Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dextre Clarke, S.G."
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.10
    0.100349575 = product of:
      0.20069915 = sum of:
        0.20069915 = sum of:
          0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10215352 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09854564 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag anläßlich des Seminars "Tools for knowledge organization - ISKO UK Seminar", 4. September 2007
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software (2000) 0.05
    0.052074112 = product of:
      0.104148224 = sum of:
        0.104148224 = sum of:
          0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061914384 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:45
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  3. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.05
    0.050174788 = product of:
      0.100349575 = sum of:
        0.100349575 = sum of:
          0.05107676 = weight(_text_:organization in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05107676 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  4. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.02
    0.021890039 = product of:
      0.043780077 = sum of:
        0.043780077 = product of:
          0.087560154 = sum of:
            0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087560154 = score(doc=5210,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.6, S.439-459
  5. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The last 50 years of knowledge organization : a journey through my personal archives (2009) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=4344,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    At the time when the Institute of Information Scientists was launched, well established principles of classification, especially faceted classification, provided an excellent springboard for developments in knowledge organization thereafter. The principles of thesaurus construction and use were worked out during the first two decades of the Institute's existence. Up until the end of the 1980s, most practical systems to exploit any of these vocabularies were held on cards, some of them highly ingenious. The subsequent arrival of the desktop computer, soon followed by the growth of networks providing access to an almost unimaginable quantity and variety of resources, has stimulated evolution of the knowledge organization schemes to exploit the technology available. Anecdotes of events and practical applications of controlled vocabularies illustrate this account of developments over the period.
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Knowledge organization system standards (2009) 0.02
    0.018058361 = product of:
      0.036116723 = sum of:
        0.036116723 = product of:
          0.072233446 = sum of:
            0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072233446 = score(doc=3833,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This entry presents an overview of the standards for different types of knowledge organization system (KOS). Their development history and the principles within them are described. Standards for thesauri receive most attention, since other types of KOS are less standardized. The arrival of the Internet, enabling simultaneous access to multiple disparate systems and resources, caused a major reorientation of standardization efforts in the last decade, towards interoperability goals. Current initiatives address two main needs: interoperability between KOSs, and data exchange between one vocabulary application and another. The prospects for bringing the standards together are discussed.
  7. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Planning controlled vocabularies for the UK public sector (2003) 0.02
    0.015478596 = product of:
      0.030957192 = sum of:
        0.030957192 = product of:
          0.061914384 = sum of:
            0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061914384 = score(doc=2695,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  8. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Overview of ISO NP 25964 : structured vocabularies for information retrieval (2007) 0.02
    0.015478596 = product of:
      0.030957192 = sum of:
        0.030957192 = product of:
          0.061914384 = sum of:
            0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061914384 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  9. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: ¬The thesaurus debate continues : guest editorial (2016) 0.01
    0.014593359 = product of:
      0.029186718 = sum of:
        0.029186718 = product of:
          0.058373436 = sum of:
            0.058373436 = weight(_text_:organization in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058373436 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.3, S.135-137
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: Questions and answers on current developments inspired by the thesaurus tradition : points of view (2016) 0.01
    0.014593359 = product of:
      0.029186718 = sum of:
        0.029186718 = product of:
          0.058373436 = sum of:
            0.058373436 = weight(_text_:organization in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058373436 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.3, S.203 - 208
  11. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Origins and trajectory of the long thesaurus debate (2016) 0.01
    0.01289883 = product of:
      0.02579766 = sum of:
        0.02579766 = product of:
          0.05159532 = sum of:
            0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05159532 = score(doc=2913,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval thesaurus emerged in the 1950s, settled down to a more-or-less standard format in the 1970s and has continued to evolve marginally since then. Throughout its whole lifetime, doubts have been expressed about its efficacy with emphasis latterly on cost-effectiveness. Prolonged testing of different styles of index language in the 1970s failed to settle the doubts. The arena occupied by the debate has moved from small isolated databases in the post-war era to diverse situations nowadays with the whole Internet at one extreme and small in-house collections at the other. Sophisticated statistical techniques now dominate the retrieval landscape on the Internet but leave opportunities for the thesaurus and other knowledge organization techniques in niches such as image libraries and corporate intranets. The promise of an ontology-driven semantic web with linked data resources opens another opportunity. Thus much scope remains for research to establish the usefulness of the thesaurus in these places and to inspire its continuing evolution.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.3, S.138-144
  12. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.012318205 = product of:
      0.02463641 = sum of:
        0.02463641 = product of:
          0.04927282 = sum of:
            0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04927282 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.01
    0.010945019 = product of:
      0.021890039 = sum of:
        0.021890039 = product of:
          0.043780077 = sum of:
            0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043780077 = score(doc=4788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
  14. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.01
    0.010558461 = product of:
      0.021116922 = sum of:
        0.021116922 = product of:
          0.042233843 = sum of:
            0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042233843 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004) 0.01
    0.010319063 = product of:
      0.020638127 = sum of:
        0.020638127 = product of:
          0.041276254 = sum of:
            0.041276254 = weight(_text_:organization in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041276254 = score(doc=2615,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.22283478 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine