Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.07
    0.06973944 = product of:
      0.13947888 = sum of:
        0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11496095 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.02451793 = product of:
          0.04903586 = sum of:
            0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04903586 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  2. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.06
    0.06102201 = product of:
      0.12204402 = sum of:
        0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10059083 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.021453189 = product of:
          0.042906377 = sum of:
            0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906377 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  3. Kilner, K.: ¬The AustLit Gateway and scholarly bibliography : a specialist implementation of the FRBR (2004) 0.02
    0.019601468 = product of:
      0.07840587 = sum of:
        0.07840587 = product of:
          0.15681174 = sum of:
            0.15681174 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15681174 = score(doc=5851,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.63086057 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses how the AustLit: Australian Literature Gateway's interpretation, enhancement and implementation of the International Federation of Library Association's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR Final Report 1998) model is meeting the needs of Australian literature scholars for accurate bibliographic representation of the histories of literary texts. It also explores how the AustLit Gateway's underpinning research principles, which are based on the tradition of scholarly enumerative and descriptive bibliography, with enhancements from analytical bibliography and literary biography, have impacted upon our implementation of the FRBR model. The major enhancement or alteration to the model is the use of enhanced manifestations, which allow the full representation of all agents' contributions to be shown in a highly granular format by enabling creation events to be incorporated at all levels of the Work, Expression and Manifestation nexus.
  4. Castelli, D.: Digital libraries of the future - and the role of libraries (2006) 0.02
    0.01796265 = product of:
      0.0718506 = sum of:
        0.0718506 = weight(_text_:policy in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0718506 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to introduce the digital libraries of the future, their enabling technologies and their organisational models. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first discusses the requirements for the digital libraries of the future, then presents the DILIGENT infrastructure as a technological response to these requirements and, finally, it discusses the role that libraries can play in the organisational framework envisioned by DILIGENT. Findings - Digital libraries of the future will give access to a large variety of multimedia and multi-type documents created by integrating content from many different heterogeneous sources that range from repositories of text, images, and audio-video, to scientific data archives, and databases. The digital library will provide a seamless environment where the co-operative access, filtering, manipulation, generation, and preservation of these documents will be supported as a continuous cycle. Users of the library will be both consumers and producers of information, either by themselves or in collaborations with other users. Policy ensuring mechanisms will guarantee that the information produced is visible only to those who have the appropriate rights to access it. The realisation of these new digital libraries requires both the provision of a new technology and a change in the role played by the libraries in the information access-production cycle. Practical implications - Digital libraries of the future will be core instruments for serving a large class of applications, especially in the research field. Originality/value - The paper briefly introduces one of the most innovative technologies for digital libraries, and it discusses how it contributes to the realisation of a novel digital libraries scenario.
  5. Banwell, L.: Developing and evaluation framework for a supranational digital library (2003) 0.01
    0.014370119 = product of:
      0.057480477 = sum of:
        0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057480477 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will explore the issues surrounding the development of an evaluation framework for a supranational digital library system, as seen through the TEL (The European Library) project. It will describe work an the project to date, and seek to establish what are the key drivers, priorities and barriers encountered, in developing such a framework. TEL is being funded by the EU as an Accompanying Measure in the IST program. Its main focus of is an consensus building, and also includes preparatory technical work to develop testbeds, which will gauge to what extent interoperability is achievable. In order for TEL to take its place as a major Information Society initiative of the EU, it needs to be closely attuned to the needs, expectations and realities of its user communities, which comprise the citizens of the project's national partners. To this end the evaluation framework described in this paper, is being developed by establishing the users' viewpoints and priorities in relation to the key project themes. A summary of the issues to be used in the baseline, and to be expanded upon in the paper, follows: - Establishing the differing contexts of the national library partners, and the differing national priorities which will impact an TEL - Exploring the differing expectations relating to building and using the hybrid library - Exploring the differing expectations relating to TEL. TEL needs to add value - what does this mean in each partner state, and for the individuals within them? 1. Introduction to TEL TEL (The European Library) is a thirty month project, funded by the European Commission as part of its Fifth Framework Programme for research. It aims to set up a co-operative framework for access to the major national, mainly digital, collections in European national libraries. TEL is funded as an Accompanying Measure, designed to support the work of the IST (Information Society Technologies) Programme an the development of access to cultural and scientific knowledge. TEL will stop short of becoming a live service during the lifetime of the project, and is focused an ensuring co-operative and concerted approaches to technical and business issues associated with large-scale content development. It will lay the policy and technical groundwork towards a pan European digital library based an distributed digital collections, and providing seamless access to the digital resources of major European national libraries. It began in February, 2001, and has eight national library partners: Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. It is also seeking to encourage the participation of all European national libraries in due course.
