Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997) 0.03
    0.025147708 = product of:
      0.10059083 = sum of:
        0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10059083 = score(doc=85,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original research and review articles and, in the past 10 years, several major medical periodicals have adopted the policy of including such abstracts with all their articles. A review of the literature reveals that proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some periodicals have not adopted structured abstracts and their opponents claim that they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Concludes that previous research on structured abstracts focused on how closely they followed prescribed structure and include salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article
  2. Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing and abstracting 1977-1981 : an international bibliography (1984) 0.02
    0.022633824 = product of:
      0.0905353 = sum of:
        0.0905353 = product of:
          0.1810706 = sum of:
            0.1810706 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1810706 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.728455 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007) 0.01
    0.013203065 = product of:
      0.05281226 = sum of:
        0.05281226 = product of:
          0.10562452 = sum of:
            0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10562452 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Public library catalogues in early twentieth-century Britain frequently included annotations, either to clarify obscure titles or to provide further information about the subject-matter of the books they described. Two manuals giving instruction on how to do this were published at that time. Following World War I, with the decline of the printed catalogue, this kind of annotation became rarer, and was almost confined to bulletins of new books. The early issues of the British National Bibliography included some annotations in exceptional cases. Parallels are drawn with the provision of table-of-contents information in present-day OPAC's.
  4. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.007661853 = product of:
      0.030647412 = sum of:
        0.030647412 = product of:
          0.061294824 = sum of:
            0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061294824 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  5. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.0061294823 = product of:
      0.02451793 = sum of:
        0.02451793 = product of:
          0.04903586 = sum of:
            0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04903586 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  6. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0045971116 = product of:
      0.018388446 = sum of:
        0.018388446 = product of:
          0.036776893 = sum of:
            0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036776893 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  7. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0045971116 = product of:
      0.018388446 = sum of:
        0.018388446 = product of:
          0.036776893 = sum of:
            0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036776893 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  8. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0045971116 = product of:
      0.018388446 = sum of:
        0.018388446 = product of:
          0.036776893 = sum of:
            0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036776893 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  9. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0038309265 = product of:
      0.015323706 = sum of:
        0.015323706 = product of:
          0.030647412 = sum of:
            0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030647412 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04524064 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356