-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.06
0.0584679 = product of:
0.1169358 = sum of:
0.10161209 = weight(_text_:policy in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10161209 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.015323706 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030647412 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Pohl, A.: OCLC, WorldCat und die Metadaten-Kontroverse (2009)
0.04
0.040644836 = product of:
0.16257934 = sum of:
0.16257934 = weight(_text_:policy in 2780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16257934 = score(doc=2780,freq=16.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 2780, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2780)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Mit der Ankündigung einer "Policy for Use and Transfer of WorldCat Records" hat OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) in der angelsächsischen Bibliothekswelt eine lebhafte Diskussion hervorgerufen. Im deutschsprachigen Raum hat die geplante Policy allerdings bisher sehr wenig Resonanz gefunden. Ein Grund mag darin liegen, dass OCLC in Europa (noch) deutlich weniger Gewicht hat als in den USA. Sicher hätte das Inkrafttreten einer OCLC-Metadaten-Policy (ganz gleich, wie sie ausgestaltet sein mag) weitreichende Auswirkungen auf das weltweite Bibliothekswesen. Eine Beschäftigung mit dem Thema ist also mehr als angebracht. Dieser Artikel dient dem Zweck, den Stand der Diskussion im angelsächsischen Raum wiederzugeben und einen Einblick in die verschiedenen Aspekte der Auseinandersetzung zu geben.
- Content
- "Hintergründe Das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) mit Sitz in Dublin (Ohio) präsentiert sich als eine Non-Profit-Mitgliederorganisation, "die sich im öffentlichen Interesse für den breiteren, computergestützten Zugang zum weltweiten Wissen und die Senkung der damit verbundenen Kosten einsetzt." Im globalen Maßstab ist OCLC die größte Organisation im Bibliothekswesen, mit knapp 70.000 Mitgliedsbibliotheken in über 100 Ländern . Das Fundament von OCLC bildet der WorldCat, dessen Konzept dem eines Verbundkatalogs entspricht: eine bibliografische Online-Datenbank für die gemeinsame Katalogisierung, in der auch die Bestandsdaten der beteiligten Bibliotheken erfasst sind. Auf dieser Datenbank baut eine große Zahl der OCLC-Dienstleistungen auf, seien dies Katalogisierungs- und Metadatendienste, Recherchewerkzeuge für Endnutzer, Fernleihdienste oder Bestandsanalyse- und -managementwerkzeuge. Für die Teilnahme am WorldCat sowie die Fremddatenübernahme aus dem WorldCat berechnet OCLC den Mitgliedsinstitutionen nicht unbeträchtliche Summen. Die Einnahmen aus WorldCat-Gebühren und Fremddatendiensten machen mehr als ein Drittel der Gesamteinnahmen OCLCs aus: Im Steuerjahr 2007/2008 betrugen die Einnahmen OCLCs aus Metadatendiensten nach Unternehmensangaben 85,8 Millionen US-$. Das sind knapp 35% der Gesamteinnahmen von 246,4 Millionen US-$ im selben Jahr.6 Man kann OCLC also ein großes finanzielles Interesse daran unterstellen, diesen Datenpool weiterhin unter eigener Kontrolle zu halten, damit die gewohnten Gewinnströme nicht versiegen. Vor diesem Hintergrund nimmt es nicht wunder, dass OCLC versucht eine Policy einzuführen, welche die Geldströme auch in Zukunft sichern soll. Mit der Ankündigung dieser rechtsverbindlichen Regelung hat OCLC Anfang November 2008 die Gemüter kritischer Bibliothekare und von Open-Data-Verfechtern erhitzt. Viele Passagen der Policy erwecken den Eindruck, dass sich OCLC ein Monopol auf die WorldCat-Daten sichern will und Konkurrenz auszuschalten versucht. Die Reaktionen - besonders in der US-amerikanischen Blogosphäre - waren harsch, wodurch bereits einige Änderungen der Policy erreicht worden sind. Mitte Januar hat OCLC nun als Erwiderung auf die vehemente Kritik den geplanten Termin des Inkrafttretens der Policy nach hinten verlegt: von Mitte Februar auf das Dritte Quartal 2009. Mit dem Review "Board of Shared Data Creation and Stewardship" hat OCLC zudem ein Gremium einberufen, das indessen mit OCLC-Mitgliedern und anderen Beteiligten in Kontakt treten soll, um den Policy-Entwurf zu überarbeiten."
-
Lubetzky, S.: Cataloging rules and principles : a critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision (1953)
0.03
0.028740238 = product of:
0.11496095 = sum of:
0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11496095 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Issue
- Prepared for the Board on Cataloging Policy and Research of the A.L.A. Division of Cataloging and Classification.
