Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M."
  1. Buckland, M.: On the nature of records management theory (1995) 0.04
    0.0359253 = product of:
      0.1437012 = sum of:
        0.1437012 = weight(_text_:policy in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1437012 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5924045 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the nature of records management theory, including information retrieval, record life cycle, and information policy. Concludes that records management theory should not be seen in isolation and need not be unique to records management. Outlines functional, professional, and educational contexts of records management theory, with examples
  2. Buckland, M.: What kind of science can information science be? (2012) 0.01
    0.0094307605 = product of:
      0.037723042 = sum of:
        0.037723042 = product of:
          0.075446084 = sum of:
            0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075446084 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    During the 20th century there was a strong desire to develop an information science from librarianship, bibliography, and documentation and in 1968 the American Documentation Institute changed its name to the American Society for Information Science. By the beginning of the 21st century, however, departments of (library and) information science had turned instead towards the social sciences. These programs address a variety of important topics, but they have been less successful in providing a coherent explanation of the nature and scope of the field. Progress can be made towards a coherent, unified view of the roles of archives, libraries, museums, online information services, and related organizations if they are treated as information-providing services. However, such an approach seems significantly incomplete on ordinary understandings of the providing of information. Instead of asking what information science is or what we might wish it to become, we ask instead what kind of field it can be given our assumptions about it. We approach the question by examining some keywords: science, information, knowledge, and interdisciplinary. We conclude that if information science is concerned with what people know, then it is a form of cultural engagement, and at most, a science of the artificial.
  3. Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015) 0.01
    0.009194223 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = product of:
          0.073553786 = sum of:
            0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073553786 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 1.2016 19:22:28
  4. Shaw, R.; Buckland, M.: Open identification and linking of the four Ws (2008) 0.00
    0.0026816486 = product of:
      0.010726594 = sum of:
        0.010726594 = product of:
          0.021453189 = sum of:
            0.021453189 = weight(_text_:22 in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021453189 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas