-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.28
0.2802279 = product of:
0.3736372 = sum of:
0.07185413 = product of:
0.21556237 = sum of:
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08622071 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.23
0.22935373 = product of:
0.30580497 = sum of:
0.07185413 = product of:
0.21556237 = sum of:
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21556237 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21556237 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.19
0.19161102 = product of:
0.38322204 = sum of:
0.09580551 = product of:
0.28741652 = sum of:
0.28741652 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28741652 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.28741652 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28741652 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.17
0.16765964 = product of:
0.33531928 = sum of:
0.08382982 = product of:
0.25148946 = sum of:
0.25148946 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25148946 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25148946 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25148946 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.12
0.11975689 = product of:
0.23951378 = sum of:
0.059878446 = product of:
0.17963533 = sum of:
0.17963533 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17963533 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17963533 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17963533 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002)
0.11
0.11020008 = product of:
0.22040015 = sum of:
0.10161209 = weight(_text_:policy in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10161209 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.11878806 = sum of:
0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075446084 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.043341983 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043341983 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
-
Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007)
0.10
0.0975346 = product of:
0.1950692 = sum of:
0.14225693 = weight(_text_:policy in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14225693 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.05281226 = product of:
0.10562452 = sum of:
0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10562452 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.10
0.09580551 = product of:
0.19161102 = sum of:
0.047902755 = product of:
0.14370826 = sum of:
0.14370826 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14370826 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14370826 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14370826 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002)
0.08
0.08386356 = product of:
0.16772711 = sum of:
0.14933866 = weight(_text_:policy in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14933866 = score(doc=3612,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.018388446 = product of:
0.036776893 = sum of:
0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036776893 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
- Date
- 2. 7.2005 12:22:50
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.07
0.06973944 = product of:
0.13947888 = sum of:
0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11496095 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.02451793 = product of:
0.04903586 = sum of:
0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04903586 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Hernon, P.; Relyea, H.C.: Information policy: United States (2009)
0.06
0.064265124 = product of:
0.2570605 = sum of:
0.2570605 = weight(_text_:policy in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2570605 = score(doc=3805,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
1.0597253 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Information policy, a field encompassing both public policy and information science, treats information as both a commodity-adheres to the economic theory of property rights-and a resource to be collected, protected, shared, manipulated, and managed. Although the literature often refers to information policy in the singular, there is no single all-encompassing policy. Rather, information policies tend to address specific issues and, at times, to be fragmented, overlapping, and contradictory.
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.06
0.06102201 = product of:
0.12204402 = sum of:
0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10059083 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
-
Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002)
0.06
0.06102201 = product of:
0.12204402 = sum of:
0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10059083 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001)
0.06
0.06102201 = product of:
0.12204402 = sum of:
0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10059083 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.021453189 = product of:
0.042906377 = sum of:
0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906377 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
- Date
- 22. 1.2007 20:46:57
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.06
0.05939403 = product of:
0.23757613 = sum of:
0.23757613 = sum of:
0.15089217 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15089217 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.6070458 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.086683966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086683966 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Arranged according to subjects the bibliography lists 79 references,mostly with terse abstracts.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.06
0.0584679 = product of:
0.1169358 = sum of:
0.10161209 = weight(_text_:policy in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10161209 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.015323706 = product of:
0.030647412 = sum of:
0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030647412 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rabina, D.; Johnston, S.: Information policy: European Union (2009)
0.06
0.056231983 = product of:
0.22492793 = sum of:
0.22492793 = weight(_text_:policy in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22492793 = score(doc=3804,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.9272596 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This entry provides an overview of European Union (EU) information policy, focusing on its formation, its goals, and its influence. European Union information policy refers to the legislation and strategies pertaining to the European policy for the creation of the information society. It is concerned with economic and industrial competitiveness, with an emphasis on the role that information and communication technologies play in revolutionizing everyday life, a broad goal with far reaching socioeconomic implications. This discussion, however, will be confined to information policy areas of greatest interest to information professionals, namely copyright and intellectual property, data protection and privacy, e-government and digitization.
-
LC Classification Outline (2003)
0.05
0.050295416 = product of:
0.20118167 = sum of:
0.20118167 = weight(_text_:policy in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20118167 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.8293662 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Editor
- Library of Congress / Office for Subject Cataloging Policy
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The intellectual foundation of information organization (2000)
0.05
0.050079614 = product of:
0.10015923 = sum of:
0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057480477 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
0.04267875 = product of:
0.0853575 = sum of:
0.0853575 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0853575 = score(doc=5056,freq=4.0), product of:
0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.343397 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -
- LCSH
- Bibliography / methodology
- Subject
- Bibliography / methodology
-
Maxwell, T.A.: Mapping information policy frames : the politics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (2004)
0.05
0.04819884 = product of:
0.19279537 = sum of:
0.19279537 = weight(_text_:policy in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19279537 = score(doc=2063,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04524064 = queryNorm
0.79479396 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was a significant milestone in congressional information policy legislation. However, the results were widely criticized in some circles as providing too much Power to certain stakeholder groups. This paper uses computerbased content analysis and a theoretical taxonomy of information policy values to analyze congressional hearing testimony. The results of document coding were then analyzed using a variety of statistical tools to map how different stakeholders framed issues in the debate and determine if congressional value statements about the legislation conformed more closely to certain stakeholders. Results of the analysis indicate that significant differences in the use of information policy terms occurred across stakeholders, and showed varying degrees of convergence between congressional or other stakeholders when framing information policy issues.
