Search (4581 results, page 2 of 230)

0.11975689 = product of:
  0.23951378 = sum of:
    0.059878446 = product of:
      0.17963533 = sum of:
        0.17963533 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17963533 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17963533 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17963533 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

0.11975689 = product of:
  0.23951378 = sum of:
    0.059878446 = product of:
      0.17963533 = sum of:
        0.17963533 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17963533 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17963533 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17963533 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.11975689 = product of:
  0.23951378 = sum of:
    0.059878446 = product of:
      0.17963533 = sum of:
        0.17963533 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17963533 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17963533 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17963533 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.11975689 = product of:
  0.23951378 = sum of:
    0.059878446 = product of:
      0.17963533 = sum of:
        0.17963533 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17963533 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17963533 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17963533 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.11697541 = product of:
  0.23395082 = sum of:
    0.21556237 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21556237 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.018388446 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036776893 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.11020008 = product of:
  0.22040015 = sum of:
    0.10161209 = weight(_text_:policy in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10161209 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
    0.11878806 = sum of:
      0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.075446084 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.043341983 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043341983 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.

0.10987543 = product of:
  0.43950173 = sum of:
    0.43950173 = sum of:
      0.34143 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.34143 = score(doc=5341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          1.373588 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.09807172 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09807172 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

17.10.1996 14:22:33

Source

Bulletin of bibliography. 53(1996) no.1, S.49-66

0.0975346 = product of:
  0.1950692 = sum of:
    0.14225693 = weight(_text_:policy in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14225693 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
    0.05281226 = product of:
      0.10562452 = sum of:
        0.10562452 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10562452 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.

Content

Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing

0.09603217 = product of:
  0.19206434 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 7903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=7903,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7903, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7903)
    0.09147352 = product of:
      0.18294704 = sum of:
        0.18294704 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 7903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18294704 = score(doc=7903,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.736004 = fieldWeight in 7903, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Describes the ways in which the Russian national bibliography is being transformed as democratic reforms proceed in Russia. A new law 'On the legal deposit of documents' has been introduced which sets out the state's policy with regard to organizing deposit copies of documents on which the national bibliography is based. The range of documents subject to registration and recording is broadening and new principles for the selection of publications are being applied as decreed by the Federal law on legal deposit. The information search language has been changed from the politically subjective 'Common classification of literature for book publishing' (EKL) to UDC. These changes are helping to consolidate Russia's place in the world as a reliable producer and user of national bibliographical information, and are making possible the direct compatibility of its databases with those of other countries

0.09580551 = product of:
  0.19161102 = sum of:
    0.047902755 = product of:
      0.14370826 = sum of:
        0.14370826 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14370826 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14370826 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14370826 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.09354863 = product of:
  0.18709727 = sum of:
    0.16257934 = weight(_text_:policy in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16257934 = score(doc=1810,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports on the Dewey Classification Editorial Policy Committee, Spring meeting 1997 which aimed to agree policies for the development of the classification over the next decade and put together a strategic plan to implement it. Details: themes for the future, the concept of edition, editorial policy on the relative index, manual, schedule development, and ways to determine areas for revision

Date

7. 8.1998 19:22:16

0.09354863 = product of:
  0.18709727 = sum of:
    0.16257934 = weight(_text_:policy in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16257934 = score(doc=5549,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
    0.02451793 = product of:
      0.04903586 = sum of:
        0.04903586 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04903586 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24

0.088914946 = product of:
  0.35565978 = sum of:
    0.35565978 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35565978 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38355064 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.

