Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Hufford, J.R.: Use studies and OPACs (1991) 0.11
    0.11265405 = product of:
      0.28163514 = sum of:
        0.14994287 = weight(_text_:great in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14994287 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
        0.13169226 = product of:
          0.26338452 = sum of:
            0.26338452 = weight(_text_:britain in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26338452 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3194365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the major catalog use studies that have been conducted in the United States and Great Britain. The potential to influence the construction of new online public access catalogs is emphasized. The cumulative findings could serve as an information base which designers of OPAC systems could refer to in the course of their work
  2. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.08
    0.07885784 = product of:
      0.1971446 = sum of:
        0.10496002 = weight(_text_:great in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10496002 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.09218458 = product of:
          0.18436916 = sum of:
            0.18436916 = weight(_text_:britain in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18436916 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3194365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.57717 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  3. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.04
    0.042945504 = product of:
      0.10736376 = sum of:
        0.08996573 = weight(_text_:great in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08996573 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.017398031 = product of:
          0.034796063 = sum of:
            0.034796063 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034796063 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Wildemuth, B.M.: Effective methods for studying information seeking and use : Introduction and overview (2002) 0.04
    0.03578792 = product of:
      0.0894698 = sum of:
        0.07497144 = weight(_text_:great in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07497144 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
        0.01449836 = product of:
          0.02899672 = sum of:
            0.02899672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02899672 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In conjunction with the American Society for Information Science and Technology's (ASIST) annual meeting in fall 2001, the Special Interest Group an Information Needs, Seeking, and Use (SIG USE) sponsored a research symposium an "Effective Methods for Studying Information Seeking and Use." The symposium was intended to address the SIG's goal of promoting studies of human information behavior by focusing an the research methods that can most effectively be used to study information needs, information seeking, information use, and other human information behaviors. The symposium included the presentation of six refereed articles, which were revised based an the discussion at the symposium and are included here. The six articles describe the application of a variety of research methods, singly or in combination. Some of the methods are most appropriate for studying individuals and their interactions with information, while others can be applied to studying group behaviors. The studies were conducted in a variety of settings, from a Web-searching laboratory to an archive, from hospitals to the great outdoors (i.e., forest and river sites). Each method or set of methods was applied to a particular user group, including young children, teenagers, and adults. Each article makes a unique contribution to our repertoire of research methods, as briefly reviewed here.
    Date
    20. 1.2003 9:37:22
  5. McQueen, T.F.; Fleck, R.A. Jr.: Changing patterns of Internet usage and challenges at colleges and universities (2005) 0.02
    0.019034587 = product of:
      0.095172934 = sum of:
        0.095172934 = weight(_text_:policy in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095172934 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Increased enrollments, changing student expectations, and shifting patterns of Internet access and usage continue to generate resource and administrative challenges for colleges and universities. Computer center staff and college administrators must balance increased access demands, changing system loads, and system security within constrained resources. To assess the changing academic computing environment, computer center directors from several geographic regions were asked to respond to an online questionnaire that assessed patterns of usage, resource allocation, policy formulation, and threats. Survey results were compared with data from a study conducted by the authors in 1999. The analysis includes changing patterns in Internet usage, access, and supervision. The paper also presents details of usage by institutional type and application as well as recommendations for more precise resource assessment by college administrators.