  6. Digital libraries : policy, planning and practice (2004) 0.01
    0.014370119 = product of:
      0.057480477 = sum of:
        0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057480477 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Niggemann, E.: Europeana: connecting cultural heritage (2009) 0.01
    0.014370119 = product of:
      0.057480477 = sum of:
        0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 2816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057480477 = score(doc=2816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 2816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2816)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The European Commission's goal for Europeana is to make European information resources easier to use in an online environment. It will build on Europe's rich heritage, combining multicultural and multilingual environments with technological advances and new business models. The Europeana prototype is the result of a 2-year project that began in July 2007. Europeana.eu went live on 20 November 2008, launched by Viviane Reding, European Commissioner for Information Society and Media. Europeana.eu is about ideas and inspiration. It links the user to 2 million digital items: images, text, sounds and videos. Europeana is a Thematic Network funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, as part of the i2010 policy. Originally known as the European digital library network - EDLnet - it is a partnership of 100 representatives of heritage and knowledge organisations and IT experts from throughout Europe. They contribute to the work packages that are solving the technical and usability issues. The project is run by a core team based in the national library of the Netherlands, the Koninklijke Bibliotheek. It builds on the project management and technical expertise developed by The European Library, which is a service of the Conference of European National Librarians. Content is added via so called aggregators, national or domain specific portals aggegrating digital content and channelling it to Europeana. Most of these portals are being developed in the framework of EU funded projects, e.g. European Film Gateway, Athena and EuropeanaLocal. Overseeing the project is the EDL Foundation, which includes key European cultural heritage associations from the four domains. The Foundation's statutes commit members to: * providing access to Europe's cultural and scientific heritage through a cross-domain portal; * co-operating in the delivery and sustainability of the joint portal; * stimulating initiatives to bring together existing digital content; * supporting digitisation of Europe's cultural and scientific heritage. Europeana.eu is a prototype. Europeana Version 1.0 is being developed and will be launched in 2010 with links to over 6 million digital objects.
  8. Borgman, C.L.: Multi-media, multi-cultural, and multi-lingual digital libraries : or how do we exchange data In 400 languages? (1997) 0.01
    0.012573854 = product of:
      0.050295416 = sum of:
        0.050295416 = weight(_text_:policy in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050295416 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.20734155 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet would not be very useful if communication were limited to textual exchanges between speakers of English located in the United States. Rather, its value lies in its ability to enable people from multiple nations, speaking multiple languages, to employ multiple media in interacting with each other. While computer networks broke through national boundaries long ago, they remain much more effective for textual communication than for exchanges of sound, images, or mixed media -- and more effective for communication in English than for exchanges in most other languages, much less interactions involving multiple languages. Supporting searching and display in multiple languages is an increasingly important issue for all digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Even if a digital library contains materials in only one language, the content needs to be searchable and displayable on computers in countries speaking other languages. We need to exchange data between digital libraries, whether in a single language or in multiple languages. Data exchanges may be large batch updates or interactive hyperlinks. In any of these cases, character sets must be represented in a consistent manner if exchanges are to succeed. Issues of interoperability, portability, and data exchange related to multi-lingual character sets have received surprisingly little attention in the digital library community or in discussions of standards for information infrastructure, except in Europe. The landmark collection of papers on Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, for example, contains no discussion of multi-lingual issues except for a passing reference to the Unicode standard. The goal of this short essay is to draw attention to the multi-lingual issues involved in designing digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Many of the multi-lingual design issues parallel those of multi-media digital libraries, a topic more familiar to most readers of D-Lib Magazine. This essay draws examples from multi-media DLs to illustrate some of the urgent design challenges in creating a globally distributed network serving people who speak many languages other than English. First we introduce some general issues of medium, culture, and language, then discuss the design challenges in the transition from local to global systems, lastly addressing technical matters. The technical issues involve the choice of character sets to represent languages, similar to the choices made in representing images or sound. However, the scale of the language problem is far greater. Standards for multi-media representation are being adopted fairly rapidly, in parallel with the availability of multi-media content in electronic form. By contrast, we have hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of years worth of textual materials in hundreds of languages, created long before data encoding standards existed. Textual content from past and present is being encoded in language and application-specific representations that are difficult to exchange without losing data -- if they exchange at all. We illustrate the multi-language DL challenge with examples drawn from the research library community, which typically handles collections of materials in 400 or so languages. These are problems faced not only by developers of digital libraries, but by those who develop and manage any communication technology that crosses national or linguistic boundaries.
