Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.06
    0.057619434 = product of:
      0.11523887 = sum of:
        0.11523887 = sum of:
          0.08078188 = weight(_text_:policy in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08078188 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03445699 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
  2. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.06
    0.057619434 = product of:
      0.11523887 = sum of:
        0.11523887 = sum of:
          0.08078188 = weight(_text_:policy in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08078188 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03445699 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  3. Clements, E.: ¬A conceptual framework for digital civics pedagogy informed by the philosophy of information (2020) 0.02
    0.024234561 = product of:
      0.048469122 = sum of:
        0.048469122 = product of:
          0.096938245 = sum of:
            0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096938245 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to draw on the philosophy of information, specifically the work of Luciano Floridi, to argue that digital civics must fully comprehend the implications of the digital environment, and consequently an informational ontology, to deliver to students an education that will prepare them for full participation as citizens in the infosphere. Design/methodology/approach Introducing this philosophy for use in education, the research discusses the ethical implications of ontological change in the digital age; informational organisms and their interconnectivity; and concepts of agency, both organic and artificial in digitally mediated civic interactions and civic education. Findings With the provision of a structural framework rooted in the philosophy of information, robust mechanisms for civics initiatives can be enacted. Originality/value The paper allows policy makers and practitioners to formulate healthy responses to digital age challenges in civics and civics education.
  4. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.02
    0.017228495 = product of:
      0.03445699 = sum of:
        0.03445699 = product of:
          0.06891398 = sum of:
            0.06891398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06891398 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  5. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.02
    0.017228495 = product of:
      0.03445699 = sum of:
        0.03445699 = product of:
          0.06891398 = sum of:
            0.06891398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06891398 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  6. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.01
    0.010337097 = product of:
      0.020674193 = sum of:
        0.020674193 = product of:
          0.041348387 = sum of:
            0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041348387 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
  7. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.01
    0.008614248 = product of:
      0.017228495 = sum of:
        0.017228495 = product of:
          0.03445699 = sum of:
            0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03445699 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  8. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.01
    0.006891398 = product of:
      0.013782796 = sum of:
        0.013782796 = product of:
          0.027565593 = sum of:
            0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027565593 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22