Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.09 
    0.08601392 = product of:
  0.17202784 = sum of:
    0.17202784 = sum of:
      0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087560154 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08446769 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Beitrag anläßlich des Seminars "Tools for knowledge organization - ISKO UK Seminar", 4. September 2007.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.03 
    0.028552776 = product of:
  0.057105552 = sum of:
    0.057105552 = product of:
      0.114211105 = sum of:
        0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114211105 = score(doc=4647,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.6, S.500-516
  3. Bullard, J.: Curated Folksonomies : three implementations of structure through human judgment (2018) 0.03 
    0.028552776 = product of:
  0.057105552 = sum of:
    0.057105552 = product of:
      0.114211105 = sum of:
        0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114211105 = score(doc=5002,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Traditional knowledge organization approaches struggle to make large user-generated collections navigable, especially when these collections are quickly growing, in which currency is of particular concern, for which professional classification design is too costly. Many of these collections use folksonomies for labelling and organization as a low-cost but flawed knowledge organization approach. While several computational approaches offer ways to ameliorate the worst flaws of folksonomies, some user-generated collections have implemented a human judgment-centered alternative to produce structured folksonomies. An analysis of three such implementations reveals design differences within the space. This approach, termed "curated folksonomy," presents a new object of study for knowledge organization and represents one answer to the tension between scalability and the value of human judgment.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.8, S.643-652
  4. Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011) 0.02 
    0.022116886 = product of:
  0.044233773 = sum of:
    0.044233773 = product of:
      0.088467546 = sum of:
        0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088467546 = score(doc=4553,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    While the organization and representation of information and knowledge have historically been done by professionals, the rise of social media has spread the notion that this can be done more collaboratively. A more collaborative approach would entail a change in the role of professionals and in the goals and values of the systems. This paper explores the notion of authority and the role of professionals in a changing environment where more people participate in the organization and representation of information and knowledge. The paper questions the traditional role of the professionals and argues that systems must be designed to facilitate trust and authority, and that the authority of folksonomies and systems comes from the users' collective interpretations and meaning production.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.2, S.114-122
  5. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.02 
    0.022116886 = product of:
  0.044233773 = sum of:
    0.044233773 = product of:
      0.088467546 = sum of:
        0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088467546 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.13
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  6. Huvila, I.: Aesthetic judgments in folksonomies as criteria for organising knowledge 0.02 
    0.018058361 = product of:
  0.036116723 = sum of:
    0.036116723 = product of:
      0.072233446 = sum of:
        0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072233446 = score(doc=3540,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  7. Goodrum, A.; Hibbard, C.E.; Fels, C.D.; Woodcock, C.K.: ¬The creation of keysigns : American sign language metadata (2008) 0.02 
    0.015478596 = product of:
  0.030957192 = sum of:
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061914384 = score(doc=2272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  8. Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.01 
    0.014593359 = product of:
  0.029186718 = sum of:
    0.029186718 = product of:
      0.058373436 = sum of:
        0.058373436 = weight(_text_:organization in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058373436 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  9. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.01 
    0.01289883 = product of:
  0.02579766 = sum of:
    0.02579766 = product of:
      0.05159532 = sum of:
        0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05159532 = score(doc=421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_g.pdf.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.5, S.356-362
  10. Noruzi, A.: Folksonomies : (un)controlled vocabulary? (2006) 0.01 
    0.01276919 = product of:
  0.02553838 = sum of:
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = weight(_text_:organization in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05107676 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 33(2006) no.4, S.199-203
  11. Spiteri, L.F.: Incorporating facets into social tagging applications : an analysis of current trends (2010) 0.01 
    0.01276919 = product of:
  0.02553838 = sum of:
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = weight(_text_:organization in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05107676 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An increasingly difficult challenge in social tagging applications is negotiating the number of existing tags. This article examines the use of facets to facilitate the efficient organization and browsing of tags into manageable and distinct categories. Current and proposed methodologies for the application of facets in social tagging applications are evaluated. Results of this analysis indicate that these methodologies provide insufficient guidelines for the choice, evaluation, and maintenance of the facets. Suggestions are made to guide the design of a more rigorous methodology for the application of facets to social tagging applications.
  12. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01 
    0.012443266 = product of:
  0.024886532 = sum of:
    0.024886532 = product of:
      0.049773064 = sum of:
        0.049773064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049773064 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  13. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01 
    0.012318205 = product of:
  0.02463641 = sum of:
    0.02463641 = product of:
      0.04927282 = sum of:
        0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04927282 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  14. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.010558461 = product of:
  0.021116922 = sum of:
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042233843 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  15. Munk, T.B.; Mork, K.: Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort (2007) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.1, S.16-33
  16. Munk, T.B.; Moerk, K.: Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies : an empirical study (2007) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.3, S.115-127
  17. Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.4, S.307-317
  18. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.6, S.515-529
  19. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
  20. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.01 
    0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.7, S.574-585

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 22
  • d 1
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes