Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.03 
    0.02640613 = product of:
  0.10562452 = sum of:
    0.10562452 = product of:
      0.21124904 = sum of:
        0.21124904 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21124904 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.8498642 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Peritz, B.C.: On the informativeness of titles (1984) 0.03 
    0.025147708 = product of:
  0.10059083 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The frequency of non-informative titles of journal articles was assessed for two fields: library and information science and sociology. The percentage of non informative titles was 21% in the formaer and 15% in the latter. In both fields, the non-informative titles, were concentratein only a few journals. The non-informative titles in library science were derived mainly from non-research journals. IN sociology the reasons for non-informative titles may be more complex; some of these journals are highly cited. For the improvement of retrievaleffiency the adoption of a policy encouraging informative titles (as in journals of chemistry) is recommended.
  3. Ribeiro, F.: Subject indexing and authority control in archives : the need for subject indexing in archives and for an indexing policy using controlled language (1996) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 6577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=6577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 6577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6577)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Cavanagh, A.K.: ¬A comparison of the retrieval performance of multi-disciplinary table-of-contents databases with conventional specialised databases (1997) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In an endeavour to compare retrieval performance and periodical overlap in a biological field, the same topic was searched on 5 Table of Contents (ToC) databases and 3 specialised biological databases. Performance was assessed in terms of precision and recall. The ToC databases in general had higher precision in that most material found was relevant. They were less satisfactory in recall where some located fewer than 50% of identified high relevance articles. Subject specific databases had overall better recall but lower precision with many more false drops and items of low relevance occuring. These differences were associated with variations in indexing practice and policy and searching capabilities of the various databases. In a further comparison, it was found that the electronic databases, as a group, identified only 75% of the articles known from independent source to have been published in the field
  5. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  6. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  7. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  8. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.01 
    0.010726594 = product of:
  0.042906377 = sum of:
    0.042906377 = product of:
      0.085812755 = sum of:
        0.085812755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085812755 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  9. Kelly, D.; Sugimoto, C.R.: ¬A systematic review of interactive information retrieval evaluation studies, 1967-2006 (2013) 0.01 
    0.0094307605 = product of:
  0.037723042 = sum of:
    0.037723042 = product of:
      0.075446084 = sum of:
        0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075446084 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    With the increasing number and diversity of search tools available, interest in the evaluation of search systems, particularly from a user perspective, has grown among researchers. More researchers are designing and evaluating interactive information retrieval (IIR) systems and beginning to innovate in evaluation methods. Maturation of a research specialty relies on the ability to replicate research, provide standards for measurement and analysis, and understand past endeavors. This article presents a historical overview of 40 years of IIR evaluation studies using the method of systematic review. A total of 2,791 journal and conference units were manually examined and 127 articles were selected for analysis in this study, based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These articles were systematically coded using features such as author, publication date, sources and references, and properties of the research method used in the articles, such as number of subjects, tasks, corpora, and measures. Results include data describing the growth of IIR studies over time, the most frequently occurring and cited authors and sources, and the most common types of corpora and measures used. An additional product of this research is a bibliography of IIR evaluation research that can be used by students, teachers, and those new to the area. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first historical, systematic characterization of the IIR evaluation literature, including the documentation of methods and measures used by researchers in this specialty.
  10. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01 
    0.007661853 = product of:
  0.030647412 = sum of:
    0.030647412 = product of:
      0.061294824 = sum of:
        0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061294824 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  11. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01 
    0.007661853 = product of:
  0.030647412 = sum of:
    0.030647412 = product of:
      0.061294824 = sum of:
        0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061294824 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  12. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.007661853 = product of:
  0.030647412 = sum of:
    0.030647412 = product of:
      0.061294824 = sum of:
        0.061294824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061294824 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  13. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  14. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  15. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  17. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  18. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  19. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  20. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061294823 = product of:
  0.02451793 = sum of:
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 3
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • s 3
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes