-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.13
0.1277046 = product of:
0.1915569 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.12767991 = sum of:
0.08611246 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611246 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.08
0.082906336 = product of:
0.1243595 = sum of:
0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08516933 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.03919017 = product of:
0.07838034 = sum of:
0.07838034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07838034 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.06
0.058623634 = product of:
0.08793545 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.06
0.058623634 = product of:
0.08793545 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.06
0.058623634 = product of:
0.08793545 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.3, S.165-178
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.06
0.058623634 = product of:
0.08793545 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper will describe the way in which the USMARC cataloging schema is used at the Eisenhower National Clearing-house (ENC). Discussion will include how ENC MARC extensions were developed for cataloging mathematics and science curriculum resources, and how the ENC workflow is integrated into the cataloging interface. The discussion will conclude with a historical look at the in-house data transfer from ENC MARC to the current production of IEEE LOM XML encoding for record sharing and OAI compliance, required under the NSDL project guidelines.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001)
0.05
0.048266005 = product of:
0.072399005 = sum of:
0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045167856 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.027231153 = product of:
0.054462306 = sum of:
0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054462306 = score(doc=1323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.04
0.04396772 = product of:
0.06595158 = sum of:
0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045167856 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.2, S.130-143
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.04
0.036639772 = product of:
0.054959655 = sum of:
0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037639882 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.017319772 = product of:
0.034639545 = sum of:
0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034639545 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.2, S.71-76
-
MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000)
0.04
0.036639772 = product of:
0.054959655 = sum of:
0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037639882 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.017319772 = product of:
0.034639545 = sum of:
0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034639545 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.135-140
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬An examination of data elements for bibliographic description : toward a conceptual schema for the USMARC formats (1992)
0.04
0.035130557 = product of:
0.10539167 = sum of:
0.10539167 = weight(_text_:resources in 4822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10539167 = score(doc=4822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.56463283 = fieldWeight in 4822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4822)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 36(1992), S.189-208
-
Guenther, R.; McCallum, S.: New metadata standards for digital resources : MODS and METS (2003)
0.04
0.035130557 = product of:
0.10539167 = sum of:
0.10539167 = weight(_text_:resources in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10539167 = score(doc=1250,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.56463283 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata has taken an a new took with the advent of XML and digital resources. XML provides a new versatile structure for tagging and packaging metadata as the rapid proliferation of digital resources demands both rapidly produced descriptive data and the encoding of more types of metadata. Two emerging standards are attempting to harness these developments for library needs. The first is the Metadata Object and Description Schema (MODS), a MARC-compatible XML schema for encoding descriptive data. The second standard is the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS), a highly flexible XML schema for packaging the descriptive metadata and various other important types of metadata needed to assure the use and preservation of digital resources.
-
Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989)
0.03
0.03114149 = product of:
0.09342447 = sum of:
0.09342447 = sum of:
0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044929106 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:51:36
-
Nichols introduces MARCit (1998)
0.03
0.030111905 = product of:
0.09033571 = sum of:
0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033571 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.483971 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for access : a cataloging guide (2000)
0.03
0.030111905 = product of:
0.09033571 = sum of:
0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033571 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.483971 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999)
0.03
0.030111905 = product of:
0.09033571 = sum of:
0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033571 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.483971 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