-
Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978)
0.03
0.025147708 = product of:
0.10059083 = sum of:
0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10059083 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
-
Häusner, E.-M.; Sommerland, Y.: Assessment of metadata quality of the Swedish National Bibliography through mapping user awareness (2018)
0.02
0.018671954 = product of:
0.074687816 = sum of:
0.074687816 = product of:
0.14937563 = sum of:
0.14937563 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14937563 = score(doc=5169,freq=4.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.60094476 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article is examining if the metadata quality of the Swedish National Bibliography could be measured through mapping the level of user awareness regarding the characteristics of the data. A qualitative meta-synthesis was carried out and results from two previous studies conducted at the National Library of Sweden were interpreted and conceptualized through an integrated analyze. The results of the meta-synthesis showed a need for an action plan for increasing user awareness to efficiently reach target groups of national bibliographic data at its fullest potential, i.e. user awareness on the usability and the quality of the metadata.
-
Joseph, K.: Wikipedia knows the value of what the library catalog forgets (2019)
0.01
0.013203065 = product of:
0.05281226 = sum of:
0.05281226 = product of:
0.10562452 = sum of:
0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10562452 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Shifting library catalogs from physical to digital has come at a cost. Catalog records no longer leave traces of their own evolution, which is a loss for librarianship. The subjective nature of information classification warrants self-examination, within which we may see the evolution of practice, debates over attribution and relevance, and how culture is reflected in the systems used to describe it. Wikipedia models what is possible: revision histories and discussion pages function as knowledge generators. A list of unanswerable questions for the modern catalog urges us to construct a new, forward-thinking bibliography that allows us to look backward.
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.012573854 = product of:
0.050295416 = sum of:
0.050295416 = weight(_text_:policy in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050295416 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.20734155 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.01
0.012258965 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = product of:
0.09807172 = sum of:
0.09807172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09807172 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.01
0.012258965 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = product of:
0.09807172 = sum of:
0.09807172 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09807172 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Vorndran, A.: Hervorholen, was in unseren Daten steckt! : Mehrwerte durch Analysen großer Bibliotheksdatenbestände (2018)
0.01
0.0094307605 = product of:
0.037723042 = sum of:
0.037723042 = product of:
0.075446084 = sum of:
0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075446084 = score(doc=4601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 4601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) verfolgt das Ziel, den unter Culturegraph.org verfügbaren großen Datenbestand von mehr als 160 Millionen Titeldaten deutschsprachiger Bibliotheksverbünde sowie der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und der British National Bibliography über Analysen, Verknüpfungen und Auswertungen in größerem Umfang nutzbar zu machen. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick, welche Themenstellungen und Methoden bislang im Zentrum stehen. Dies ist einerseits die Bündelung von Werken, die erlaubt, mehrere Ausgaben, Auflagen oder Übersetzungen eines Werks zusammenzuführen. Inhaltserschließende Informationen wie Klassifikation oder verbale Erschließung, ebenso wie Normdatenverknüpfungen, können so auf alle Mitglieder eines Bündels übertragen werden, so dass ein Gewinn an Standardisierung und Erschließungstiefe zu erreichen ist. Andererseits können über bibliothekarische Daten hinaus auch externe Datenquellen zur Anreicherung herangezogen werden. Dies wird anhand eines Abgleichs von Personen in der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und der Datenbank Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) dargestellt. Unter Verwendung der Culturegraph-Titeldaten werden Personen mittels der von ihnen verfassten Publikationen abgeglichen und zusammengeführt. Abschließend werden einige statistische Auswertungen des Datenbestandes vorgestellt.
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.01
0.009194223 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = product of:
0.073553786 = sum of:
0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073553786 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.01
0.009194223 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = product of:
0.073553786 = sum of:
0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073553786 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.009194223 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = product of:
0.073553786 = sum of:
0.073553786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073553786 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.01
0.007661853 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = product of:
0.061294824 = sum of:
0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061294824 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.01
0.007661853 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = product of:
0.061294824 = sum of:
0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061294824 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.01
0.007661853 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = product of:
0.061294824 = sum of:
0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061294824 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.0065012984 = product of:
0.026005194 = sum of:
0.026005194 = product of:
0.052010387 = sum of:
0.052010387 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052010387 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.01
0.0061294823 = product of:
0.02451793 = sum of:
0.02451793 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04903586 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.0061294823 = product of:
0.02451793 = sum of:
0.02451793 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04903586 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.0061294823 = product of:
0.02451793 = sum of:
0.02451793 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04903586 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
