraction and degrees of application. The most significant contributions of each are reviewed and highlighted, along with their limitations. Findings - It is found that the great challenge in abstracting is the systemization of models and conceptual apparatus, which open up this type of research to semiotic and socio-interactional perspectives. It is necessary to carry out suitable empirical research with operative designs and ad hoc measuring instruments which can measure the efficiency of the abstracting and the efficiency of a good abstract, while at the same time feeding back into the theoretical baggage of this type of study. Such research will have to explain and provide answers to all the elements and variables, which affect the realization and the reception of a quality abstract. Originality/value - The paper provides a small map of the studies on document abstracting. This shows how the conceptual and methodological framework has extended at the same time as the Science of Documentation has been evolving. All the models analysed - the communicative and interactional approach - are integrated in a new systematic framework.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:19
  3. Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007) 0.01
    0.008535085 = product of:
      0.06828068 = sum of:
        0.06828068 = product of:
          0.13656136 = sum of:
            0.13656136 = weight(_text_:manuals in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13656136 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23796216 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.57387847 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Public library catalogues in early twentieth-century Britain frequently included annotations, either to clarify obscure titles or to provide further information about the subject-matter of the books they described. Two manuals giving instruction on how to do this were published at that time. Following World War I, with the decline of the printed catalogue, this kind of annotation became rarer, and was almost confined to bulletins of new books. The early issues of the British National Bibliography included some annotations in exceptional cases. Parallels are drawn with the provision of table-of-contents information in present-day OPAC's.
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.01
    0.007796388 = product of:
      0.062371105 = sum of:
        0.062371105 = product of:
          0.12474221 = sum of:
            0.12474221 = weight(_text_:etc in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12474221 = score(doc=4141,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.7181321 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    LCSH
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
  5. Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000) 0.01
    0.007499164 = product of:
      0.029996656 = sum of:
        0.019452421 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019452421 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.010544236 = product of:
          0.021088472 = sum of:
            0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021088472 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing and abstracting are not activities that should be looked upon as ends in themselves. It is the results of these activities that should be evaluated and this can only be done within the context of a particular database, whether in printed or machine-readable form. In this context, the indexing can be judged successful if it allows searchers to locate items they want without having to look at many they do not want. This book intended primarily as a text to be used in teaching indexing and abstracting of Library and information science. It is an immense value to all individuals and institutions involved in information retrieval and related activities, including librarians, managers of information centres and database producers.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Indexing and Abstracting 2. Automatic Indexing and Automatic Abstracting 3. Principles of Indexing 4.Periodicals Listing and Accessioning 5. Online Computer Service 6. Dialog, Searching and Bibliographic Display 7. Books 8. Bibliographic Control 9. Abstracting Functions 10. Acquisition System 11. Future of Indexing and Abstracting Services
  6. Wang, F.L.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The impact analysis of language differences on an automatic multilingual text summarization system (2006) 0.01
    0.0062493035 = product of:
      0.024997214 = sum of:
        0.016210351 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016210351 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.008786863 = product of:
          0.017573725 = sum of:
            0.017573725 = weight(_text_:system in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017573725 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the salient features of the documents, automatic text summarization systems extract the key sentences from source documents. This process supports the users in evaluating the relevance of the extracted documents returned by information retrieval systems. Because of this tool, efficient filtering can be achieved. Indirectly, these systems help to resolve the problem of information overloading. Many automatic text summarization systems have been implemented for use with different languages. It has been established that the grammatical and lexical differences between languages have a significant effect on text processing. However, the impact of the language differences on the automatic text summarization systems has not yet been investigated. The authors provide an impact analysis of language difference on automatic text summarization. It includes the effect on the extraction processes, the scoring mechanisms, the performance, and the matching of the extracted sentences, using the parallel corpus in English and Chinese as the tested object. The analysis results provide a greater understanding of language differences and promote the future development of more advanced text summarization techniques.
  7. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01
    0.005894781 = product of:
      0.023579124 = sum of:
        0.010544236 = product of:
          0.021088472 = sum of:
            0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021088472 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013034889 = product of:
          0.026069777 = sum of:
            0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026069777 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  8. Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999) 0.01
    0.0056736227 = product of:
      0.04538898 = sum of:
        0.04538898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04538898 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  9. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.01
    0.0056154304 = product of:
      0.044923443 = sum of:
        0.044923443 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044923443 = score(doc=684,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
  10. Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996) 0.00
    0.004052588 = product of:
      0.032420702 = sum of:
        0.032420702 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032420702 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews, enlarges upon and refines the author's three-stage analytical reading method (retrieval reading, creative reading and critical reading) for the preparation of informative and indicative literature abstracts
  11. O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997) 0.00
    0.004011857 = product of:
      0.032094855 = sum of:
        0.032094855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032094855 = score(doc=85,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original research and review articles and, in the past 10 years, several major medical periodicals have adopted the policy of including such abstracts with all their articles. A review of the literature reveals that proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some periodicals have not adopted structured abstracts and their opponents claim that they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Concludes that previous research on structured abstracts focused on how closely they followed prescribed structure and include salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article
  12. Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983) 0.00
    0.0038363528 = product of:
      0.030690823 = sum of:
        0.030690823 = product of:
          0.061381646 = sum of:
            0.061381646 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061381646 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  13. Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983) 0.00
    0.0038363528 = product of:
      0.030690823 = sum of:
        0.030690823 = product of:
          0.061381646 = sum of:
            0.061381646 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061381646 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  14. Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983) 0.00
    0.0038363528 = product of:
      0.030690823 = sum of:
        0.030690823 = product of:
          0.061381646 = sum of:
            0.061381646 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061381646 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  15. Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983) 0.00
    0.0038363528 = product of:
      0.030690823 = sum of:
        0.030690823 = product of:
          0.061381646 = sum of:
            0.061381646 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061381646 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  16. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0032420703 = product of:
      0.025936563 = sum of:
        0.025936563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025936563 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  17. Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990) 0.00
    0.0032420703 = product of:
      0.025936563 = sum of:
        0.025936563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025936563 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die Qualität der Dokumentenanlyse entscheidet über die Wirksamkeit eines Dokumentationsvorhabens, denn Auswahl und Darstellung von Informationselementen bilden die Grundlage zum Wiederfinden des dokumentierten Wissens. Kurzreferate informieren über den Inhalt einer Veröffentlichung. Verschiedene Typen von Inhaltsangaben werden entsprechend der DIN 1426 vorgestellt, Vorschriften und Anweisungen an Referate werden analysiert und die Bewertung der Qualität von Kurzreferaten diskutiert. Das zunehmende Wissen über den Aufbau und das Information Retrieval von Faktendatenbanken führt zu der Schlußfolgerung, daß über die verbale Kurzdarstellung des Dokumenteninhalts hinaus Fakten extrahiert und in speziellen Datenbanken gespeichert werden sollten
  18. Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997) 0.00
    0.0032420703 = product of:
      0.025936563 = sum of:
        0.025936563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025936563 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  19. Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996) 0.00
    0.0032420703 = product of:
      0.025936563 = sum of:
        0.025936563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025936563 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews, enlarges upon and refines the author's three-stage analytical reading method (retrieval reading, creative reading and critical reading) for the preparation of informative and indicative literature abstracts
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.00
    0.0028368114 = product of:
      0.02269449 = sum of:
        0.02269449 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02269449 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures