-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.12
0.12313089 = product of:
0.18469633 = sum of:
0.09127186 = weight(_text_:resources in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09127186 = score(doc=2600,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.48898637 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.09342447 = sum of:
0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044929106 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.155-170
-
Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013)
0.09
0.087614626 = product of:
0.13142194 = sum of:
0.11063821 = weight(_text_:resources in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11063821 = score(doc=2603,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.592741 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 57(2013) no.2, S.100-117
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.07
0.06584723 = product of:
0.09877084 = sum of:
0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074523166 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
-
Jones, E.: RDA and serials cataloguing (2013)
0.07
0.06533748 = product of:
0.09800622 = sum of:
0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08516933 = score(doc=2088,freq=16.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.0128368875 = product of:
0.025673775 = sum of:
0.025673775 = weight(_text_:management in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025673775 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this manual, expert cataloguer Ed Jones shows you how to catalogue serials using the new cataloguing standard, RDA: Resource Description and Access. Serials and continuing resources present a variety of unique challenges in bibliographic management, from special issues and unnumbered supplements to recording the changes that a long-running periodical can experience over time. Easing cataloguers through the RDA: Resource Description and Access transition by showing the continuity with past practice, serials cataloguing expert Jones frames the practice within the structure of the FRBR and FRAD conceptual models on which RDA is based. With serials' special considerations in mind, this essential guide explains the familiarities and differences between AACR2 and RDA and demonstrates how serials cataloguers' work fits in the cooperative context of OCLC, CONSER and NACO. Jones looks in detail at the process of cataloguing serials and ongoing integrating resources using RDA, from attributes and relationships between works to identifying related entities. Finally, looking at the possibilities offered by Linked Data, he presents examples of how RDA records can ultimately engage with the Semantic Web.
- Content
- Introduction to serials and serials cataloguing - Getting to know RDA: changes from AACR2 - Searching and the universe of serials - Cataloguing serials and ongoing integrating resources using RDA - General instructions relating to serials cataloguing using RDA and MARC 21 - Attributes of resources (Manifestations and Items and the Works and Expressions they embody) - Relationships between resources - Identifying Works and Expressions - Identifying related entities - Online serials and CONSER provider-neutral records - Ongoing integrating resources - RDA and Linked Data
- LCSH
- Cataloging of integrating resources
- Subject
- Cataloging of integrating resources
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Nakano, H.; Langford, G.; Shelton, T.; Lundgren, J.; O'Dell, A.J.: Managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources (2017)
0.06
0.06465848 = product of:
0.09698772 = sum of:
0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074523166 = score(doc=5160,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
0.022464553 = product of:
0.044929106 = sum of:
0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044929106 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents a case study of quality management issues for electronic resource metadata to assess the support of user tasks (find, select, and obtain library resources) and potential for increased efficiencies in acquisitions and cataloging workflows. The authors evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records (mostly vendor supplied) for e-resource collections as compared with records for the same collections in OCLC's WorldShare Collection Manager (WCM). Findings are that WCM records better support user tasks by containing more summaries and tables of contents; other checkpoints are largely comparable between the two source record groups. The transition to WCM records is discussed.
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016)
0.06
0.060738765 = product of:
0.09110814 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=2948,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
0.027231153 = product of:
0.054462306 = sum of:
0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054462306 = score(doc=2948,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RDA Resource Description and Access are guidelines for description and access to resources designed for digital environment and released, in its first version, in 2010. RDA is based on FRBR and its derived models, that focus on users' needs and on resources of any kind of content, medium and carrier. The paper discusses relevance of main features of RDA for the future role of libraries in the context of semantic web and metadata creation and exchange. The paper aims to highlight many consequences deriving from RDA being a content standard, and in particular the change from record management to data management, differences among the two functions realized by RDA (to identify and to relate entities) and functions realized by other standard such as MARC21 (to archive data) and ISB (to visualize data) and show how, as all these functions are necessary for the catalog, RDA needs to be integrated by other rules and standard and that these tools allow the fulfilment of the variation principle defined by S.R. Ranganathan.
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=4199,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
-
Sapon-White, R.: E-book cataloging workflows at Oregon State University (2014)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=2604,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=2604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Among the many issues associated with integrating e-books into library collections and services, the revision of existing workflows in cataloging units has received little attention. The experience designing new workflows for e-books at Oregon State University Libraries since 2008 is described in detail from the perspective of three different sources of e-books. These descriptions highlight where the workflows applied to each vendor's stream differ. A workflow was developed for each vendor, based on the quality and source of available bibliographic records and the staff member performing the task. Involving cataloging staff as early as possible in the process of purchasing e-books from a new vendor ensures that a suitable workflow can be designed and implemented as soon as possible. This ensures that the representation of e-books in the library catalog is not delayed, increasing the likelihood that users will readily find and use these resources that the library has purchased.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.2, S.127-136
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.06
0.05644048 = product of:
0.08466072 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=2946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012)
0.05
0.054015677 = product of:
0.081023514 = sum of:
0.053230833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053230833 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28518265 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.027792677 = product of:
0.055585355 = sum of:
0.055585355 = weight(_text_:management in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055585355 = score(doc=2086,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
- RSWK
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
- Subject
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.122-126
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.3, S.124-137
-
Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.2, S.111-126
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.4, S.187-199
-
Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016)
0.05
0.05129568 = product of:
0.07694352 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
- Date
- 21. 1.2016 19:08:22
-
Parent, M.: Implementing RDA in a time of change : RDA and system migration at RMIT University (2014)
0.05
0.050106924 = product of:
0.075160384 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
0.022464553 = product of:
0.044929106 = sum of:
0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044929106 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Australia was among national libraries who implemented Resource Description and Access (RDA) in early 2013. RMIT University in Melbourne chose to implement with the National Library, despite an upcoming migration from a Voyager Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) to Alma library services platform. This article describes the experience of RMIT in implementing RDA while also investing resources in a systems change. It addresses staff training, policy development, and processes to automate the conversion of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) records. It includes lessons learned as advice to institutions who have yet to implement RDA.
-
Mitchell, A.M.; Thompson, J.M.; Wu, A.: Agile cataloging : staffing and skills for a bibliographic future (2010)
0.05
0.048266005 = product of:
0.072399005 = sum of:
0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045167856 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
0.027231153 = product of:
0.054462306 = sum of:
0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054462306 = score(doc=4159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- One of the foremost challenges facing technical services in academic libraries is integrating digital resources and services with existing work without a concomitant personnel expansion. The library's bibliographic data are manipulated and delivered through myriad systems and services, including proxy servers, electronic resource management systems, federated search and link resolver tools, integrated library systems, bibliographic utilities, and dozens of external data providers. In this increasingly complex environment, libraries require flexible data management and flexible staffing, which in turn relies on a reservoir of informed staff and managers who understand the many pieces of the technical services puzzle. This article discusses efforts at the University of Houston Libraries, a mid-size research library, to enhance organizational capacity for evolving cataloging roles and to foster organizational relationships that support progress in technical services functions.
