Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Holley, R.P."
  1. Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993) 0.06 
    0.056463353 = product of:
  0.22585341 = sum of:
    0.22585341 = sum of:
      0.18294704 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18294704 = score(doc=5054,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.736004 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
      0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042906377 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
  2. Holley, R.P.: Results of a 'survey on bibliographic control and national bibliography', IFLA Section an Bibliography (1998) 0.03 
    0.03200906 = product of:
  0.12803625 = sum of:
    0.12803625 = product of:
      0.2560725 = sum of:
        0.2560725 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2560725 = score(doc=2113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            1.030191 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Holley, R.P.; Killheffer, R.E.: Is there an answer to the subject access crisis? (1981) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress subject heading policy has been frequently criticized for using obsolete and biased terminology, for not providing subject analysis in depth, and for being overly research library oriented. While both PRECIS and the Subject Analysis Project offer possible solutions, fiscal considerations make their adoptions unlikely. By using existing computer technology, individual libraries could improve subject access by improved subject searching capabilities and by implementations of subject authority files which could tailor LC subject headings to the individual libraries' needs and provide an individualized cross-reference structure. For its part, the Library of Congress should provide an uptatable machine readable file of its complete cross-reference structure. This file should contain all references used in the Library of Congress Public Catalog since much of LC's subject heading practice is based upon its cross-reference structure. With such improvements, LC subject headings could provide much better subject access at an acceptable cost
  4. Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008) 0.01 
    0.005417748 = product of:
  0.021670992 = sum of:
    0.021670992 = product of:
      0.043341983 = sum of:
        0.043341983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043341983 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:18
  5. Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002) 0.00 
    0.0038309265 = product of:
  0.015323706 = sum of:
    0.015323706 = product of:
      0.030647412 = sum of:
        0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030647412 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Themes