-
Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013)
0.07
0.07434991 = product of:
0.14869982 = sum of:
0.14869982 = sum of:
0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11424282 = score(doc=668,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03445699 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 20th century massification of higher education and research in academia is said to have produced structurally stratified higher education systems in many countries. Most manifestly, the research mission of universities appears to be divisive. Authors have claimed that the Swedish system, while formally unified, has developed into a binary state, and statistics seem to support this conclusion. This article makes use of a comprehensive statistical data source on Swedish higher education institutions to illustrate stratification, and uses literature on Swedish research policy history to contextualize the statistics. Highlighting the opportunities as well as constraints of the data, the article argues that there is great merit in combining statistics with a qualitative analysis when studying the structural characteristics of national higher education systems. Not least the article shows that it is an over-simplification to describe the Swedish system as binary; the stratification is more complex. On basis of the analysis, the article also argues that while global trends certainly influence national developments, higher education systems have country-specific features that may enrich the understanding of how systems evolve and therefore should be analyzed as part of a broader study of the increasingly globalized academic system.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:43:01
-
Winterhalter, C.: Licence to mine : ein Überblick über Rahmenbedingungen von Text and Data Mining und den aktuellen Stand der Diskussion (2016)
0.03
0.032312747 = product of:
0.064625494 = sum of:
0.064625494 = product of:
0.12925099 = sum of:
0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12925099 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Möglichkeiten der Anwendung von Text and Data Mining (TDM) und ähnlichen Verfahren auf der Grundlage bestehender Regelungen in Lizenzverträgen zu kostenpflichtigen elektronischen Ressourcen, die Debatte über zusätzliche Lizenzen für TDM am Beispiel von Elseviers TDM Policy und den Stand der Diskussion über die Einführung von Schrankenregelungen im Urheberrecht für TDM zu nichtkommerziellen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken.
-
Ekbia, H.; Mattioli, M.; Kouper, I.; Arave, G.; Ghazinejad, A.; Bowman, T.; Suri, V.R.; Tsou, A.; Weingart, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Big data, bigger dilemmas : a critical review (2015)
0.03
0.028560705 = product of:
0.05712141 = sum of:
0.05712141 = product of:
0.11424282 = sum of:
0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 2155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11424282 = score(doc=2155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 2155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The recent interest in Big Data has generated a broad range of new academic, corporate, and policy practices along with an evolving debate among its proponents, detractors, and skeptics. While the practices draw on a common set of tools, techniques, and technologies, most contributions to the debate come either from a particular disciplinary perspective or with a focus on a domain-specific issue. A close examination of these contributions reveals a set of common problematics that arise in various guises and in different places. It also demonstrates the need for a critical synthesis of the conceptual and practical dilemmas surrounding Big Data. The purpose of this article is to provide such a synthesis by drawing on relevant writings in the sciences, humanities, policy, and trade literature. In bringing these diverse literatures together, we aim to shed light on the common underlying issues that concern and affect all of these areas. By contextualizing the phenomenon of Big Data within larger socioeconomic developments, we also seek to provide a broader understanding of its drivers, barriers, and challenges. This approach allows us to identify attributes of Big Data that require more attention-autonomy, opacity, generativity, disparity, and futurity-leading to questions and ideas for moving beyond dilemmas.
-
Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015)
0.01
0.008614248 = product of:
0.017228495 = sum of:
0.017228495 = product of:
0.03445699 = sum of:
0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03445699 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
-
Fonseca, F.; Marcinkowski, M.; Davis, C.: Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding (2019)
0.01
0.008614248 = product of:
0.017228495 = sum of:
0.017228495 = product of:
0.03445699 = sum of:
0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03445699 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 3.2019 16:32:22
-
Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018)
0.01
0.006891398 = product of:
0.013782796 = sum of:
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027565593 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 11:33:49
