Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.03
    0.032706924 = product of:
      0.081767306 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.061165623 = product of:
          0.12233125 = sum of:
            0.12233125 = weight(_text_:exercises in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12233125 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.47145814 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
  2. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification : problems and prospects in online retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.010987563 = product of:
      0.054937813 = sum of:
        0.054937813 = product of:
          0.10987563 = sum of:
            0.10987563 = weight(_text_:problems in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10987563 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.72964144 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  3. Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006) 0.01
    0.008278403 = product of:
      0.041392017 = sum of:
        0.041392017 = product of:
          0.082784034 = sum of:
            0.082784034 = weight(_text_:etc in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082784034 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
  4. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.01
    0.007909016 = product of:
      0.039545078 = sum of:
        0.039545078 = product of:
          0.079090156 = sum of:
            0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079090156 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  5. Micco, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules (1992) 0.01
    0.0077693807 = product of:
      0.038846903 = sum of:
        0.038846903 = product of:
          0.077693805 = sum of:
            0.077693805 = weight(_text_:problems in 2108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077693805 = score(doc=2108,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.5159344 = fieldWeight in 2108, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    It will not be an easy task to automate the Library of Congress Classification schedules because it is a very large system and also because it developed long before automation. The designers were creating a system for shelving books effiently and had not even imagined the constraints imposed by automation. A number of problems and possible solutions are discussed. The MARC format proposed for classification has some serious problems which are identified
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.: Classification to the rescue : handling the problems of too many and too few retrievals (1996) 0.01
    0.0071366318 = product of:
      0.03568316 = sum of:
        0.03568316 = product of:
          0.07136632 = sum of:
            0.07136632 = weight(_text_:problems in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07136632 = score(doc=5164,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.47391602 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The first studies of online catalog use demonstrated that the problems of too many and too few retrievals plagued the earliest online catalog users. Despite 15 years of system development, implementation, and evaluation, these problems still adversely affect the subject searches of today's online catalog users. In fact, the large-retrievals problem has grown more acute due to the growth of online catalog databases. This paper explores the use of library classifications for consolidating and summarizing high-posted subject searches and for handling subject searches that result in no or too few retrievals. Findings are presented in the form of generalization about retrievals and library classifications, needed improvements to classification terminology, and suggestions for improved functionality to facilitate the display of retrieved titles in online catalogs
  7. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01
    0.005931762 = product of:
      0.02965881 = sum of:
        0.02965881 = product of:
          0.05931762 = sum of:
            0.05931762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05931762 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  8. Cochrane, P.A.; Johnson, E.H.: Visual Dewey : DDC in a hypertextual browser for the library user (1996) 0.01
    0.0059131454 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = product of:
          0.05913145 = sum of:
            0.05913145 = weight(_text_:etc in 5163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05913145 = score(doc=5163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 5163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A new design for the DDC allows for display of the schedules and indexes in a hypertextual browser which was originally designed for the more conventional thesaurus with BT-NT, RT and USE-UF relations. Features of the DDC which approxumate those relations and the presentation of the rich vocabulary found in the hierarchical structure, captions, index entries and notes are represented for the library user's perusal and choice before searching a library's holdings. By dragging and dropping parts from such a display into a search window, the search for bibliographic items can begin and revised painlessly. Information such as class numbers of subject headings for retrieved items can be dragged and dropped into the searchw indow of the Visual Dewey display window as it suits the user to review vocabulary or revise the search results. This seamless to-ing and fro-ing allows for a truly interactive and spontaneous search environment, with maximum assistance at point of need. 'File folders' exist for saving any Visual Dewey information, any retrieved items, etc.
  9. Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.0059131454 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = product of:
          0.05913145 = sum of:
            0.05913145 = weight(_text_:etc in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05913145 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Spärck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of the Journal of Documentation celebration, "60 years of the best in information research". Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Sparck Jones as its starting-point. Analysis involves distinctions between "positivism" and "pragmatism" and "classical" versus Kuhnian understandings of concepts. Findings - Classification, both manual and automatic, for retrieval benefits from drawing upon a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, a consideration of theories of meaning, and the adding of top-down approaches to IR in which divisions of labour, domains, traditions, genres, document architectures etc. are included as analytical elements and in which specific IR algorithms are based on the examination of specific literatures. Introduces an example illustrating the consequences of a full implementation of a pragmatist understanding when handling homonyms. Practical implications - Outlines how to classify from a pragmatic-philosophical point of view. Originality/value - Provides, emphasizing a pragmatic understanding, insights of importance to classification for retrieval, both manual and automatic. - Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.319-332.
