Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Rowlands, I.: Understanding information policy : concepts, frameworks and research tools (1996) 0.16
```
0.15776558 = product of:
  0.31553116 = sum of:
    0.31553116 = sum of:
      0.27418277 = weight(_text_:policy in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27418277 = score(doc=4339,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          1.0053437 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041348387 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This paper considers the need for a more systematic and critical approach to the academic study of information policy at national and international level. It reviews the complex, multifaceted nature of large-scale information policy problems and considers some of the main sources of confusion in the journal literature. It is argued that while information policy has been largey technology-driven, the consideration of information policy has, for historical reasons, typically been discipline-bounded. This has contributed to a fragmentation of research effort and a lack of consensus on the most appropriate home discipline for the study of information policy. In the search for a more critical scientific understanding of information policy issues, a brief review is made of the strenghts, limitations and applicability of the broad theoretical and methodological approaches which have been adopted, often implicitly, by writers reporting in the library and information science literature. The paper concludes with a consideration of some desirable characteristics for the design of information policy studies

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.13-25

Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.01

0.012059947 = product of:
  0.024119893 = sum of:
    0.024119893 = product of:
      0.048239786 = sum of:
        0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048239786 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 21. 1.2007 12:03:22