Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.05
    0.050174788 = product of:
      0.100349575 = sum of:
        0.100349575 = sum of:
          0.05107676 = weight(_text_:organization in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05107676 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  2. Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967) 0.03
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = product of:
          0.10215352 = sum of:
            0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10215352 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02
    0.02463641 = product of:
      0.04927282 = sum of:
        0.04927282 = product of:
          0.09854564 = sum of:
            0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09854564 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  4. Green, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge : an overview (2001) 0.02
    0.022116886 = product of:
      0.044233773 = sum of:
        0.044233773 = product of:
          0.088467546 = sum of:
            0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088467546 = score(doc=1142,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Relationships are specified by simultaneously identifying a semantic relationship and the set of participants involved in it, pairing each participant with its role in the relationship. Properties pertaining to the participant set and the nature of the relationship are explored. Relationships in the organization of knowledge are surveyed, encompassing relationships between units of recorded knowledge based an descriptions of those units; intratextual and intertextual relationships, including relationships based an text structure, citation relationships, and hypertext links; subject relationships in thesauri and other classificatory structures, including relationships for literature-based knowledge discovery; and relevance relationships.
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  5. Subject indexing systems : concepts, methods and techniques (1998) 0.02
    0.021890039 = product of:
      0.043780077 = sum of:
        0.043780077 = product of:
          0.087560154 = sum of:
            0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087560154 = score(doc=6022,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.177-178 (M.P. Satija)
  6. Marcoux, Y.; Rizkallah, E.: Knowledge organization in the light of intertextual semantics : a natural-language analysis of controlled vocabularies (2008) 0.02
    0.021890039 = product of:
      0.043780077 = sum of:
        0.043780077 = product of:
          0.087560154 = sum of:
            0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 2241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087560154 = score(doc=2241,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 2241, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Intertextual semantics is a semiotics-based approach to the design of communication artefacts primarily aimed at modeling XML structured documents. SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) is a specification currently under development at the W3C that allows expressing various types of controlled vocabularies in XML. In this article, we show through an example how intertextual semantics could be applied to controlled vocabularies expressed in SKOS, and argue that it could facilitate the communication of meaning among the various persons who interact with a controlled vocabulary.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  7. Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990) 0.02
    0.020638127 = product of:
      0.041276254 = sum of:
        0.041276254 = product of:
          0.08255251 = sum of:
            0.08255251 = weight(_text_:organization in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08255251 = score(doc=4781,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.1
    Source
    Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface. Proceedings of the 1st International ISKO Conference, Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Pt.1
  8. Green, R.; Fraser, L.: Patterns in verbal polysemy (2004) 0.02
    0.020638127 = product of:
      0.041276254 = sum of:
        0.041276254 = product of:
          0.08255251 = sum of:
            0.08255251 = weight(_text_:organization in 2621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08255251 = score(doc=2621,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 2621, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  9. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.02
    0.019909225 = product of:
      0.03981845 = sum of:
        0.03981845 = product of:
          0.0796369 = sum of:
            0.0796369 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0796369 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  10. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=1680,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Last word ontological thought and practice is exemplified on an axiomatic framework [a model for an Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO), cf. Poli, R., Schmitz-Esser, W., forthcoming 2007] that is highly general, based on natural language, multilingual, can be implemented as topic maps and may be openly enhanced by software available for particular languages. Basics of ontological modelling, conditions for construction and maintenance, and the most salient points in application are addressed, such as cross-language text mining and knowledge generation. The rationale is to open the eyes for the tremendous potential of terminology-based ontologies for principled Knowledge Organization and the interchange and reuse of formalized knowledge.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  11. Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.02
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = product of:
          0.0729668 = sum of:
            0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729668 = score(doc=1139,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With fourteen contributions grouped in two sections, "Theoretical background" and "Systems", this work discusses the most common relationships used in the organization of recorded knowledge to facilitate information retrieval: the relationships between bibliographic entities, intra- and intertextual relationships, relevance relationships, and subject relationships in thesauri and other classificatory structures. The editors' goal is to "spur further interest, debate, research, and development".
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.208-210 (S. Betrand-Gastaldy)
  12. Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003) 0.02
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = product of:
          0.0729668 = sum of:
            0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729668 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  13. Barite, M.G.: ¬The notion of "category" : its implications in subject analysis and in the construction and evaluation of indexing languages (2000) 0.02
    0.018058361 = product of:
      0.036116723 = sum of:
        0.036116723 = product of:
          0.072233446 = sum of:
            0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 6036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072233446 = score(doc=6036,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 6036, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The notion of category, from Aristotle and Kant to the present time, has been used as a basic intellectual tool for the analysis of the existence and changeableness of things. Ranganathan was the first to extrapolate the concept into the Theory of Classification, placing it as an essential axis for the logical organization of knowledge and the construction of indexing languages. This paper proposes a conceptual and methodological reexamination of the notion of category from a functional and instrumental perspective, and tries to clarify the essential characters of categories in that context, and their present implications regarding the construction and evaluation of indexing languages
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 27(2000) nos.1/2, S.4-10
  14. Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998) 0.02
    0.018058361 = product of:
      0.036116723 = sum of:
        0.036116723 = product of:
          0.072233446 = sum of:
            0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072233446 = score(doc=42,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  15. Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008) 0.02
    0.018058361 = product of:
      0.036116723 = sum of:
        0.036116723 = product of:
          0.072233446 = sum of:
            0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072233446 = score(doc=1593,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established - but in a way restricted and vague - relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
  16. Szostak, R.: Toward a classification of relationships (2012) 0.02
    0.018058361 = product of:
      0.036116723 = sum of:
        0.036116723 = product of:
          0.072233446 = sum of:
            0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072233446 = score(doc=131,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Several attempts have been made to develop a classification of relationships, but none of these have been widely accepted or applied within information science. It would seem that information scientists, while appreciating the potential value of a classification of relationships, have found all previous classifications to be too complicated in application relative to the benefits they provide. This paper begins by reviewing previous attempts and drawing lessons from these. It then surveys a range of sources within and beyond the field of knowledge organization that can together provide the basis for the development of a novel classification of relationships. One critical insight is that relationships governing causation/influence should be accorded priority.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.2, S.83-94
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02
    0.017597437 = product of:
      0.035194874 = sum of:
        0.035194874 = product of:
          0.07038975 = sum of:
            0.07038975 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07038975 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  18. Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008) 0.02
    0.015478596 = product of:
      0.030957192 = sum of:
        0.030957192 = product of:
          0.061914384 = sum of:
            0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061914384 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  19. Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998) 0.02
    0.015478596 = product of:
      0.030957192 = sum of:
        0.030957192 = product of:
          0.061914384 = sum of:
            0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061914384 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  20. Wu, Y.; Yang, L.: Construction and evaluation of an oil spill semantic relation taxonomy for supporting knowledge discovery (2015) 0.02
    0.015478596 = product of:
      0.030957192 = sum of:
        0.030957192 = product of:
          0.061914384 = sum of:
            0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061914384 = score(doc=2202,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Papers from the Fifth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2015), sponsored by ISKO-Canada/US, June 18-19, 2015, Los Angeles, California. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_4.pdf.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.4, S.222-231