  10. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.01
    0.0058270353 = product of:
      0.029135175 = sum of:
        0.029135175 = product of:
          0.05827035 = sum of:
            0.05827035 = weight(_text_:problems in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05827035 = score(doc=2114,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.3869508 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The last several years have seen the evolution of prototype systems exploiting the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as an interface to online catalogs. One such system, calles DORS (Dewy Online Retrieval System) was developed at the University of California, Los Angeles by the authors. The feature distinguishing this system is an automatically generated chain index, in particular the algorithms that were created for its automatic generation and the problems that were encountered. The problems were of three kinds: those that were overcome, but were not for lack of time and resources and those that we believe cannot be overcome. The paper concludes with suggestions for future resaerch and possible formatting changes to the DDC feature headings that would facilitate chain-index generation
  11. Koh, G.S.: Options in classification available through modern technology (1995) 0.01
    0.0054937815 = product of:
      0.027468907 = sum of:
        0.027468907 = product of:
          0.054937813 = sum of:
            0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054937813 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    System design options and user searching options are discussed. The problems of electronic union catalogs, including a 'virtual union catalog' in particular are considered and enhancements made possible through classification are explored. The combined system of subject headings and classification is presented as the model of the integrated subject searching tool which will meet individualized learning styles and user responsive vocabulary
  12. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.00
    0.004943135 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  13. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.00
    0.004943135 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  14. Santoro, M.; Spinelli, S.: Non solo numeri (1995) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The interfaculty centre of Bologna University began 2 years ago a project to 'translate' UDC codes into a user friendly thesaurus, with the object of creating an accurate, easy to use tool for online researches, especially those relating to periodical titles. The UDC numerical codes have been linked by a method based on synonyms to a series of corresponding verbal indices which express in natural language the concepts expressed by the codes. Thus researchers can retrieve information not only through UDC codes but also through their analogous verbal descriptors. Describes the progress of the UDC project so far, and some problems encountered
  15. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
  16. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.00
    0.0041943896 = product of:
      0.020971946 = sum of:
        0.020971946 = product of:
          0.041943893 = sum of:
            0.041943893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041943893 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  17. Pollitt, A.S.: ¬The key role of classification and indexing in view-based searching (1998) 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The application of classification schemes and thesauri to improve online information retrieval can be traced back to the beginnings of online searching itself, but the true potential for using knowledge structures in the user interface has yet to be realized. View-based searching seeks to exploit the classified arrangements in thesauri and existing classification schemes to improve the performance of such systems. HIBROWSE for EMBASE is a system which demonstrates the power of applying an approach to information retrieval which is strongly related to faceted classification. It does this by employing a point a click user interface with mutually constraining views utilising knowledge structure hierarchies for both query specification and the presentation of results. The relevance of this approach to library OPACs is discussed in the context of the digital library, concluding that out legacy of research in classification and indexing is more relevant than ever in the design of systems to cope with the problems of information access
  18. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
  19. Saye, J.D.: ¬"The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment" : a reaction (1990) 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This response to the paper by Dr. Chan, while accepting the merits of call number searching in the theoretical sense, raises questions about its usefulness in typical library situations. Compares searching on-line with call numbers and the use of classified catalogues and shelflists. Asks who is expected to do call number searching. Considers the availability of indexes to the classification scheme, problems created by the provision of only 1 class number per document, and the use of multiple cutter numbers to express the subject of a document.
  20. Speller, B.F.: Access to information in an online environment : editor's introduction (1990) 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    There is every indication that classification systems which are international in their use, and free from the impact of national languages, will be given strong consideration as the choice for an information retrieval language in an automated environment. The aims of the Symposium were: to provide a forum for discussion of the problems and opportunities emerging from MARC records; to reconsider intellectual level as a significant determinant of information retrieval; and to explore the potential of the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification systems as information retrieval languages in an on-line environment.

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 8
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 43
  • el 5
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications