Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Sotudeh, H.; Horri, A.: Tracking open access journals evolution : some considerations in open access data collection validation (2007) 0.04
    0.041975494 = product of:
      0.08395099 = sum of:
        0.08395099 = product of:
          0.16790198 = sum of:
            0.16790198 = weight(_text_:policy in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16790198 = score(doc=593,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the evolution of a collection of open access journals (OAJs,) indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCI; Thomson Scientific Philadelphia, PA) against four validity criteria including a free, immediate, full and constant access policy for at least 5 years. Few journals are found to be wrongly identified as OAJ or to have a dubious access policy. Some delayed journals evolved into gold OA; however, these are scarce compared to the number of journals that withdrew from gold OA to be an embargoed or a partially OAJ. A majority of the journals meet three of the criteria as they provide free and immediate access to their entire contents. Although a lot are found to follow a constant policy, a large number has an OA lifetime shorter than 5 years, due to the high frequency of newly launched or newly converted journals. That is the major factor affecting the validity of the collection. Only half of the collection meets all the requirements.
  2. Doty, P.; Bishop, A.P.: ¬The National Information Infrastructure and electronic publishing : a reflective essay (1994) 0.04
    0.03998499 = product of:
      0.07996998 = sum of:
        0.07996998 = product of:
          0.15993996 = sum of:
            0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 1058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15993996 = score(doc=1058,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 1058, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1058)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The US government has been active in the establishment of national and other levels of networking to connect various kinds of persons and groups throughout the country. Briefly examines the history and present state of federal initiatives in electronic networking (particularly the National Information Infrastructure (NII)) and the NREN. Looks at current trends and issues for electronic publishing that come from this federal activity; and identifies topics of fundamental interest to, and with major implications for, national policy that arise from electronic publishing. Explores electronic publishing in the context of federal networking initiatives and considers the implications of the growth of electronic publishing for national policy
  3. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.: ¬A "Gold-centric" implementation of open access : hybrid journals, the "Total cost of publication," and policy development in the UK and beyond (2017) 0.03
    0.034979578 = product of:
      0.069959156 = sum of:
        0.069959156 = product of:
          0.13991831 = sum of:
            0.13991831 = weight(_text_:policy in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13991831 = score(doc=3797,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5130373 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports analysis of data from higher education institutions in the UK on their experience of the open-access (OA) publishing market working within a policy environment favoring "Gold" OA (OA publishing in journals). It models the "total cost of publication"-comprising costs of journal subscriptions, OA article-processing charges (APCs), and new administrative costs-for a sample of 24 institutions. APCs are shown to constitute 12% of the "total cost of publication," APC administration, 1%, and subscriptions, 87% (for a sample of seven publishers). APC expenditure in institutions rose between 2012 and 2014 at the same time as rising subscription costs. There was disproportionately high take up of Gold options for Health and Life Sciences articles. APC prices paid varied widely, with a mean APC of £1,586 in 2014. "Hybrid" options (subscription journals also offering OA for individual articles on payment of an APC) were considerably more expensive than fully OA titles, but the data indicate a correlation between APC price and journal quality (as reflected in the citation rates of journals). The policy implications of these developments are explored, particularly in relation to hybrid OA and potential of offsetting subscription and APC costs.
  4. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03
    0.03445699 = product of:
      0.06891398 = sum of:
        0.06891398 = product of:
          0.13782796 = sum of:
            0.13782796 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13782796 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  5. Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012) 0.03
    0.034272846 = product of:
      0.06854569 = sum of:
        0.06854569 = product of:
          0.13709138 = sum of:
            0.13709138 = weight(_text_:policy in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13709138 = score(doc=2299,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.50267184 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline.
  6. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.03
    0.029237729 = product of:
      0.058475457 = sum of:
        0.058475457 = product of:
          0.116950914 = sum of:
            0.116950914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.116950914 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  7. Brown, D.J.: Electronic publishing and libraries : Planning for the impact and growth to 2003 (1996) 0.03
    0.028273653 = product of:
      0.056547306 = sum of:
        0.056547306 = product of:
          0.11309461 = sum of:
            0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11309461 = score(doc=3256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted by DJB Associates on behalf of the British Library, to forecast the future trends in electronic publishing during the period 1995 to 2003. The emphasis is on scholarly publishing and the project, initiated by the BL, Corporate Research Group, aimed to help in the BL's assessment of the acqusition policy for electronic media
  8. Fallaw, C.; Dunham, E.; Wickes, E.; Strong, D.; Stein, A.; Zhang, Q.; Rimkus, K.; ill Ingram, B.; Imker, H.J.: Overly honest data repository development (2016) 0.03
    0.028273653 = product of:
      0.056547306 = sum of:
        0.056547306 = product of:
          0.11309461 = sum of:
