Bourke, P.; Butler, L.: Publication types, citation rates and evaluation (1996)
0.03
0.028273653 = product of:
0.056547306 = sum of:
0.056547306 = product of:
0.11309461 = sum of:
0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 7188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11309461 = score(doc=7188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Argues for the need to bring the total research output of substantial institutions and system under bibliographic control, noting that this aim has rarely been met. Discusses the Research Evaluation and Policy Project (REPP) at the Australian National University (ANU) which has etsablished a database covering all the publications of the Institute of Advanced Dtudies of the ANU, as well as examining corresponding citations. Describes the usefulness of the database in examining whether the citation record of research publications appearing in journals indexed by the ISI is a useable surrogate for the citation record within ISI journals of all models of publication. Contends that, if certain preconditions are met, the choice of citation rate is not critical