  6. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.02
    0.017993147 = product of:
      0.08996573 = sum of:
        0.08996573 = weight(_text_:great in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08996573 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  7. Pasanen-Tuomainen, I.: Does access meet availability at an OPAC? (1993) 0.02
    0.016315361 = product of:
      0.0815768 = sum of:
        0.0815768 = weight(_text_:policy in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0815768 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 1992 IATUL seminar in Tallinn, estonia: 'Universal Availability of Publications in Science and Technology including those on the history and philosophy of grey literature' on UAP policy and practice. Discusses surveys conducted at the Helsinki Univ. of Technology Library analysing the use of the online catalogue. Covers the Internordic Study 'Monitoring the Online Catalogues of the Nordic Technical University Libraries', whose aim was the promotion of end-user accessibility to information as part of a training program. Users' search behaviour was observed during the course on the library's TENTTU information retrieval system. Analyses the transaction log files of end users. Presents statistics on the distribution of search elements in free text and field codes and the use of Boolean operators. Comments on a software package enabling analysis of the interaction between the system and the end user. This may be useful to evaluate training programs
  8. Matus, G.S.; Mendoza, E.S.; Duran, C.V.C.: Estudio comparativo de los usuarios reales y potenciales de bases de datos cientificas : una experiencia y una reflexion en la Universidad de Concepcion (1994) 0.02
    0.016315361 = product of:
      0.0815768 = sum of:
        0.0815768 = weight(_text_:policy in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0815768 = score(doc=1519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports of a study in a Chilean university library, comparing 100 users of online databases and CD-ROMs with 100 users of non-computerized bibliographical resources. Results showed that users tended to be teachers / researchers, and potential users were postgraduate students. Comparison of search results showed online searching improved results and saved time. The chief reasons for non-use were ignorance of the service and use of own personal computer. The study indicated the need to review policy on database acquisition and improve promotion of the service. In general, librarians should motivate greater use of online searching by providing skilled intermediary services to maximize uptake
  9. Yao, M.Z.; Rice, R.E.; Wallis, K.: Predicting user concerns about online privacy (2007) 0.02
    0.016315361 = product of:
      0.0815768 = sum of:
        0.0815768 = weight(_text_:policy in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0815768 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid diffusion of the Internet, researchers, policy makers, and users have raised concerns about online privacy, although few studies have integrated aspects of usage with psychological and attitudinal aspects of privacy. This study develops a model involving gender, generalized self-efficacy, psychological need for privacy, Internet use experience, Internet use fluency, and beliefs in privacy rights as potential influences on online privacy concerns. Survey responses from 413 college students were analyzed by bivariate correlations, hierarchical regression, and structural equation modeling. Regression results showed that beliefs in privacy rights and a psychological need for privacy were the main influences on online privacy concerns. The proposed structural model was not well supported by the data, but a revised model, linking self-efficacy with psychological need for privacy and indicating indirect influences of Internet experience and fluency on online privacy concerns about privacy through beliefs in privacy rights, was supported by the data.
  10. Coleman, A.S.: Knowledge structures and the vocabulary of engineering novices (2004) 0.01
    0.01199543 = product of:
      0.05997715 = sum of:
        0.05997715 = weight(_text_:great in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05997715 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction A small study is described which investigated the vocabulary as reflected in the knowledge structures of novices. The research was conducted in order to understand how knowledge organization tools may be designed to meet the needs of novices in the GROW digital library. GROW is the Geo-technical, Rock, and Water digital library, the first step in the establishment of a National Civil Engineering Resources Library (NCERL). Digital libraries are complex entities that have many components: besides the collections of individual resources and the interface to these resources, they have organization, labelling, navigation and searching systems. Controlled vocabularies and thesauri are often the invisible components. This study is based an the premise that the controlled vocabulary influences the above mentioned related components in the digital library. We felt that it was important to understand the knowledge structures of a primary group of user, the novice - the student learner - who is new to the domain. A great deal of research has been done about how people learn and how people use information, but fewer studies link science knowledge structures, vocabulary, and language use.
  11. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.01
    0.008119082 = product of:
      0.04059541 = sum of:
        0.04059541 = product of:
          0.08119082 = sum of:
            0.08119082 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08119082 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  12. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.008119082 = product of:
      0.04059541 = sum of:
        0.04059541 = product of:
          0.08119082 = sum of:
            0.08119082 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08119082 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  13. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.01
    0.0069592125 = product of:
      0.034796063 = sum of:
        0.034796063 = product of:
          0.069592126 = sum of:
            0.069592126 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069592126 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  14. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.00
    0.0046394756 = product of:
      0.023197377 = sum of:
        0.023197377 = product of:
          0.046394754 = sum of:
            0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046394754 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  15. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.00
    0.0046394756 = product of:
      0.023197377 = sum of:
        0.023197377 = product of:
          0.046394754 = sum of:
            0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046394754 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  16. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.00
    0.0046394756 = product of:
      0.023197377 = sum of:
        0.023197377 = product of:
          0.046394754 = sum of:
            0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046394754 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  17. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.00
    0.0046394756 = product of:
      0.023197377 = sum of:
        0.023197377 = product of:
          0.046394754 = sum of:
            0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046394754 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  18. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.00
    0.004059541 = product of:
      0.020297704 = sum of:
        0.020297704 = product of:
          0.04059541 = sum of:
            0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04059541 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  19. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.00
    0.004059541 = product of:
      0.020297704 = sum of:
        0.020297704 = product of:
          0.04059541 = sum of:
            0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04059541 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  20. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.00
    0.004059541 = product of:
      0.020297704 = sum of:
        0.020297704 = product of:
          0.04059541 = sum of:
            0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04059541 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042803947 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22

Years

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 2
  • nl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 41
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…