Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sugimoto, C.R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Yan, E.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Institutional interactions : exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks (2011) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The objective of this research is to examine the interaction of institutions, based on their citation and collaboration networks. The domain of library and information science is examined, using data from 1965-2010. A linear model is formulated to explore the factors that are associated with institutional citation behaviors, using the number of citations as the dependent variable, and the number of collaborations, physical distance, and topical distance as independent variables. It is found that institutional citation behaviors are associated with social, topical, and geographical factors. Dynamically, the number of citations is becoming more associated with collaboration intensity and less dependent on the country boundary and/or physical distance. This research is informative for scientometricians and policy makers.
  2. Gazni, A.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Didegah, F.: Mapping world scientific collaboration : authors, institutions, and countries (2012) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    International collaboration is being heralded as the hallmark of contemporary scientific production. Yet little quantitative evidence has portrayed the landscape and trends of such collaboration. To this end, 14,000,000 documents indexed in Thomson Reuters's Web of Science (WoS) were studied to provide a state-of-the-art description of scientific collaborations across the world. The results indicate that the number of authors in the largest research teams have not significantly grown during the past decade; however, the number of smaller research teams has seen significant increases in growth. In terms of composition, the largest teams have become more diverse than the latter teams and tend more toward interinstitutional and international collaboration. Investigating the size of teams showed large variation between fields. Mapping scientific cooperation at the country level reveals that Western countries situated at the core of the map are extensively cooperating with each other. High-impact institutions are significantly more collaborative than others. This work should inform policy makers, administrators, and those interested in the progression of scientific collaboration.

Authors