Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Hirsh, S.G.: Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources (1999) 0.02
    0.023989068 = product of:
      0.047978137 = sum of:
        0.047978137 = product of:
          0.09595627 = sum of:
            0.09595627 = weight(_text_:literacy in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09595627 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.32399878 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores the relevance criteria and search strategies elementary school children applied when searching for information related to a class assignment in a school library setting. Students were interviewed on 2 occasions at different stages of the research process; field observations involved students thinking aloud to explain their search proceses and shadowing as students moved around the school library. Students performed searches on an online catalog, an electronic encyclopedia, an electronic magazine index, and the WWW. Results are presented for children selecting the topic, conducting the search, examining the results, and extracting relevant results. A total of 254 mentions of relevance criteria were identified, including 197 references to textual relevance criteria that were coded into 9 categories and 57 references to graphical relevance criteria that were coded into 5 categories. Students exhibited little concern for the authority of the textual and graphical information they found, based the majority of their relevance decisions for textual material on topicality, and identified information they found interesting. Students devoted a large portion of their research time to find pictures. Understanding the ways that children use electronic resources and the relevance criteria they apply has implications for information literacy training and for systems design
  2. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.023945544 = product of:
      0.047891088 = sum of:
        0.047891088 = product of:
          0.095782176 = sum of:
            0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095782176 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  3. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.023945544 = product of:
      0.047891088 = sum of:
        0.047891088 = product of:
          0.095782176 = sum of:
            0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095782176 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  4. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.023945544 = product of:
      0.047891088 = sum of:
        0.047891088 = product of:
          0.095782176 = sum of:
            0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095782176 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  5. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.023945544 = product of:
      0.047891088 = sum of:
        0.047891088 = product of:
          0.095782176 = sum of:
            0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095782176 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  6. Mansourian, Y.; Ford, N.: Search persistence and failure on the web : a "bounded rationality" and "satisficing" analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.019191254 = product of:
      0.038382508 = sum of:
        0.038382508 = product of:
          0.076765016 = sum of:
            0.076765016 = weight(_text_:literacy in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076765016 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.25919902 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to examine our current knowledge of how searchers perceive and react to the possibility of missing potentially important information whilst searching the web is limited. The study reported here seeks to investigate such perceptions and reactions, and to explore the extent to which Simon's "bounded rationality" theory is useful in illuminating these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Totally 37 academic staff, research staff and research students in three university departments were interviewed about their web searching. The open-ended, semi-structured interviews were inductively analysed. Emergence of the concept of "good enough" searching prompted a further analysis to explore the extent to which the data could be interpreted in terms of Simon's concepts of "bounded rationality" and "satisficing". Findings - The results indicate that the risk of missing potentially important information was a matter of concern to the interviewees. Their estimations of the likely extent and importance of missed information affected decisions by individuals as to when to stop searching - decisions based on very different criteria, which map well onto Simon's concepts. On the basis of the interview data, the authors propose tentative categorizations of perceptions of the risk of missing information including "inconsequential" "tolerable" "damaging" and "disastrous" and search strategies including "perfunctory" "minimalist" "nervous" and "extensive". It is concluded that there is at least a prima facie case for bounded rationality and satisficing being considered as potentially useful concepts in our quest better to understand aspects of human information behaviour. Research limitations/implications - Although the findings are based on a relatively small sample and an exploratory qualitative analysis, it is argued that the study raises a number of interesting questions, and has implications for both the development of theory and practice in the areas of web searching and information literacy. Originality/value - The paper focuses on an aspect of web searching which has not to date been well explored. Whilst research has done much to illuminate searchers' perceptions of what they find on the web, we know relatively little of their perceptions of, and reactions to information that they fail to find. The study reported here provides some tentative models, based on empirical evidence, of these phenomena.
  7. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  8. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  9. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  10. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  11. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  12. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  14. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  15. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  16. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  17. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  18. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  19. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  20. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22