            0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11309461 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After a year of development, the library at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign has launched a repository, called the Illinois Data Bank (https://databank.illinois.edu/), to provide Illinois researchers with a free, self-serve publishing platform that centralizes, preserves, and provides persistent and reliable access to Illinois research data. This article presents a holistic view of development by discussing our overarching technical, policy, and interface strategies. By openly presenting our design decisions, the rationales behind those decisions, and associated challenges this paper aims to contribute to the library community's work to develop repository services that meet growing data preservation and sharing needs.
  9. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.03
    0.027565593 = product of:
      0.055131186 = sum of:
        0.055131186 = product of:
          0.11026237 = sum of:
            0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11026237 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  10. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.03
    0.027565593 = product of:
      0.055131186 = sum of:
        0.055131186 = product of:
          0.11026237 = sum of:
            0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11026237 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  11. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.03
    0.027565593 = product of:
      0.055131186 = sum of:
        0.055131186 = product of:
          0.11026237 = sum of:
            0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11026237 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  12. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024364771 = product of:
      0.048729543 = sum of:
        0.048729543 = product of:
          0.097459085 = sum of:
            0.097459085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097459085 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  13. Collins, H.M.; Reyes-Galindo, L.; Ginsparg, P.: ¬A note concerning primary source knowledge (2017) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present the results of running 4 different papers through the automated filtering system used by the open access preprint server "arXiv" to classify papers and implement quality control barriers. The exercise was carried out in order to assess whether these highly sophisticated, state-of-the-art filters can distinguish between papers that are controversial or have gone past their "sell-by date," and otherwise normal papers. We conclude that not even the arXiv filters, which are otherwise successful in filtering fringe-topic papers, can fully acquire "Domain-Specific Discrimination" and thus distinguish technical papers that are taken seriously by an expert community from those that are not. Finally, we discuss the implications this has for citizen and policy-maker engagement with the Primary Source Knowledge of a technical domain.
  14. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
  15. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  16. Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
  17. Harter, S.P.; Park, T.K.: Impact of prior electronic publication on manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals (2000) 0.02
    0.022848563 = product of:
      0.045697127 = sum of:
        0.045697127 = product of:
          0.09139425 = sum of:
            0.09139425 = weight(_text_:policy in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09139425 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.33511457 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to study current policies and practices of scholarly journals on evaluating manuscripts for publication that had been previously published electronically. Various electronic forms were considered: a manuscript having been e-mailed to members of a listserv, attached to a personal or institutional home page, stored in an electronic preprint collection, or published in an electronic proceedings or electronic journal. Factors that might affect the consideration of such manuscripts were also examined, including characteristics of the journal, the previously published work, and the submitted manuscript. A sample of 202 scholarly journals in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities was selected for study. A questionnaire and cover letters were sent to the journal editors in the summer and fall of 1997, with an overall return rate of 57.4%. Results are reported for all journals, with comparisons being made between journals edited in the Unites States and outside the Unites States, by journal impact factor, and by discipline. The findings suggest that editorial policies regarding prior electronic publication are in an early stage of development. Most journal editors do not have a formal policy regarding the evaluation of work previously published in electronic form, nor are they currently evaluating such a policy. Editors disagreed widely on the importance of the various factors that might affect their decision to consider a work previously published electronically. The form or type of prior electronic publication was an important variable. Although some editors currently have a fairly rigid and negative posture towards work previously published electronically, most are willing to consider certain forms of such work for publication in their journals. Probably the most significant results of the study were the many differences in practices among scholarly disciplines. The findings of this study reveal how the Internet and the World Wide Web are currently affecting manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals at this early stage of Web and Internet publishing
  18. Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998) 0.02
    0.020674193 = product of:
      0.041348387 = sum of:
        0.041348387 = product of:
          0.08269677 = sum of:
            0.08269677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08269677 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
  19. Friesel, U.: ¬Das Buch wie Cola aus dem Automaten : Book-on-Demand: Gedruckt aus dem Internet, was gewünscht wird, und zwar sofort (1999) 0.02
    0.020674193 = product of:
      0.041348387 = sum of:
        0.041348387 = product of:
          0.08269677 = sum of:
            0.08269677 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08269677 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  20. Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000) 0.02
    0.020674193 = product of:
      0.041348387 = sum of:
        0.041348387 = product of:
          0.08269677 = sum of:
            0.08269677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08269677 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.10.2001 12:22:54

Years

Languages

  • d 46
  • e 44

Types

  • a 83
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • More… Less…