Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999) 0.06
    0.05644048 = product of:
      0.08466072 = sum of:
        0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063876994 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    University librarians continue to face the difficult task of determining which journals remain crucial for their collections during these times of static financial resources and escalating journal costs. One evaluative tool, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), recently has become available on CD-ROM, making it simpler for librarians to use its citation data as input for ranking journals. But many librarians remain unconvinced that the global citation data from the JCR bears enough correspondence to their local situation to be useful. In this project, I explore the correlation between global citation data available from JCR with local citation data generated specifically for the University of British Columbia, for 20 subject fields in the sciences and social sciences. The significant correlations obtained in this study suggest that large research-oriented university libraries could consider substituting global citation data for local citation data when evaluating their journals, with certain cautions.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.2, S.67-77
  2. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.05
    0.05181646 = product of:
      0.07772469 = sum of:
        0.053230833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053230833 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28518265 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.024493856 = product of:
          0.048987713 = sum of:
            0.048987713 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048987713 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  3. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.04
    0.037344903 = product of:
      0.11203471 = sum of:
        0.11203471 = sum of:
          0.06353935 = weight(_text_:management in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06353935 = score(doc=3689,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849536 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  4. Chung, Y.-K.: Core international journals of classification systems : an application of Bradford's law (1994) 0.02
    0.017565278 = product of:
      0.052695833 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    By analyzing the source documents and their references by classification systems researchers in the world, this paper presents core journals of the field during the period 1981-1990. The findings show that journal literature in this study confirms to Bradford's law and provides 'Cataloging and classification quarterly (CCQ)' as the most productive journbal, 'Library resources and technical services (LRTS)' as the most frequently cited journal of the field and 'Knowledge organization (KO)', formerly 'International classification (IC)' as the second productive and frequently cited journal of the field. The principal journals publishing source items differs from those used as reference sources of the field. The high-ranked international journals over the years are clearly those to be acquired to obtain the greatest coverage of the field for the least cost
  5. Williams, J.; Clark, J.D.: ¬The information explosion : fact or myth? (1992) 0.02
    0.01711585 = product of:
      0.05134755 = sum of:
        0.05134755 = product of:
          0.1026951 = sum of:
            0.1026951 = weight(_text_:management in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1026951 = score(doc=1081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    IEEE transactions on engineering management. 39(1992) no.1, S.79-84
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.016329238 = product of:
      0.048987713 = sum of:
        0.048987713 = product of:
          0.097975425 = sum of:
            0.097975425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097975425 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.01616512 = product of:
      0.04849536 = sum of:
        0.04849536 = product of:
          0.09699072 = sum of:
            0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09699072 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  8. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.01616512 = product of:
      0.04849536 = sum of:
        0.04849536 = product of:
          0.09699072 = sum of:
            0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09699072 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.01616512 = product of:
      0.04849536 = sum of:
        0.04849536 = product of:
          0.09699072 = sum of:
            0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09699072 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  10. Butkovich, N.J.: Reshelving study of review literature in the physical sciences (1996) 0.02
    0.015055953 = product of:
      0.045167856 = sum of:
        0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 5720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045167856 = score(doc=5720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 5720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5720)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 40(1996) no.2, S.139-144
  11. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  12. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  13. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  14. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  15. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  16. Rivas, A.L.; Deshler, J.D.; Quimby, F.W.; Mohammend, H.O.; Wilson, D.J.; Gonzales, R.N.; Lein, D.H.; Bruso, P.: Interdisciplinary question generation : synthesis and validity analysis of the 1993-1997 bovine mastitis related literature (1998) 0.01
    0.008557925 = product of:
      0.025673775 = sum of:
        0.025673775 = product of:
          0.05134755 = sum of:
            0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 5124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05134755 = score(doc=5124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes research in which interdisciplinary synthesis and validity analysis (ISVA), a structured learning approach which integrates learning and communication theories, meta analytic evaluation methods, and literature management related technologies, was applied in the context of the 1993-1997 bovine mastitis research literature. The study investigated whether ISVA could facilitate the analysis and synthesis of interdisciplinary knowledge claims and generate projects or research questions
  17. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.00808256 = product of:
      0.02424768 = sum of:
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  18. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.01
    0.00808256 = product of:
      0.02424768 = sum of:
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  19. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.01
    0.00808256 = product of:
      0.02424768 = sum of:
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
  20. Quoniam, L.: Bibliometric law used for information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.0074881846 = product of:
      0.022464553 = sum of:
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 1162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=1162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Zipf's law was used to qualify all the key words of documents in a data set. This qualification was used to build a graphical representation of the resulting indicator in each document. The graphical resolution leads to a document dispatch in a 3 dimensional space. This graphical representation was used as an information retrieval tool without using any keyword. The presentation of a case study is available on the WWW. The graph is drawn in VRML allowing a dynamic picture which is linked to a database management system (FreeWAIS)