-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.23
0.22935373 = product of:
0.30580497 = sum of:
0.07185413 = product of:
0.21556237 = sum of:
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010)
0.03
0.031112222 = product of:
0.12444889 = sum of:
0.12444889 = weight(_text_:policy in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12444889 = score(doc=4101,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.5130373 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Hierarchical text classification (HTC) approaches have recently attracted a lot of interest on the part of researchers in human language technology and machine learning, since they have been shown to bring about equal, if not better, classification accuracy with respect to their "flat" counterparts while allowing exponential time savings at both learning and classification time. A typical component of HTC methods is a "local" policy for selecting negative examples: Given a category c, its negative training examples are by default identified with the training examples that are negative for c and positive for the categories which are siblings of c in the hierarchy. However, this policy has always been taken for granted and never been subjected to careful scrutiny since first proposed 15 years ago. This article proposes a thorough experimental comparison between this policy and three other policies for the selection of negative examples in HTC contexts, one of which (BEST LOCAL (k)) is being proposed for the first time in this article. We compare these policies on the hierarchical versions of three supervised learning algorithms (boosting, support vector machines, and naïve Bayes) by performing experiments on two standard TC datasets, REUTERS-21578 and RCV1-V2.
-
Reiner, U.: DDC-based search in the data of the German National Bibliography (2008)
0.02
0.022633824 = product of:
0.0905353 = sum of:
0.0905353 = product of:
0.1810706 = sum of:
0.1810706 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1810706 = score(doc=2166,freq=8.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.728455 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the German National Library began to classify title records of the German National Bibliography according to subject groups based on the divisions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Since 2006, all titles of the main series of the German National Bibliography are classified in strict compliance with the DDC. On this basis, an enhanced DDC-based search can be realized - e.g., searching the data of the German National Bibliography for title records using number components of synthesized classification numbers or searching for DDC numbers using unclassified title records. This paper gives an account of the current research and development of the DDC-based search. The work is conducted in the VZG project Colibri that focuses on the automatic analysis of DDC-synthesized numbers and the automatic classification of bibliographic title records.
-
Pech, G.; Delgado, C.; Sorella, S.P.: Classifying papers into subfields using Abstracts, Titles, Keywords and KeyWords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures : an application in Physics (2022)
0.02
0.01796265 = product of:
0.0718506 = sum of:
0.0718506 = weight(_text_:policy in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0718506 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Classifying papers according to the fields of knowledge is critical to clearly understand the dynamics of scientific (sub)fields, their leading questions, and trends. Most studies rely on journal categories defined by popular databases such as WoS or Scopus, but some experts find that those categories may not correctly map the existing subfields nor identify the subfield of a specific article. This study addresses the classification problem using data from each paper (Abstract, Title, Keywords, and the KeyWords Plus) and the help of experts to identify the existing subfields and journals exclusive of each subfield. These "exclusive journals" are critical to obtain, through a pattern detection procedure that uses machine learning techniques (from software NVivo), a list of the frequent terms that are specific to each subfield. With that list of terms and with the help of optimization procedures, we can identify to which subfield each paper most likely belongs. This study can contribute to support scientific policy-makers, funding, and research institutions-via more accurate academic performance evaluations-, to support editors in their tasks to redefine the scopes of journals, and to support popular databases in their processes of refining categories.
-
Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual web documents (2006)
0.01
0.0094307605 = product of:
0.037723042 = sum of:
0.037723042 = product of:
0.075446084 = sum of:
0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075446084 = score(doc=5600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To provide an integrated perspective to similarities and differences between approaches to automated classification in different research communities (machine learning, information retrieval and library science), and point to problems with the approaches and automated classification as such. Design/methodology/approach - A range of works dealing with automated classification of full-text web documents are discussed. Explorations of individual approaches are given in the following sections: special features (description, differences, evaluation), application and characteristics of web pages. Findings - Provides major similarities and differences between the three approaches: document pre-processing and utilization of web-specific document characteristics is common to all the approaches; major differences are in applied algorithms, employment or not of the vector space model and of controlled vocabularies. Problems of automated classification are recognized. Research limitations/implications - The paper does not attempt to provide an exhaustive bibliography of related resources. Practical implications - As an integrated overview of approaches from different research communities with application examples, it is very useful for students in library and information science and computer science, as well as for practitioners. Researchers from one community have the information on how similar tasks are conducted in different communities. Originality/value - To the author's knowledge, no review paper on automated text classification attempted to discuss more than one community's approach from an integrated perspective.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.; Cai, X.: Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization (2017)
0.01
0.0094307605 = product of:
0.037723042 = sum of:
0.037723042 = product of:
0.075446084 = sum of:
0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075446084 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A very important extension of the traditional domain of knowledge organization (KO) arises from attempts to incorporate techniques devised in the computer science domain for automatic concept extraction and for grouping, categorizing, clustering and otherwise organizing knowledge using mechanical means. Four specific terms have emerged to identify the most prevalent techniques: machine learning, clustering, automatic indexing, and automatic classification. Our study presents three domain analytical case analyses in search of answers. The first case relies on citations located using the ISKO-supported "Knowledge Organization Bibliography." The second case relies on works in both Web of Science and SCOPUS. Case three applies co-word analysis and citation analysis to the contents of the papers in the present special issue. We observe scholars involved in "clustering" and "automatic classification" who share common thematic emphases. But we have found no coherence, no common activity and no social semantics. We have not found a research front, or a common teleology within the KO domain. We also have found a lively group of authors who have succeeded in submitting papers to this special issue, and their work quite interestingly aligns with the case studies we report. There is an emphasis on KO for information retrieval; there is much work on clustering (which involves conceptual points within texts) and automatic classification (which involves semantic groupings at the meta-document level).
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.01
0.009194223 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = product of:
0.073553786 = sum of:
0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073553786 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.007661853 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = product of:
0.061294824 = sum of:
0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061294824 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016)
0.01
0.007661853 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = product of:
0.061294824 = sum of:
0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061294824 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 9:22:09
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:24:52
-
Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007)
0.01
0.005363297 = product of:
0.021453189 = sum of:
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 18:31:54
-
Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009)
0.00
0.0045971116 = product of:
0.018388446 = sum of:
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:11:54
-
Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009)
0.00
0.0045971116 = product of:
0.018388446 = sum of:
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 19:51:28
-
Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013)
0.00
0.0045971116 = product of:
0.018388446 = sum of:
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 13:22:36
-
Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015)
0.00
0.0045971116 = product of:
0.018388446 = sum of:
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4. 8.2015 19:22:04
-
Mengle, S.; Goharian, N.: Passage detection using text classification (2009)
0.00
0.0038309265 = product of:
0.015323706 = sum of:
0.015323706 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030647412 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:14:43
