Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frické, M."
  1. Frické, M.: Logic and librarianship (2017) 0.03
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = product of:
          0.10215352 = sum of:
            0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10215352 = score(doc=3504,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Frické, M.: Boolean logic (2021) 0.03
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = product of:
          0.10215352 = sum of:
            0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10215352 = score(doc=231,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article describes and explains Boolean logic (or Boolean algebra) in its two principal forms: that of truth-values and the Boolean connectives and, or, and not, and that of set membership and the set operations of intersection, union and complement. The main application areas of Boolean logic to know­ledge organization, namely post-coordinate indexing and search, are introduced and discussed. Some wider application areas are briefly mentioned, such as: propositional logic, the Shannon-style approach to electrical switching and logic gates, computer programming languages, probability theory, and database queries. An analysis is offered of shortcomings that Boolean logic has in terms of potential uses in know­ledge organization.
    Series
    Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 48(2021) no.2, S.177-191
  3. Frické, M.: ¬The knowledge pyramid : the DIKW hierarchy (2019) 0.02
    0.022116886 = product of:
      0.044233773 = sum of:
        0.044233773 = product of:
          0.088467546 = sum of:
            0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088467546 = score(doc=4639,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy or pyramid is a model or construct that has been used widely within information science and knowledge management. The nature of the pyramid is explained, and its historical origin is described. The conceptual components of the pyramid-i.e. data, information, knowledge, and wisdom-are given brief explication. Some modern developments, criticisms, and rebuttals of the DIKW Pyramid are described. Nowadays, the DIKW Pyramid would generally be considered to be unsatisfactory. The arguments and reasoning behind this conclusion are sketched. It is claimed that two more concepts, document and sign, are necessary to provide a fruitful theoretical frame for knowledge organization.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.1, S.33-46
  4. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.02
    0.019153783 = product of:
      0.038307566 = sum of:
        0.038307566 = product of:
          0.07661513 = sum of:
            0.07661513 = weight(_text_:organization in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07661513 = score(doc=1782,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.41361594 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
  5. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.01
    0.01289883 = product of:
      0.02579766 = sum of:
        0.02579766 = product of:
          0.05159532 = sum of:
            0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05159532 = score(doc=3183,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
    Source
    ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, ed. by B. Hjoerland. [http://www.isko.org/cyclo/logical_division]
  6. Frické, M.: Faceted classification, analysis and search : some questions on their interrelations (2017) 0.01
    0.010945019 = product of:
      0.021890039 = sum of:
        0.021890039 = product of:
          0.043780077 = sum of:
            0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043780077 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.6, S.387-396
  7. Frické, M.: Faceted classification : orthogonal facets and graphs of foci? (2011) 0.01
    0.00912085 = product of:
      0.0182417 = sum of:
        0.0182417 = product of:
          0.0364834 = sum of:
            0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0364834 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.6, S.491-502