Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

0.060753133 = product of:
  0.12150627 = sum of:
    0.12150627 = sum of:
      0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.072233446 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04927282 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.029186718 = product of:
  0.058373436 = sum of:
    0.058373436 = product of:
      0.11674687 = sum of:
        0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11674687 = score(doc=4746,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.02463641 = product of:
  0.04927282 = sum of:
    0.04927282 = product of:
      0.09854564 = sum of:
        0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09854564 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194

0.020638127 = product of:
  0.041276254 = sum of:
    0.041276254 = product of:
      0.08255251 = sum of:
        0.08255251 = weight(_text_:organization in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08255251 = score(doc=227,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-4/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-4.

Source

Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.4, S.257 - 272

0.014077948 = product of:
  0.028155897 = sum of:
    0.028155897 = product of:
      0.056311794 = sum of:
        0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056311794 = score(doc=3607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.01289883 = product of:
  0.02579766 = sum of:
    0.02579766 = product of:
      0.05159532 = sum of:
        0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05159532 = score(doc=5755,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Derived from the article of similar title in the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization Version 1.1 (= 1.0 plus details on electrophones and Wikipedia); version 1.0 published 2019-01-17, this version 2019-05-29. Article category: KOS, specific (domain specific). The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, as well as the editor, Professor Birger Hjørland, for all of his insightful comments and ideas.

Source

Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.1, S.72-91

0.01289883 = product of:
  0.02579766 = sum of:
    0.02579766 = product of:
      0.05159532 = sum of:
        0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05159532 = score(doc=212,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The classification of Western art music is a complex area of knowledge organization, yet the reasons for those complexities have not been fully studied. This research dissects the concept of orthogonality, in particular regard to music classification. Orthogonality (antonym: dependency) means that one facet acts independently from another facet. Although orthogonality is an assumed quality of facets, it has attracted relatively little attention in knowledge organization discourse. This research utilizes bibliographic classification schemes, musicological writings, and musical works to analyze orthogonality in music classification. The relationships between the medium, form/genre, and function facets are unpicked and a strong dependency is found between these facets. Whether this orthogonality exists as a construct of faceted classification or stems from the domain knowledge is explored. Furthermore, the analysis initiates new thinking about the general concept of orthogonality. The idea of a spectrum of dependency is proposed. In addition, novel, orthogonality-derived phenomena are discussed-"dynamic facets" and "meta-dependency"-where the boundary between what is and is not a facet is blurred. The concluding model visualizes the chain of dependencies between music facets, ultimately showing how the lack of orthogonality plays a key role in the complexity and issues found in music classification.

0.010945019 = product of:
  0.021890039 = sum of:
    0.021890039 = product of:
      0.043780077 = sum of:
        0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043780077 = score(doc=4886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.6, S.530-540

0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.6, S.405-415

0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Scientific classification is an important topic in contemporary knowledge organization discourse, yet the nature of the relationships between scientific and bibliographic classifications has not been fully studied. This article considers the connections between scientific and bibliographic classifications for music, taking general discourse about scientific classification and domain analysis as its starting point. Three relationship characteristics are posited: similarity, causation, and time. In discussions about similarity, "accords" and "discords" are analyzed. Further, the idea of a scale of accord is introduced, and issues with assuming a univocal scientific or bibliographic classification of music are discussed. Causation and the idea of influence between scientific and bibliographic classifications for music are unpicked. The connections between accordance and influence are explored, and the concept of differing purposes for different classification approaches is analyzed. A temporal dimension is considered, and the dynamic nature of connections between music scientific and bibliographic classifications is established. The idea of bifurcation is introduced-a change of accordance over time-which is prominent for musical instrument classification. The concluding model visualizes similarity, causation and temporal aspects as three dimensions, showing how scientific and bibliographic classifications for music are connected through a set of interconnected and complex relationships.

0.0072966795 = product of:
  0.014593359 = sum of:
    0.014593359 = product of:
      0.029186718 = sum of:
        0.029186718 = weight(_text_:organization in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029186718 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.15756798 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the classification of musical medium, which is a critical part of music classification. It considers how musical medium is currently classified, provides a theoretical understanding of what is currently problematic, and proposes a model which rethinks the classification of medium and resolves these issues. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is drawn from existing classification schemes, additionally using musicological and knowledge organization literature where relevant. The paper culminates in the design of a model of musical medium. Findings The analysis elicits sub-facets, orders and categorizations of medium: there is a strict categorization between vocal and instrumental music, a categorization based on broad size, and important sub-facets for multiples, accompaniment and arrangement. Problematically, there is a mismatch between the definitiveness of library and information science vocal/instrumental categorization and the blurred nature of real musical works; arrangements and accompaniments are limited by other categorizations; multiple voices and groups are not accommodated. So, a model with a radical new structure is proposed which resolves these classification issues. Research limitations/implications The results could be used to further understanding of music classification generally, for Western art music and other types of music. Practical implications The resulting model could be used to improve and design new classification schemes and to improve understanding of music retrieval. Originality/value Deep theoretical analysis of music classification is rare, so this paper's approach is original. Furthermore, the paper's value lies in studying a vital area of music classification which is not currently understood, and providing explanations and solutions. The proposed model is novel in structure and concept, and its original structure could be adapted for other knotty subjects.