  9. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.01
    0.010835496 = product of:
      0.043341983 = sum of:
        0.043341983 = product of:
          0.086683966 = sum of:
            0.086683966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086683966 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  10. Subject gateways (2000) 0.01
    0.010726594 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = product of:
          0.085812755 = sum of:
            0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085812755 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  11. Informatikportals io-port.net mit semantischen Technologien (2005) 0.01
    0.0094307605 = product of:
      0.037723042 = sum of:
        0.037723042 = product of:
          0.075446084 = sum of:
            0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075446084 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    "Die automatische Organisation von Informationsbeständen in Portalen ist für Forschung und Entwicklung noch immer eine große Herausforderung. Riesige Daten- und Informationsmengen müssen aus heterogenen Quellen zusammengeführt, unterschiedliche Benutzergruppen nach individuellen Bedürfnissen bedient werden. Zur Lösung dieser Aufgaben setzt die Forschung hier auf semantische Technologien und maschinelles Lernen sowie auf das Knowhow von Expertinnen und Experten aus der Fachinformationsbranche. In den Projekten "Fachinformationssystem Informatik" (FIS-I) und "Semantische Methoden und Werkzeuge für Informationsportale" (SemIPort) entwickelten Informatikwissenschaftler und Informationsspezialisten gemeinsam Methoden und Werkzeuge für effizientere Informationsportale. In FIS-I wird das Informatikportal io-port.net mit seinen Informationsbeständen aufgebaut. SemIPort begleitet diese Arbeit mit neuen semantischen Methoden und Werkzeugen. Beide Vorhaben werden vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) gefördert. FIS-I ist eine Kooperation der Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI e.V.) und von FIZ Karlsruhe sowie den Universitäten Karlsruhe, Trier und TU München. In SemIPort arbeiten die Universitäten Karlsruhe und Trier, das Deutsche Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) und das Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme (IPSI) zusammen. Der Testbetrieb des Informatikportals ioport.net begann bereits im Juli 2004. Die Basis des Portals bilden die wichtigen Datensammlungen CompuScience aus dem FIZ Karlsruhe, DBLP (Digital Bibliography & Library Project) von der Universität Trier, LEABiB (Lehrstuhl für Effiziente Algorithmen - Bibliographische Datenbank) von der TU München und CCSB (The Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies) von der Universität Karlsruhe. Die nach einer Suche angezeigten Ergebnisse (Treffer) werden vielfältig miteinander verknüpft und ermöglichen somit eine weitere Navigation im Datenbestand: Vom Autor einer Publikation gelangt man per Mausklick auf dessen individuelle Publikationsliste, von einem Zeitschriftentitel zum Inhaltsverzeichnis oder zum Jahresregister der Zeitschrift. Der direkte Zugriff auf die elektronischen Volltexte der LNI-Reihe (Lecture Notes of Informatics) der GI wird exklusiv über io-port.net angeboten."
  12. Silva, A.J.C.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Laender, A.H.F.; Modesto, M.A.B.; Cristo, M.; Ziviani, N.: Finding what is missing from a digital library : a case study in the computer science field (2009) 0.01
    0.0094307605 = product of:
      0.037723042 = sum of:
        0.037723042 = product of:
          0.075446084 = sum of:
            0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075446084 = score(doc=4219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a process to retrieve the URL of a document for which metadata records exist in a digital library catalog but a pointer to the full text of the document is not available. The process uses results from queries submitted to Web search engines for finding the URL of the corresponding full text or any related material. We present a comprehensive study of this process in different situations by investigating different query strategies applied to three general purpose search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN) and two specialized ones (Scholar and CiteSeer), considering five user scenarios. Specifically, we have conducted experiments with metadata records taken from the Brazilian Digital Library of Computing (BDBComp) and The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography (DBLP). We found that Scholar was the most effective search engine for this task in all considered scenarios and that simple strategies for combining and re-ranking results from Scholar and Google significantly improve the retrieval quality. Moreover, we study the influence of the number of query results on the effectiveness of finding missing information as well as the coverage of the proposed scenarios.
  13. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.01
    0.009194223 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = product of:
          0.073553786 = sum of:
            0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073553786 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  14. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01
    0.009194223 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = product of:
          0.073553786 = sum of:
            0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073553786 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  15. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.01
    0.007661853 = product of:
      0.030647412 = sum of:
        0.030647412 = product of:
          0.061294824 = sum of:
            0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061294824 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  16. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.0061294823 = product of:
      0.02451793 = sum of:
        0.02451793 = product of:
          0.04903586 = sum of:
            0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04903586 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  17. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.01
    0.0061294823 = product of:
      0.02451793 = sum of:
        0.02451793 = product of:
          0.04903586 = sum of:
            0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04903586 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  18. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01
    0.0061294823 = product of:
      0.02451793 = sum of:
        0.02451793 = product of:
          0.04903586 = sum of:
            0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04903586 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  19. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01
    0.005417748 = product of:
      0.021670992 = sum of:
        0.021670992 = product of:
          0.043341983 = sum of:
            0.043341983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043341983 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
  20. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.01
    0.005363297 = product of:
      0.021453189 = sum of:
        0.021453189 = product of:
          0.042906377 = sum of:
            0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906377 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00