Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.06
    0.060753133 = product of:
      0.12150627 = sum of:
        0.12150627 = sum of:
          0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072233446 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  2. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.05
    0.052074112 = product of:
      0.104148224 = sum of:
        0.104148224 = sum of:
          0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061914384 = score(doc=780,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  3. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.04
    0.04300696 = product of:
      0.08601392 = sum of:
        0.08601392 = sum of:
          0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043780077 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.3, S.209-215
  4. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.04
    0.04300696 = product of:
      0.08601392 = sum of:
        0.08601392 = sum of:
          0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043780077 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.638-643
  5. Goldberg, J.E.: Library of Congress Classification : shelving device for collections or organization of knowledge fields? (1996) 0.03
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = product of:
          0.1263822 = sum of:
            0.1263822 = weight(_text_:organization in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1263822 = score(doc=4579,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.68228936 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  6. Hug, H.: Walser, M. : Retrieval in the ETH database using the UDC (1991) 0.03
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = product of:
          0.12382877 = sum of:
            0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12382877 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; Vol.2
    Source
    Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface. Proc. 1st Int. ISKO-Conf., Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Ed. R. Fugmann. Vol.2
  7. Riesthuis, G.J.A..: Conversion from precoordinated classified catalogues to postcoordinated keyword catalogues (1994) 0.03
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = product of:
          0.12382877 = sum of:
            0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 7737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12382877 = score(doc=7737,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 7737, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  8. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.03
    0.028929014 = product of:
      0.057858028 = sum of:
        0.057858028 = sum of:
          0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043780077 = score(doc=2047,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.014077948 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014077948 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
    PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
  9. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.028155897 = product of:
      0.056311794 = sum of:
        0.056311794 = product of:
          0.11262359 = sum of:
            0.11262359 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11262359 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  10. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.03
    0.02579766 = product of:
      0.05159532 = sum of:
        0.05159532 = product of:
          0.10319064 = sum of:
            0.10319064 = weight(_text_:organization in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319064 = score(doc=4578,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.55708694 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  11. Ishikawa, T.; Nakamura, H.; Nakamura, Y.: UDC number automatic combination system (1994) 0.02
    0.022116886 = product of:
      0.044233773 = sum of:
        0.044233773 = product of:
          0.088467546 = sum of:
            0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 7732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088467546 = score(doc=7732,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 7732, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In a large-scale classification system, such as UDC, users are often troubled during the process of finding a relevant classification number for his concept or term and producing (combining) a final compound classification number. UDC tables are now computerized in many language editions, and the MRF had released as a master file (database) by the UDCC in 1993. In this paper, a system function is described for a man-machine interactive system to support compound UDC number assignment, and the necessary re-organization of UDC data/file formats are considered for the use in the automatic classification number combination
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  12. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = product of:
          0.08446769 = sum of:
            0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08446769 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  13. Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998) 0.02
    0.020638127 = product of:
      0.041276254 = sum of:
        0.041276254 = product of:
          0.08255251 = sum of:
            0.08255251 = weight(_text_:organization in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08255251 = score(doc=5443,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that classification systems have an important role to play in knowledge organization in the new world electronic order. The natural language approach is not incompatible with the use of a classification system and classification has untapped potential as a multilingual switching language. Librarians must learn to present classification systems in a language understood by a general audience and promote them as general knowledge organization tools
  14. McKiernan, G.: Parallel universe : the organization of information elements and access in a World Wide Web (WWW) Virtual Library (1996) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=5184,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  15. Saeed, H.; Chaudry, A.S.: Potential of bibliographic tools to organize knowledge on the Internet : the use of Dewey Decimal classification scheme for organizing Web-based information resources (2001) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=6739,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Possibilities are being explored to use traditional bibliographic tools, like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), to improve the organization of information resources on the Internet. The most recent edition of DDC, with its enhanced features, has greater potential than other traditional approaches. A review of selected Web sites that use DDC to organize Web resources indicates, however, that the full potential of the DDC scheme for this purpose has not been realized. While the review found that the DDC classification structure was more effective when compared with other knowledge organization systems, we conclude that DDC needs to be further enhanced to make it more suitable for this application. As widely reported in the professional literature, OCLC has conducted research on the potential of DDC for organizing Web resources. Such research, however, is experimental and should be supplemented by empirical studies with user participation.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.1, S.17-26
  16. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=942,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Increased Importance of Knowledge Organization in Internet Services - 2. Quality Subject Service and the role of classification - 3. Developing the DDC into a knowledge organization instrument for the digital library. OCLC site - 4. DESIRE's Barefoot Solutions of Automatic Classification - 5. Advanced Classification Solutions in DESIRE and CORC - 6. Future directions of research and development - 7. General references
  17. Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.: Integrating faceted structure into the search process (2004) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The nature of search requirements is perceived to be changing, fuelled by a growing dissatisfaction with the marginal accuracy and often overwhelming quantity of results from simple keyword matching techniques. Traditional search interfaces fail to acknowledge and utilise the implicit underlying structure present within a typical keyword query. Faceted structure can (and should) perform a significant role in this area - acting as the basis for mediation between searcher and indexer, and guiding query formulation and reformulation by interactively educating the user about the native domain. This paper discusses the possible benefits of applying faceted knowledge organization systems to enhance query structure, query visualisation and the overall query process, drawing an the outcomes of a recently completed research project.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  18. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.02
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = product of:
          0.0729668 = sum of:
            0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729668 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Faceted classification of information (o.J.) 0.02
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = product of:
          0.0729668 = sum of:
            0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729668 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An explanation of faceted classification meant for people working in knowledge management. An example given for a high-technology company has the fundamental categories Products, Applications, Organizations, People, Domain objects ("technologies applied in the marketplace in which the organization participates"), Events (i.e. time), and Publications.
  20. Hennecke, J.: Workshop DDC and Knowledge Organization in the Digital Library (2000) 0.02
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = product of:
          0.0729668 = sum of:
            0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 4742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729668 = score(doc=4742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 4742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 84
  • d 7
  • es 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 82
  • el 9
  • m 4
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…