0.087993264 = product of:
  0.17598653 = sum of:
    0.16066281 = weight(_text_:policy in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16066281 = score(doc=1055,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.6623283 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
    0.015323706 = product of:
      0.030647412 = sum of:
        0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030647412 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Journal lists are instruments to categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications. Our study investigates the remarkable proliferation of such journal lists in China, analyses their underlying values, quality criteria and ranking principles, and specifies how concerns specific to the Chinese research policy and publishing system inform these lists. Discouraged lists of "bad journals" reflect concerns over inferior research publications, but also the involved drain on public resources. Endorsed lists of "good journals" are based on criteria valued in research policy, reflecting the distinctive administrative logic of state-led Chinese research and publishing policy, ascribing worth to scientific journals for its specific national and institutional needs. In this regard, the criteria used for journal list construction are contextual and reflect the challenges of public resource allocation in a market-led publication system. Chinese journal lists therefore reflect research policy changes, such as a shift away from output-dominated research evaluation, the specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions in the "qualify" and "disqualify" binary logic and demonstrate inherent tensions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.

Date

22. 9.2023 16:39:23

0.08386356 = product of:
  0.16772711 = sum of:
    0.14933866 = weight(_text_:policy in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14933866 = score(doc=685,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
    0.018388446 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036776893 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Notes the profound changes that are affecting countries worldwide and afffecting the development of information policies intended to shape their own particular information societies. Although it is possible to identify differences in the motivating factors, nevertheless the goals of these policies are remakably similar. It is possible to identify 2 broadly divergent models. One is based on neoliberal economic philosophies and emphasizes the importance of market led solutions, exploiting private capital. The alternative model can be described as dirigiste and is based on a much greater degree of intervention by the state and so emphasizes the role of the state as a participant rather than as a facilitator. Argues that the neoliberal policy mechanism, with their emphasis on narrow economic solutions, are likely to be inadequate and the more holistic apporach of the dirigiste model seems mot appropriate

Source

Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands

0.08386356 = product of:
  0.16772711 = sum of:
    0.14933866 = weight(_text_:policy in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14933866 = score(doc=3612,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.018388446 = product of:
      0.036776893 = sum of:
        0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036776893 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

0.08231329 = product of:
  0.16462658 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 3703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=3703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 3703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3703)
    0.07840587 = product of:
      0.15681174 = sum of:
        0.15681174 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 3703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15681174 = score(doc=3703,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.63086057 = fieldWeight in 3703, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The enforcement of the Press and Registration of Books Act in 1876 was the beginning of bibliographic activities in British India. In independent Pakistan, UNESCO had been the moving spirit in bibliographic developments. The 1st issue of the Pakistan National Bibliography (PNB) for 1962 appeared in 1966; subsequent issues too, appeared with a time lag of 2 to 5 years. The PNB covers only 30% of the country's total production owing to evasion of deposit laws by publishers. Numerous weaknesses were observed in PNB 1992 and PNB 1993, the 2 issues chosen as a test case, for instance: no uniform policy is followed for cataloguing and transliteration; inadequacy of DDC for classification of books on Islam and other oriental topics; lack of uniformity in choice of subject headings; and absence of authority files. The arrangements of the bibliography and layout of entries needs improvement. Recommends the computerization of PNB

0.08185506 = product of:
  0.16371012 = sum of:
    0.14225693 = weight(_text_:policy in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14225693 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.

Date

8.11.1995 11:52:22

0.08185506 = product of:
  0.16371012 = sum of:
    0.14225693 = weight(_text_:policy in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14225693 = score(doc=5542,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=5542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection. One possible model - a decision-making matrix to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery - is explored.

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.08185506 = product of:
  0.16371012 = sum of:
    0.14225693 = weight(_text_:policy in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14225693 = score(doc=913,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Interorganizational knowledge creation has become a crucial factor for successful management of corporations in the environment surrounding them today. Collaboration with other organizations is indispensable for a corporation to resolve complex and Jong range issues such as customer satisfaction and sustainable development. One of the most fundamental obstacles in creating knowledge among organizations is partial or incomplete communication due to incommensurable point of view. Policy exercises can improve commensurability and facilitate inter-organizational knowledge creation by providing a shared model of the system under investigation. This paper will discuss it taking Intelligent Transportation System (TTS) Deployment Exercises as an example.

Source

Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers