Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  2. Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991) 0.04 
    0.043829456 = product of:
  0.08765891 = sum of:
    0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057480477 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
    0.030178435 = product of:
      0.06035687 = sum of:
        0.06035687 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06035687 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.24281834 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: TEMPLETON, R.: The Library Association's role in developing standards; HARRISON, H.P.: Special materials and problems: standards for audiovisual materials; ANDERSON, D.: Selections of bibliographic standards and the processes of standardization; GILCHRIST, A.: The standards jungle; BOURNE, R.: The IFLA UBCIM programme: standards in the changing world; ROBERTS, W.: The role of IFLA in framing and promoting bibliographic standards; HILL, M.W.: Standards for information handling: needs and dilemmas; JUSU-SHERIFF, G.: Standardization: an African viewpoint; BISWAS, S.C.: Standardization of bibliographic control in South Asia; CROUCHER, M.: The British National Bibliography: an historical perspective; BUCKLEY, B.J.: CD-ROM at the British Library; HOPKINSON, A.: Information transfer and exchange formats; HESELTINE, R.G.: Library automation in the 1990s: the open systems future; GRAVES, S.E.: Problems of serials control; ODDY, P.: Authority control in the local, national and international environment; MITCHELL, J.: Library co-operatives: bibliographic databases; BROWN, S.: Angl-American cataloguing rules; MORELELI-CACOURIS, M. u. M. SKEPASTIANU: Cataloguing practices in Greece; MUN, K.S.: Bibliographic description and information exchange in Southeast Asia: a survey; CURWEN, A.G.: International standard bibliographic description; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH; AITCHISON, J.: Subject control: thesaurus construction standards; SWEENEY, R.: Dewey Decimal Classification: an international standard; McILWAINE, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control; BUXTON, A.B.: UDC in online systems; BUXTON, A.B.: International gateways; BUXTON, A.B.: Common command languages
  3. Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993) 0.02 
    0.021339376 = product of:
  0.0853575 = sum of:
    0.0853575 = product of:
      0.170715 = sum of:
        0.170715 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.170715 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.686794 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Report commissioned by Book Industry Communications (BIC) and funded by the British National Bibliography Research Fund and the Britsh National Bibliographic Service. The aims of the project were: to review the provisions for bibliographic data within EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport); to compare those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and the book publishing industry, and to examine the implications for MARC based databases, such as UKMARC
    Series
    British National Bibliography Research Fund report; 62
  4. Leeves, J.: Harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange (1993) 0.02 
    0.018861521 = product of:
  0.075446084 = sum of:
    0.075446084 = product of:
      0.15089217 = sum of:
        0.15089217 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15089217 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.6070458 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    British National Bibliography research fund report; 62
  5. Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993) 0.02 
    0.01600453 = product of:
  0.06401812 = sum of:
    0.06401812 = product of:
      0.12803625 = sum of:
        0.12803625 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12803625 = score(doc=2327,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5150955 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
  6. Kokabi, M.: ¬The Iranian adaptation of UNIMARC (1997) 0.02 
    0.015089218 = product of:
  0.06035687 = sum of:
    0.06035687 = product of:
      0.12071374 = sum of:
        0.12071374 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12071374 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.48563668 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Outline of a thesis produced at the University of New South Wales School of Information, Library and Archive Studies, the first serious study of MARC for Iran despite 12 years of the presence of computers in Iranian libraries. Considers the various MARC formats, reasons for choosing UNIMARC, and the use of the Farsi language in machines. Lists the modifications required to UNIMARC for use in the Iranian National Bibliography
  7. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.01 
    0.013203065 = product of:
  0.05281226 = sum of:
    0.05281226 = product of:
      0.10562452 = sum of:
        0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10562452 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
  8. Conklin, C.E.: Australia: The ABN, ANB, AUSMARC and the National Library (1988) 0.01 
    0.013203065 = product of:
  0.05281226 = sum of:
    0.05281226 = product of:
      0.10562452 = sum of:
        0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10562452 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Australian libraries have kept up with the latest technology and innovation in cataloging. The Australian Bibliographic Network is a shared cataloging-based national bibliographic utility. This essay delves into the relationships of the ABN, the Australian National Bibliography, AUSMARC, and the role of the Australian National Library in the creation of these elements of computerized cataloging in that country. It also discusses some of the policies and procedures utilized by Australian libraries in their automated cataloging environment, as well as looking at some of the environmental attitudes arising from the change to automated cataloging. Finally, the essay concludes with an outline of some of the similarities and differences between the AUSMARC and USMARC formats.
  9. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.013002597 = product of:
  0.052010387 = sum of:
    0.052010387 = product of:
      0.104020774 = sum of:
        0.104020774 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104020774 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.012258965 = product of:
  0.04903586 = sum of:
    0.04903586 = product of:
      0.09807172 = sum of:
        0.09807172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09807172 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  13. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  15. Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013) 0.01 
    0.0094307605 = product of:
  0.037723042 = sum of:
    0.037723042 = product of:
      0.075446084 = sum of:
        0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075446084 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Bibliographic records should now be used in innovative end-user applications that enable users to learn about, discover and exploit available content, and this information should be interpreted and reused also beyond the library domain. New conceptual models such as FRBR offer the foundation for such developments. The main motivation for this research is to contribute to the adoption of the FRBR model in future bibliographic standards and systems, by analysing limitations in existing bibliographic information and looking for short- and long-term solutions that can improve the data quality in terms of expressing the FRBR model. Design/methodology/approach - MARC records in three collections (BIBSYS catalogue, Slovenian National Bibliography and BTJ catalogue) were first analysed by looking at statistics of field and subfield usage to determine common patterns that express FRBR. Based on this, different rules for interpreting the information were developed. Finally typical problems/errors found in MARC records were analysed. Findings - Different types of FRBR entity-relationship structures that typically can be found in bibliographic records are identified. Problems related to interpreting these from bibliographic records are analyzed. Frbrisation of consistent and complete MARC records is relatively successful, particularly if all entities are systematically described and relationships among them are clearly indicated. Research limitations/implications - Advanced matching was not used for clustering of identical entities. Practical implications - Cataloguing guidelines are proposed to enable better frbrisation of MARC records in the interim period, before new formats are developed and implemented. Originality/value - This is the first in depth analysis of manifestations embodying several expressions and of works and agents as subjects.
  16. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01 
    0.009194223 = product of:
  0.036776893 = sum of:
    0.036776893 = product of:
      0.073553786 = sum of:
        0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073553786 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  17. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.008668398 = product of:
  0.03467359 = sum of:
    0.03467359 = product of:
      0.06934718 = sum of:
        0.06934718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06934718 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  18. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.008668398 = product of:
  0.03467359 = sum of:
    0.03467359 = product of:
      0.06934718 = sum of:
        0.06934718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06934718 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  19. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01 
    0.007661853 = product of:
  0.030647412 = sum of:
    0.030647412 = product of:
      0.061294824 = sum of:
        0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061294824 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  20. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01 
    0.007661853 = product of:
  0.030647412 = sum of:
    0.030647412 = product of:
      0.061294824 = sum of:
        0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061294824 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 12
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • s 6
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications