Search (121 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.06
    0.06228298 = product of:
      0.18684894 = sum of:
        0.18684894 = sum of:
          0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08985821 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09699072 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  2. Vechtomova, O.: Facet-based opinion retrieval from blogs (2010) 0.05
    0.050106924 = product of:
      0.075160384 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents methods of retrieving blog posts containing opinions about an entity expressed in the query. The methods use a lexicon of subjective words and phrases compiled from manually and automatically developed resources. One of the methods uses the Kullback-Leibler divergence to weight subjective words occurring near query terms in documents, another uses proximity between the occurrences of query terms and subjective words in documents, and the third combines both factors. Methods of structuring queries into facets, facet expansion using Wikipedia, and a facet-based retrieval are also investigated in this work. The methods were evaluated using the TREC 2007 and 2008 Blog track topics, and proved to be highly effective.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.71-88
  3. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.04
    0.042948794 = product of:
      0.06442319 = sum of:
        0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045167856 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.450-451 (R.R. Larson); Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  4. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.04
    0.036639772 = product of:
      0.054959655 = sum of:
        0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037639882 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
        0.017319772 = product of:
          0.034639545 = sum of:
            0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034639545 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  5. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.03
    0.03114149 = product of:
      0.09342447 = sum of:
        0.09342447 = sum of:
          0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044929106 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849536 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.205-221
  6. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.03
    0.03114149 = product of:
      0.09342447 = sum of:
        0.09342447 = sum of:
          0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044929106 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849536 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.555-572
  7. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.03
    0.026692703 = product of:
      0.08007811 = sum of:
        0.08007811 = sum of:
          0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03851066 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156745 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.2, S.173-190
  8. King, D.W.; Bryant, E.C.: ¬The evaluation of information services and products (1971) 0.03
    0.025093256 = product of:
      0.075279765 = sum of:
        0.075279765 = weight(_text_:resources in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075279765 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Washington : Information resources press
  9. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.03
    0.025093256 = product of:
      0.075279765 = sum of:
        0.075279765 = weight(_text_:resources in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075279765 = score(doc=4300,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
  10. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  11. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.4, S.408-421
  12. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.1, S.2-17
  13. MacCall, S.L.; Cleveland, A.D.; Gibson, I.E.: Outline and preliminary evaluation of the classical digital library model (1999) 0.02
    0.021731397 = product of:
      0.06519419 = sum of:
        0.06519419 = weight(_text_:resources in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06519419 = score(doc=6541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.349276 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing number of networked information resources and services offers unprecedented opportunities for delivering high quality information to the computer desktop of a wide range of individuals. However, currently there is a reliance on a database retrieval model, in which endusers use keywords to search large collections of automatically indexed resources in order to find needed information. As an alternative to the database retrieval model, this paper outlines the classical digital library model, which is derived from traditional practices of library and information science professionals. These practices include the selection and organization of information resources for local populations of users and the integration of advanced information retrieval tools, such as databases and the Internet into these collections. To evaluate this model, library and information professionals and endusers involved with primary care medicine were asked to respond to a series of questions comparing their experiences with a digital library developed for the primary care population to their experiences with general Internet use. Preliminary results are reported
  14. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.02
    0.021731397 = product of:
      0.06519419 = sum of:
        0.06519419 = weight(_text_:resources in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06519419 = score(doc=3868,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.349276 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
  15. Crawford, G.A.: Varieties of access : a comparison of databases via Z39.50, FirstSearch and CD-ROM (1996) 0.02
    0.020074604 = product of:
      0.06022381 = sum of:
        0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022381 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    3 versions of 2 databases were used as examples for examining indexing, printing/downloading capabilities, and interface design in order to provide the most useful resources to the faculty, staff, and students of Penn State Harrisburg. The databases studied were ABI/Inform and PAIS available using a Z39.50 interface from the library's OPAC, FirstSearch from OCLC, and CD-ROMs from UMI and SilverPlatter
  16. Hirsh, S.G.: Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources (1999) 0.02
    0.017743612 = product of:
      0.053230833 = sum of:
        0.053230833 = weight(_text_:resources in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053230833 = score(doc=4297,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28518265 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores the relevance criteria and search strategies elementary school children applied when searching for information related to a class assignment in a school library setting. Students were interviewed on 2 occasions at different stages of the research process; field observations involved students thinking aloud to explain their search proceses and shadowing as students moved around the school library. Students performed searches on an online catalog, an electronic encyclopedia, an electronic magazine index, and the WWW. Results are presented for children selecting the topic, conducting the search, examining the results, and extracting relevant results. A total of 254 mentions of relevance criteria were identified, including 197 references to textual relevance criteria that were coded into 9 categories and 57 references to graphical relevance criteria that were coded into 5 categories. Students exhibited little concern for the authority of the textual and graphical information they found, based the majority of their relevance decisions for textual material on topicality, and identified information they found interesting. Students devoted a large portion of their research time to find pictures. Understanding the ways that children use electronic resources and the relevance criteria they apply has implications for information literacy training and for systems design
  17. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.02
    0.017565278 = product of:
      0.052695833 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.377-391
  18. Munoz, A.M.; Munoz, F.A.: Nuevas areas de conocimiento y la problematica documental : la prospectiva de la paz en la Universidad de Granada (1997) 0.02
    0.017565278 = product of:
      0.052695833 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a study from the user's point of view, investigating the facility with which bibliographical material can be identified in a multidisciplinary field, the prospective for peace, from the University's resources. Searches (uniterm and relational) were effected using all available tools - OPACs, CD-ROM collections, online databases, manual catalogues, the Internet - both on the University's system and on national research institutions. Overall results returned a low rate of pertinence (1,86%). This is due not to lack of user search expertise but the lack of subject specific indexing coupled with using a MARC format
  19. Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990) 0.02
    0.01711585 = product of:
      0.05134755 = sum of:
        0.05134755 = product of:
          0.1026951 = sum of:
            0.1026951 = weight(_text_:management in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1026951 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.503-510
  20. Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976) 0.02
    0.01711585 = product of:
      0.05134755 = sum of:
        0.05134755 = product of:
          0.1026951 = sum of:
            0.1026951 = weight(_text_:management in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1026951 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375

Years

Languages

  • e 112
  • d 6
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 112
  • m 4
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…