Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

0.08682629 = product of:
  0.13023943 = sum of:
    0.11291965 = weight(_text_:resources in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11291965 = score(doc=162,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.6049638 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.017319772 = product of:
      0.034639545 = sum of:
        0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034639545 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Source

Library resources and technical services. 46(2002) no.2, S.39-49

0.050106924 = product of:
  0.075160384 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
    0.022464553 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044929106 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Information management report. 1998, May, S.7

0.035790663 = product of:
  0.053685993 = sum of:
    0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037639882 = score(doc=980,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
    0.016046109 = product of:
      0.032092217 = sum of:
        0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032092217 = score(doc=980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A bibliography is traditionally characterized by the judgments, bounded by explicit selection criteria, made by a single compiler. Because these criteria concern the attributes ascribed to a work and the needs of readers, bibliographic work is largely conceptual even across technological eras and domains. Yet, the development of networked information services, made possible by WWW infrastructure, has enabled very large numbers of people to discover, organize, and publish information, including bibliographies. Indeed, bibliographies, or at least bibliography-like artifacts, are a common genre of website, often published by people without specialized skills in information organization who follow non-rigorous selection procedures. Nevertheless, even if the items from these lists are poorly selected and described, this publishing activity is fundamentally important because it structures information locally, creating a patchy network of secondary access points. In turn, these access points enable information discovery, the formation and development of communities of interest, the estimation of document relevance by search engines, and so on. In sum, this activity, and the enabling technical infrastructure, invites bibliographies to take on new interactive possibilities. The aim of this article is to extend the traditional view of bibliography to encompass collaborative possibilities for wide, or narrow, participation in the shaping of bibliographies and the selection of items. This is done by examining the nature of bibliography on the Web, by proposing a conceptual model that opens bibliography to participatory practices, and by discussing a case study where a team sought to develop a bibliography of electronic resources. This examination reveals splendid opportunities for expanding the notion of bibliography with participatory policies while remaining true to its ancient roots.

Source

Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.805-825

0.035590272 = product of:
  0.10677081 = sum of:
    0.10677081 = sum of:
      0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05134755 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
      0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055423267 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.1999 19:45:53

Source

Information management report. 1998, Jul, S.9-10

0.035130557 = product of:
  0.10539167 = sum of:
    0.10539167 = weight(_text_:resources in 6222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10539167 = score(doc=6222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.56463283 = fieldWeight in 6222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6222)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.035130557 = product of:
  0.10539167 = sum of:
    0.10539167 = weight(_text_:resources in 6912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10539167 = score(doc=6912,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.56463283 = fieldWeight in 6912, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6912)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.028389778 = product of:
  0.08516933 = sum of:
    0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 2401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08516933 = score(doc=2401,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 2401, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2401)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The following 2 bibliographies were prepared by the authors and submitted to Pierian Press in MARC format to facilitate dual employment of the resources: as a text file in RSR, and to be integrated, in whole or in part, into the Pierian Press MARC database, Directory of National Helplines. In this note, publisher Ed Wall describes the process of preparing resources in MARC format and their conversion to print

0.026077677 = product of:
  0.078233026 = sum of:
    0.078233026 = weight(_text_:resources in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078233026 = score(doc=6056,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.4191312 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Internet challenges designers of reference resources to structure user interfaces so that they facilitate quick access to bibliographies. Designers can organize bibliographies in chronological order of publication, alphabetical listing by author or title and/or subject-headings; or can follow a subject classification scheme from the relevant field. Chronological order of publication and alphabetical listings of authors and titles are the simplest ways to organize bibliographic materials, but these methods usually fall to present the thematic relations among the various items. The subject classification is the most systematic presentation, but the most complicated to develop. This study explores the subject classification model, elaborates its rationale, demonstrates an exemplary faceted subject classification scheme grounded in solid scientific foundations, and clarifies the scientific foundations of the three-phase structuring methodology that was utilized. The exemplary classificatory model is a seven-facet subject classification scheme designed for classifying scholarly papers in the field of Logotherapy. The study, in particular the scientific structuring methodology, provides an example for structuring bibliographic resources in the social sciences, as well as in other academic fields

0.026077677 = product of:
  0.078233026 = sum of:
    0.078233026 = weight(_text_:resources in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078233026 = score(doc=4362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.4191312 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

To assist the IFLA Bibliography Section in gathering more comprehensive information on selection criteria used by national bibliographic agencies in preparing their countries' national bibliography, the Section crafted a survey that the Section chair and the Oslo Programme chair sent electronically and in print form. With the exponential availability of Web and other digital resources, the Section felt a critical need to address how national bibliographic agencies were incorporating these resources into the national bibliography. In preparation for the Section's Programme during the 71st IFLA World Library and Information Congress, the survey was sent to forty-four national libraries and bibliographic agencies in Europe. We restricted dissemination of the survey to European countries, in line with the Section's strategy to plan its programmes in ways that focused on what was happening in the area of the world where the IFLA Congress was being convened. This paper gives an analysis of the data submitted in the responses.

