Search (585 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.11
    0.113499895 = product of:
      0.22699979 = sum of:
        0.22699979 = sum of:
          0.12797703 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12797703 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09902276 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  5. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  6. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.09
    0.08645517 = product of:
      0.17291033 = sum of:
        0.17291033 = sum of:
          0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07388757 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09902276 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.08
    0.075497255 = product of:
      0.15099451 = sum of:
        0.15099451 = sum of:
          0.09441008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09441008 = score(doc=217,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval / Terminologische Kontrolle
    Subject
    Information Retrieval / Terminologische Kontrolle
    Information retrieval
  8. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.07
    0.072684124 = product of:
      0.14536825 = sum of:
        0.14536825 = sum of:
          0.07463771 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07463771 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
  9. Walker, S.: ¬The Okapi online catalogue research projects (1989) 0.06
    0.06175369 = product of:
      0.12350738 = sum of:
        0.12350738 = sum of:
          0.052776836 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052776836 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 11:22:08
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.424-435.
  10. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.06
    0.06175369 = product of:
      0.12350738 = sum of:
        0.12350738 = sum of:
          0.052776836 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052776836 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  11. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.06
    0.061699476 = product of:
      0.12339895 = sum of:
        0.12339895 = sum of:
          0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07388757 = score(doc=5001,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  12. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.06
    0.056749947 = product of:
      0.113499895 = sum of:
        0.113499895 = sum of:
          0.063988514 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063988514 = score(doc=2509,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.05
    0.052885264 = product of:
      0.10577053 = sum of:
        0.10577053 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=1637,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
  14. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.05
    0.049402952 = product of:
      0.098805904 = sum of:
        0.098805904 = sum of:
          0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042221468 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  15. Smith, L.C.: "Wholly new forms of encyclopedias" : electronic knowledge in the form of hypertext (1989) 0.05
    0.049402952 = product of:
      0.098805904 = sum of:
        0.098805904 = sum of:
          0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042221468 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The history of encyclopedias and wholly new forms of encyclopedias are briefly reviewed. The possibilities and problems that hypertext presents as a basis for new forms of encyclopedias are explored. The capabilities of current systems, both experimental and commercially available, are outlined, focusing on new possibilities for authoring and design and for reading the retrieval. Examples of applications already making use of hypertext are given.
    Date
    7. 1.1996 22:47:52
  16. Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988) 0.04
    0.043227583 = product of:
      0.08645517 = sum of:
        0.08645517 = sum of:
          0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036943786 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:07
  17. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.04
    0.037052214 = product of:
      0.07410443 = sum of:
        0.07410443 = sum of:
          0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0316661 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04
    0.035365272 = product of:
      0.070730545 = sum of:
        0.070730545 = product of:
          0.14146109 = sum of:
            0.14146109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14146109 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  19. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.04
    0.035365272 = product of:
      0.070730545 = sum of:
        0.070730545 = product of:
          0.14146109 = sum of:
            0.14146109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14146109 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  20. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.04
    0.035365272 = product of:
      0.070730545 = sum of:
        0.070730545 = product of:
          0.14146109 = sum of:
            0.14146109 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14146109 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27

Languages

  • e 445
  • d 131
  • m 5
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 479
  • m 54
  • s 36
  • d 9
  • r 4
  • h 3
  • u 3
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications