Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.10
    0.09741354 = product of:
      0.14612031 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.09342447 = sum of:
          0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044929106 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849536 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  2. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02
    0.01616512 = product of:
      0.04849536 = sum of:
        0.04849536 = product of:
          0.09699072 = sum of:
            0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09699072 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  3. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004) 0.01
    0.014194889 = product of:
      0.042584665 = sum of:
        0.042584665 = weight(_text_:resources in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042584665 = score(doc=2615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.22814612 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
  4. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.01306339 = product of:
      0.03919017 = sum of:
        0.03919017 = product of:
          0.07838034 = sum of:
            0.07838034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07838034 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.011546515 = product of:
      0.034639545 = sum of:
        0.034639545 = product of:
          0.06927909 = sum of:
            0.06927909 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06927909 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  6. Bodenreider, O.; Bean, C.A.: Relationships among knowledge structures : vocabulary integration within a subject domain (2001) 0.01
    0.008557925 = product of:
      0.025673775 = sum of:
        0.025673775 = product of:
          0.05134755 = sum of:
            0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05134755 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  7. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01
    0.00808256 = product of:
      0.02424768 = sum of:
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  8. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01
    0.00808256 = product of:
      0.02424768 = sum of:
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Zhou, G.D.; Zhang, M.: Extracting relation information from text documents by exploring various types of knowledge (2007) 0.01
    0.007564209 = product of:
      0.022692626 = sum of:
        0.022692626 = product of:
          0.045385253 = sum of:
            0.045385253 = weight(_text_:management in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045385253 = score(doc=927,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Extracting semantic relationships between entities from text documents is challenging in information extraction and important for deep information processing and management. This paper investigates the incorporation of diverse lexical, syntactic and semantic knowledge in feature-based relation extraction using support vector machines. Our study illustrates that the base phrase chunking information is very effective for relation extraction and contributes to most of the performance improvement from syntactic aspect while current commonly used features from full parsing give limited further enhancement. This suggests that most of useful information in full parse trees for relation extraction is shallow and can be captured by chunking. This indicates that a cheap and robust solution in relation extraction can be achieved without decreasing too much in performance. We also demonstrate how semantic information such as WordNet, can be used in feature-based relation extraction to further improve the performance. Evaluation on the ACE benchmark corpora shows that effective incorporation of diverse features enables our system outperform previously best-reported systems. It also shows that our feature-based system significantly outperforms tree kernel-based systems. This suggests that current tree kernels fail to effectively explore structured syntactic information in relation extraction.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.4, S.969-982
  10. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.007564209 = product of:
      0.022692626 = sum of:
        0.022692626 = product of:
          0.045385253 = sum of:
            0.045385253 = weight(_text_:management in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045385253 = score(doc=2497,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  11. Green, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge : an overview (2001) 0.01
    0.0074881846 = product of:
      0.022464553 = sum of:
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  12. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01
    0.0069279084 = product of:
      0.020783724 = sum of:
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  14. Neelameghan, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, multilingual databases in the spiritual and religious domains : the OM Information service (2001) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=1146,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  15. Milstead, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms (2001) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  16. Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  17. Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  18. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01
    0.0057732575 = product of:
      0.017319772 = sum of:
        0.017319772 = product of:
          0.034639545 = sum of:
            0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034639545 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  19. Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.01
    0.005348703 = product of:
      0.016046109 = sum of:
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
  20. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.01
    0.005348703 = product of:
      0.016046109 = sum of:
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3