Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.09
    0.092191085 = product of:
      0.18438217 = sum of:
        0.18438217 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  2. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.08
    0.0806672 = product of:
      0.1613344 = sum of:
        0.1613344 = sum of:
          0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11309461 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  3. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.08
    0.0806672 = product of:
      0.1613344 = sum of:
        0.1613344 = sum of:
          0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11309461 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
    Source
    Internet research. Electronic networking applications and policy. 8(1998) no.5, S.377-386
  4. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.05
    0.046095543 = product of:
      0.092191085 = sum of:
        0.092191085 = sum of:
          0.064625494 = weight(_text_:policy in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064625494 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027565593 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  5. Colati, J.B.; Dean, R.; Maull, K.: Describing digital objects : a tale of compromises (2009) 0.04
    0.03998499 = product of:
      0.07996998 = sum of:
        0.07996998 = product of:
          0.15993996 = sum of:
            0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15993996 = score(doc=2983,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Alliance Digital Repository (ADR) is a consortial digital repository service developed by Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries (Alliance). This paper details how a standard descriptive metadata policy for repository records developed, and how that policy is currently being implemented. All digital objects in the ADR are required to have MODS and OAI-Dublin Core metadata that conform to certain minimum requirements. To help members meet the requirements, Alliance staff and the ADR Metadata Working Group, using tools available in the Fedora/Fez repository environment, have developed a customized set of core ADR material type templates in XSD form.
  6. Brodie, M.: In the company of strangers : challenges and opportunities in metadata implementation (1997) 0.03
    0.032312747 = product of:
      0.064625494 = sum of:
        0.064625494 = product of:
          0.12925099 = sum of:
            0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12925099 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines some important policy level issues which impact on the implementation of metadata systems at the State Library of New South Wales. The issues present challenges and opportunities for the establishment of a new 'digital' library identity and for the forging of new 'digital' relationships with client groups and with other cultural, educational, government and commercial institutions
  7. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.03
    0.032312747 = product of:
      0.064625494 = sum of:
        0.064625494 = product of:
          0.12925099 = sum of:
            0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12925099 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Maule, R.W.: Cognitive maps, AI agents and personalized virtual environments in Internet learning experiences (1998) 0.03
    0.032312747 = product of:
      0.064625494 = sum of:
        0.064625494 = product of:
          0.12925099 = sum of:
            0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 5221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12925099 = score(doc=5221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 5221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Internet research. Electronic networking applications and policy. 8(1998) no.4, S.347-358
  9. Laczny, J.: Fit for Purpose : Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten (2021) 0.03
    0.032312747 = product of:
      0.064625494 = sum of:
        0.064625494 = product of:
          0.12925099 = sum of:
            0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12925099 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Folgenden soll der Frage nachgegangen werden, inwiefern Bibliotheken den Qualitätsanspruch an inhaltserschließende Informationen von Ressourcen durch die Formulierung und Veröffentlichung einer bibliotheksspezifischen, übergeordneten Metadaten-Richtlinie bzw. -Policy - auch im Sinne einer Transparenzoffensive - und deren Anwendung beeinflussen können.
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029237729 = product of:
      0.058475457 = sum of:
        0.058475457 = product of:
          0.116950914 = sum of:
            0.116950914 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.116950914 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. Laparra, E.; Binford-Walsh, A.; Emerson, K.; Miller, M.L.; López-Hoffman, L.; Currim, F.; Bethard, S.: Addressing structural hurdles for metadata extraction from environmental impact statements (2023) 0.03
    0.028560705 = product of:
      0.05712141 = sum of:
        0.05712141 = product of:
          0.11424282 = sum of:
            0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11424282 = score(doc=1042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Natural language processing techniques can be used to analyze the linguistic content of a document to extract missing pieces of metadata. However, accurate metadata extraction may not depend solely on the linguistics, but also on structural problems such as extremely large documents, unordered multi-file documents, and inconsistency in manually labeled metadata. In this work, we start from two standard machine learning solutions to extract pieces of metadata from Environmental Impact Statements, environmental policy documents that are regularly produced under the US National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. We present a series of experiments where we evaluate how these standard approaches are affected by different issues derived from real-world data. We find that metadata extraction can be strongly influenced by nonlinguistic factors such as document length and volume ordering and that the standard machine learning solutions often do not scale well to long documents. We demonstrate how such solutions can be better adapted to these scenarios, and conclude with suggestions for other NLP practitioners cataloging large document collections.
  12. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.027565593 = product of:
      0.055131186 = sum of:
        0.055131186 = product of:
          0.11026237 = sum of:
            0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11026237 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.027565593 = product of:
      0.055131186 = sum of:
        0.055131186 = product of:
          0.11026237 = sum of:
            0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11026237 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. Andresen, L.: Standardisation of Dublin Core in Europe (2000) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=4454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is developed in an open consensus building environment and has also succeeded in many countries and in many domains. The idea of Dublin Core was to establish a de facto standard for metadata for discovery. There is a natural development from de facto standards to formal standards. A very important detail of formal standardisation is the stability and the credibility of an official standard. That was the background for the metadata policy of The Danish National Library Authority, agreed upon in Dec 1997. We decided to work for a formal standardisation of Dublin Core. there was - and is - a need for standardised method of describing Internet resources. And at that time Dublin core seemed to be the best bid for a metadata schema. It was not very widely used in practice, but Dublin Core was what people were talking about
  15. Brownlee, R.: Research data and repository metadata : policy and technical issues at the University of Sydney Library (2009) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Haynes, D.: Metadata for information management and retrieval : understanding metadata and its use (2018) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=4096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This new and updated second edition of a classic text provides a thought-provoking introduction to metadata for all library and information students and professionals. Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval has been fully revised by David Haynes to bring it up to date with new technology and standards. The new edition, containing new chapters on Metadata Standards and Encoding Schemes, assesses the current theory and practice of metadata and examines key developments in terms of both policy and technology. Coverage includes: an introduction to the concept of metadata a description of the main components of metadata systems and standards an overview of the scope of metadata and its applications a description of typical information retrieval issues in corporate and research environments a demonstration of ways in which metadata is used to improve retrieval a look at ways in which metadata is used to manage information consideration of the role of metadata in information governance.
  17. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  18. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  19. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = product of:
          0.09647957 = sum of:
            0.09647957 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09647957 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  20. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.020674193 = product of:
      0.041348387 = sum of:
        0.041348387 = product of:
          0.08269677 = sum of:
            0.08269677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08269677 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 81
  • d 11
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…