0.025093256 = product of:
  0.075279765 = sum of:
    0.075279765 = weight(_text_:resources in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075279765 = score(doc=1845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.024841055 = product of:
  0.074523166 = sum of:
    0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 7902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074523166 = score(doc=7902,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 7902, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7902)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Discusses the frustrations and challenges of compiling bibliographies that include WWW references. Search and retrieval skills acquired using older online sources are not always transferable to the Web, and evaluation and authentication of resources remain poor. Cited references frequently disappear, leading to complaints from bibliography users. The Web has also changed many users' perceptions of what they should get from other information providers, increasing their expectations and demands, particularly for the more frequent updating of bibliographies. Suggests a partnership approach can help, where users feed back information about the availability of resources they are seeking; this can have many benefits for both parties

0.020074604 = product of:
  0.06022381 = sum of:
    0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 6426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06022381 = score(doc=6426,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 6426, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6426)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Considers South Africa's national bibliographic activities in the light of the need for more equitable access to information resources. Outlines several factors which are important for improving access to information for previously marginalized communities, and for general development purposes. The issues include: funds available for existing and prospective services; the heterogeneous clientele for future services; the phenomenon of composite CD-ROMs; the question of ownership of bibliographic tools; standardization problems; cooperative bibliographic activities; the information value of grey literature; and recognizing the broader base of stakeholders in national bibliographic services

0.018474422 = product of:
  0.055423267 = sum of:
    0.055423267 = product of:
      0.110846534 = sum of:
        0.110846534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110846534 = score(doc=1135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.018474422 = product of:
  0.055423267 = sum of:
    0.055423267 = product of:
      0.110846534 = sum of:
        0.110846534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110846534 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 5.1999 18:14:05

0.017565278 = product of:
  0.052695833 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 4609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=4609,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 4609, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4609)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reviews BIBLINK, an EC funded project that is attempting to create links between national bibliographic agencies and the publishers of electronic resources. The project focuses on the flow of information, primarily in the form of metadata, between publishers and national libraries. Describes related work carried out by the Library of Congress with regard to its Electronic CIP Program. Includes studies of metadata formats in use and an investigation of the potential for format conversion

0.017565278 = product of:
  0.052695833 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The article focuses on the EBSCO databases that provide services to libraries. The Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) include resources focusing on librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, and information science. LISTA has more than 21,000 articles from more than 600 periodicals and includes more than 5,000 conference papers and reports. In the database, there are also cited references and the number of times the source was used can also be found within the database. These are helpful tips in bibliography researching. The database has also several search options including "Basic Search," "Advanced Search," and Indexes." The EBSCOhost interface is simple to use and easy to grasp while LISTA is a free abstract database.

0.017565278 = product of:
  0.052695833 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This article contains a discussion of the bibliographical databases of the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland. Along with the national bibliographies are included catalogs, union catalogs and centralized services insofar as they have national significance for each country. German-language book production is reported on in many bibliographical databases, at the moment predominantly in printed form. However, an increasing readiness for the production and use of databases in electronic form is noticeable. It is to be wished that the necessity of better and more economical use of bibliographical resources will lead to increasing coordination and cooperation in the German-speaking countries.

0.017565278 = product of:
  0.052695833 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Working group on Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies was established in 2004 has started the work with an analysis of users and contexts of use of national bibliographies (NB) in the digital age. National bibliographies are changing dramatically: they include more and more also bibliographic records for digital resources and national bibliographic agencies are increasingly complementing (or even replacing) printed versions of NB with electronic. The guidelines will be soon posted for the world-wide review; this paper gives and overview of the document prepared so far.

0.01616512 = product of:
  0.04849536 = sum of:
    0.04849536 = product of:
      0.09699072 = sum of:
        0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 8997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09699072 = score(doc=8997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Süddeutsche Zeitung. Nr.xx vom 21./22./23.5.1994, S

0.01616512 = product of:
  0.04849536 = sum of:
    0.04849536 = product of:
      0.09699072 = sum of:
        0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 4006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09699072 = score(doc=4006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 8.1999 20:13:43