Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.13
    0.13169447 = product of:
      0.19754168 = sum of:
        0.14904633 = weight(_text_:resources in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14904633 = score(doc=2900,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.79851145 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
        0.04849536 = product of:
          0.09699072 = sum of:
            0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09699072 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.4, S.227-242
  2. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.11
    0.1066045 = product of:
      0.15990674 = sum of:
        0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063876994 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.09602976 = sum of:
          0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054462306 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156745 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.4, S.293-304
  3. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.09
    0.087614626 = product of:
      0.13142194 = sum of:
        0.11063821 = weight(_text_:resources in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11063821 = score(doc=2603,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.592741 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 57(2013) no.2, S.100-117
  4. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.08
    0.08349731 = product of:
      0.12524596 = sum of:
        0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045167856 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.08007811 = sum of:
          0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03851066 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156745 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.4, S.250-265
  5. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.08
    0.07525398 = product of:
      0.11288096 = sum of:
        0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08516933 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.14-18
  6. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.08
    0.07525398 = product of:
      0.11288096 = sum of:
        0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08516933 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.10-15
  7. Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005) 0.07
    0.06601117 = product of:
      0.09901675 = sum of:
        0.078233026 = weight(_text_:resources in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078233026 = score(doc=122,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.4191312 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.3, S.175-188
  8. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.07
    0.06584723 = product of:
      0.09877084 = sum of:
        0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074523166 = score(doc=128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.40-48
  9. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.07
    0.06584723 = product of:
      0.09877084 = sum of:
        0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074523166 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
  10. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.06
    0.058623634 = product of:
      0.08793545 = sum of:
        0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022381 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.27-31
  11. El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003) 0.06
    0.05726506 = product of:
      0.08589759 = sum of:
        0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022381 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
        0.025673775 = product of:
          0.05134755 = sum of:
            0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05134755 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.
  12. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.06
    0.05644048 = product of:
      0.08466072 = sum of:
        0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063876994 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
  13. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.05
    0.05129568 = product of:
      0.07694352 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.xx-xx
  14. Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005) 0.05
    0.05129568 = product of:
      0.07694352 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.02424768 = product of:
          0.04849536 = sum of:
            0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04849536 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.49-56
  15. Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006) 0.04
    0.04396772 = product of:
      0.06595158 = sum of:
        0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045167856 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.42-57
  16. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.04
    0.04396772 = product of:
      0.06595158 = sum of:
        0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045167856 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
        0.020783724 = product of:
          0.04156745 = sum of:
            0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156745 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.4, S.233-249
  17. Kirkland, L.N.: Resources for catalogers : an annotated bibliography (2005) 0.03
    0.028389778 = product of:
      0.08516933 = sum of:
        0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08516933 = score(doc=5716,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considerable documentation, tools, and manuals are available to aid catalogers, but without some guidance, many have no idea how to use these shelves of reference guides and manuals. This bibliography is intended as a guide to the information and resources available to assist the cataloger in cataloging. The availability of each resource is given (including online availability), along with a brief summary of the type of information that each resource contains.