-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.04
0.04425502 = product of:
0.110637546 = sum of:
0.096139185 = weight(_text_:policy in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096139185 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.01449836 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02899672 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Pohl, A.: OCLC, WorldCat und die Metadaten-Kontroverse (2009)
0.03
0.030764539 = product of:
0.15382269 = sum of:
0.15382269 = weight(_text_:policy in 2780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15382269 = score(doc=2780,freq=16.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 2780, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2780)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Mit der Ankündigung einer "Policy for Use and Transfer of WorldCat Records" hat OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) in der angelsächsischen Bibliothekswelt eine lebhafte Diskussion hervorgerufen. Im deutschsprachigen Raum hat die geplante Policy allerdings bisher sehr wenig Resonanz gefunden. Ein Grund mag darin liegen, dass OCLC in Europa (noch) deutlich weniger Gewicht hat als in den USA. Sicher hätte das Inkrafttreten einer OCLC-Metadaten-Policy (ganz gleich, wie sie ausgestaltet sein mag) weitreichende Auswirkungen auf das weltweite Bibliothekswesen. Eine Beschäftigung mit dem Thema ist also mehr als angebracht. Dieser Artikel dient dem Zweck, den Stand der Diskussion im angelsächsischen Raum wiederzugeben und einen Einblick in die verschiedenen Aspekte der Auseinandersetzung zu geben.
- Content
- "Hintergründe Das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) mit Sitz in Dublin (Ohio) präsentiert sich als eine Non-Profit-Mitgliederorganisation, "die sich im öffentlichen Interesse für den breiteren, computergestützten Zugang zum weltweiten Wissen und die Senkung der damit verbundenen Kosten einsetzt." Im globalen Maßstab ist OCLC die größte Organisation im Bibliothekswesen, mit knapp 70.000 Mitgliedsbibliotheken in über 100 Ländern . Das Fundament von OCLC bildet der WorldCat, dessen Konzept dem eines Verbundkatalogs entspricht: eine bibliografische Online-Datenbank für die gemeinsame Katalogisierung, in der auch die Bestandsdaten der beteiligten Bibliotheken erfasst sind. Auf dieser Datenbank baut eine große Zahl der OCLC-Dienstleistungen auf, seien dies Katalogisierungs- und Metadatendienste, Recherchewerkzeuge für Endnutzer, Fernleihdienste oder Bestandsanalyse- und -managementwerkzeuge. Für die Teilnahme am WorldCat sowie die Fremddatenübernahme aus dem WorldCat berechnet OCLC den Mitgliedsinstitutionen nicht unbeträchtliche Summen. Die Einnahmen aus WorldCat-Gebühren und Fremddatendiensten machen mehr als ein Drittel der Gesamteinnahmen OCLCs aus: Im Steuerjahr 2007/2008 betrugen die Einnahmen OCLCs aus Metadatendiensten nach Unternehmensangaben 85,8 Millionen US-$. Das sind knapp 35% der Gesamteinnahmen von 246,4 Millionen US-$ im selben Jahr.6 Man kann OCLC also ein großes finanzielles Interesse daran unterstellen, diesen Datenpool weiterhin unter eigener Kontrolle zu halten, damit die gewohnten Gewinnströme nicht versiegen. Vor diesem Hintergrund nimmt es nicht wunder, dass OCLC versucht eine Policy einzuführen, welche die Geldströme auch in Zukunft sichern soll. Mit der Ankündigung dieser rechtsverbindlichen Regelung hat OCLC Anfang November 2008 die Gemüter kritischer Bibliothekare und von Open-Data-Verfechtern erhitzt. Viele Passagen der Policy erwecken den Eindruck, dass sich OCLC ein Monopol auf die WorldCat-Daten sichern will und Konkurrenz auszuschalten versucht. Die Reaktionen - besonders in der US-amerikanischen Blogosphäre - waren harsch, wodurch bereits einige Änderungen der Policy erreicht worden sind. Mitte Januar hat OCLC nun als Erwiderung auf die vehemente Kritik den geplanten Termin des Inkrafttretens der Policy nach hinten verlegt: von Mitte Februar auf das Dritte Quartal 2009. Mit dem Review "Board of Shared Data Creation and Stewardship" hat OCLC zudem ein Gremium einberufen, das indessen mit OCLC-Mitgliedern und anderen Beteiligten in Kontakt treten soll, um den Policy-Entwurf zu überarbeiten."
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.03
0.028630337 = product of:
0.07157584 = sum of:
0.05997715 = weight(_text_:great in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05997715 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.011598689 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023197377 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Cataloging rules and principles : a critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision (1953)
0.02
0.021753816 = product of:
0.108769074 = sum of:
0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108769074 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Issue
- Prepared for the Board on Cataloging Policy and Research of the A.L.A. Division of Cataloging and Classification.
-
Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978)
0.02
0.019034587 = product of:
0.095172934 = sum of:
0.095172934 = weight(_text_:policy in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095172934 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.01
0.01199543 = product of:
0.05997715 = sum of:
0.05997715 = weight(_text_:great in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05997715 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.009517293 = product of:
0.047586467 = sum of:
0.047586467 = weight(_text_:policy in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047586467 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.20734155 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.01
0.009278951 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = product of:
0.09278951 = sum of:
0.09278951 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09278951 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.01
0.009278951 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = product of:
0.09278951 = sum of:
0.09278951 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09278951 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.01
0.008996573 = product of:
0.044982865 = sum of:
0.044982865 = weight(_text_:great in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044982865 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.18663573 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.01
0.0069592125 = product of:
0.034796063 = sum of:
0.034796063 = product of:
0.069592126 = sum of:
0.069592126 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069592126 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.01
0.0069592125 = product of:
0.034796063 = sum of:
0.034796063 = product of:
0.069592126 = sum of:
0.069592126 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069592126 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.0069592125 = product of:
0.034796063 = sum of:
0.034796063 = product of:
0.069592126 = sum of:
0.069592126 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069592126 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.01
0.0057993443 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = product of:
0.05799344 = sum of:
0.05799344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05799344 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.01
0.0057993443 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = product of:
0.05799344 = sum of:
0.05799344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05799344 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.01
0.0057993443 = product of:
0.02899672 = sum of:
0.02899672 = product of:
0.05799344 = sum of:
0.05799344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05799344 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.00
0.004920907 = product of:
0.024604535 = sum of:
0.024604535 = product of:
0.04920907 = sum of:
0.04920907 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920907 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.00
0.0046394756 = product of:
0.023197377 = sum of:
0.023197377 = product of:
0.046394754 = sum of:
0.046394754 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046394754 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042803947 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
