-
Johnson, W.G.: ¬The need for a value-based reference policy : John Rawls at the reference desk (1994)
0.04
0.037678715 = product of:
0.18839356 = sum of:
0.18839356 = weight(_text_:policy in 2457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18839356 = score(doc=2457,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.82085973 = fieldWeight in 2457, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2457)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- A value-based reference policy satisfies both the practical convcerns of the reference librarian and the principles stated in the Library Bill of Rights and the ALA Code of Ethics. One such value is justice, as described by John Rawls in 'A Theory of Justice'. A reference policy based on Rawls' system provides equitable service to all members of an academic community while permitting the librarian to uphold the ideal of freedom of access to information
-
Slota, S.C.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Greenberg, S.; Verma, N.; Cummings, B.; Li, L.; Shenefiel, C.: Locating the work of artificial intelligence ethics (2023)
0.02
0.023073403 = product of:
0.11536702 = sum of:
0.11536702 = weight(_text_:policy in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11536702 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.50267184 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The scale and complexity of the data and algorithms used in artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems present significant challenges for anticipating their ethical, legal, and policy implications. Given these challenges, who does the work of AI ethics, and how do they do it? This study reports findings from interviews with 26 stakeholders in AI research, law, and policy. The primary themes are that the work of AI ethics is structured by personal values and professional commitments, and that it involves situated meaning-making through data and algorithms. Given the stakes involved, it is not enough to simply satisfy that AI will not behave unethically; rather, the work of AI ethics needs to be incentivized.
-
Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005)
0.02
0.019095043 = product of:
0.047737606 = sum of:
0.03748572 = weight(_text_:great in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03748572 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.15552977 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.010251889 = product of:
0.020503778 = sum of:
0.020503778 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020503778 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Classification
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- DDC
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- Footnote
- Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
-
Dane, F.C.: ¬The importance of the sources of professional obligations (2014)
0.01
0.014994288 = product of:
0.07497144 = sum of:
0.07497144 = weight(_text_:great in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07497144 = score(doc=3367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The study of philosophy provides many general benefits to members of any field or discipline, the easiest of which to defend are an appreciation of, and experience with, critical thinking, including the ability to apply principles thoughtfully and logically in a variety of contexts; it is the discipline that, according to Plato, Socrates believed made life worth living. Today, however, most disciplines can lay claim to critical thinking - information science certainly involves a great deal of logical analysis - but only philosophy, in the Western world, can lay claim to having developed logic and critical thinking and thereby may have furthered the process more than any other discipline. Historically, philosophy is also the discipline in which one learns how to think about the most complex and important questions including questions about what is right and proper; that is, philosophy arguably lays claim to the development of ethics. Before going further, I should note that I am neither a philosopher nor an information scientist. I am a social psychologist and statistician whose interests have brought me into the realm of practical ethics primarily through ethical issues relevant to empirical research. I should also note that I am firmly in the camp of those who consider there to be an important distinction between morals and ethics; as do others, I argue that moral judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not rules, defined broadly, are followed, whereas ethical judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not a particular rule is worthwhile and, when there are incompatible rules, which rule should be granted higher priority.
-
Fernández-Molina, J.C.; Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.: Ethical aspects of knowledge organization and representation in the digital environment : their articulation in professional codes of ethics (2003)
0.01
0.013596135 = product of:
0.06798068 = sum of:
0.06798068 = weight(_text_:policy in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06798068 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Studies an ethical aspects of our profession rarely focus an matters related with the organization and representation of knowledge, but are directed instead toward such subjects as intellectual property, right to privacy, intellectual freedom, or proper professional conduct. Nonetheless, the technological possibilities nowadays have meant a radical change. In the past, a certain policy for indexing or a classification system produced effects only in the relatively limited setting of a library or information center; but now the indexing or classification of certain electronic information resources has effects that go far beyond the physical boundaries of such institutions, or even those of a country. The objective of the present study is, an the one hand, to identify the principal ethical values related with the organization and representation of knowledge, and an the other hand, to see to what degree they are addressed by the ethical codes of professional associations.
-
Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:57:43
-
Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
-
Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 13.10.2006 10:22:03
-
O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:50:50
-
Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 25.12.2019 14:19:22
-
Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993)
0.00
0.004059541 = product of:
0.020297704 = sum of:
0.020297704 = product of:
0.04059541 = sum of:
0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04059541 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008)
0.00
0.004059541 = product of:
0.020297704 = sum of:
0.020297704 = product of:
0.04059541 = sum of:
0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04059541 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 17. 3.2008 15:17:22
-
Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008)
0.00
0.0028996721 = product of:
0.01449836 = sum of:
0.01449836 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02899672 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 6.2008 12:22:41
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.00
0.0028996721 = product of:
0.01449836 = sum of:
0.01449836 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02899672 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.00
0.0020297705 = product of:
0.010148852 = sum of:
0.010148852 = product of:
0.020297704 = sum of:
0.020297704 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020297704 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.00
0.0017398031 = product of:
0.008699016 = sum of:
0.008699016 = product of:
0.017398031 = sum of:
0.017398031 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017398031 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
