Search (3600 results, page 1 of 180)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Petry, W.; Werner, H.-J.: Anwendertraum: Kommunikations- und Retrieval-Software im Vergleich (1993) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cogito. 9(1993) H.2, S.18-22
  2. Dominich, S.: ¬The interaction-based information retrieval paradigm (1997) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=7782,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7782, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7782)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 7782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=7782,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7782, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  3. Jones, K.S.: Information retrieval and artificial intelligence (1999) 0.10
    0.098805904 = product of:
      0.19761181 = sum of:
        0.19761181 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=2906,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2906, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2906)
          0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 2906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11316887 = score(doc=2906,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2906, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  4. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.09
    0.08800239 = product of:
      0.17600478 = sum of:
        0.17600478 = sum of:
          0.11942034 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11942034 = score(doc=789,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An introduction to the principal generic approaches to information retrieval research with their associated concepts, models and systems, this text is designed to keep the information professional up to date with the major themes and developments that have preoccupied researchers in recent month in relation to textual and documentary retrieval systems.
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval
    Content
    First published 1991 as New horizons in information retrieval
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Subject
    Information retrieval
    Information retrieval
  5. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.09
    0.08645517 = product of:
      0.17291033 = sum of:
        0.17291033 = sum of:
          0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07388757 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
          0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09902276 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Behandelt u.a. verschiedene von Retrieval-Software für CD-ROM Produkte
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
  6. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.09
    0.08645517 = product of:
      0.17291033 = sum of:
        0.17291033 = sum of:
          0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07388757 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09902276 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  7. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.09
    0.08645517 = product of:
      0.17291033 = sum of:
        0.17291033 = sum of:
          0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07388757 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09902276 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  8. Chowdhury, G.G.: Introduction to modern information retrieval (1999) 0.08
    0.08046101 = product of:
      0.16092202 = sum of:
        0.16092202 = sum of:
          0.11848369 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11848369 = score(doc=4902,freq=28.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.7502974 = fieldWeight in 4902, product of:
                5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                  28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4902)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 4902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=4902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: 1. Basic concepts of information retrieval systems, 2. Database technology, 3. Bibliographic formats, 4. Subject analysis and representation, 5. Automatic indexing and file organization, 6. Vocabulary control, 7. Abstracts and abstracting, 8. Searching and retrieval, 9. Users of information retrieval, 10. Evaluation of information retrieval systems, 11. Evaluation experiments, 12. Online information retrieval, 13. CD-ROM information retrieval, 14. Trends in CD-ROM and online information retrieval, 15. Multimedia information retrieval, 16. Hypertext and hypermedia systems, 17. Intelligent information retrieval, 18. Natural language processing and information retrieval, 19. Natural language interfaces, 20. Natural language text processing and retrieval systems, 21. Problems and prospects of natural language processing systems, 22. The Internet and information retrieval, 23. Trends in information retrieval.
  9. Bovey, J.D.: Event-based personal retrieval (1996) 0.08
    0.08000275 = product of:
      0.1600055 = sum of:
        0.1600055 = sum of:
          0.103421055 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.103421055 = score(doc=7704,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 7704, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7704)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 7704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=7704,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7704, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    People who work in a research, academic or business environemtn often have personal information collections which are large enough to need retrieval aids. A major difference between personal information retrieval and standard information retrieval is that the items to be retrieved are often associated with events in the searcher's life and ca be retrieved by their relationship of other events as well as by content. Describes the background to evenet based retrieval and describes a prototype graphical event based retrieval system, developed at Kent University, UK, employing the hive event browser
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.357-366
  10. Jaenecke, P.: Wozu Wissensorganisation? (1995) 0.07
    0.07410443 = product of:
      0.14820886 = sum of:
        0.14820886 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=1121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
          0.08487666 = weight(_text_:22 in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08487666 = score(doc=1121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-35
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
  11. Lundquist, C.; Frieder, O.; Holmes, D.O.; Grossman, D.: ¬A parallel relational database management system approach to relevance feedback in information retrieval (1999) 0.07
    0.07410443 = product of:
      0.14820886 = sum of:
        0.14820886 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=4303,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4303, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4303)
          0.08487666 = weight(_text_:22 in 4303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08487666 = score(doc=4303,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4303, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4303)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2000 12:22:18
  12. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.07
    0.07410443 = product of:
      0.14820886 = sum of:
        0.14820886 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.08487666 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08487666 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  13. Sosinska-Kalata, B.: Modele organizacji wiedzy w systemach wyszukiwania informacji o dukumentach (1999) 0.07
    0.07410443 = product of:
      0.14820886 = sum of:
        0.14820886 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=6043,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6043, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6043)
          0.08487666 = weight(_text_:22 in 6043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08487666 = score(doc=6043,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6043, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Übers. des Titels: Models of knowledge organization in documentary information retrieval systems
    Isbn
    83-97629-22-7
  14. InTEXT becomes globally active (1995) 0.07
    0.072684124 = product of:
      0.14536825 = sum of:
        0.14536825 = sum of:
          0.07463771 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07463771 = score(doc=3362,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the range of the text retrieval software from InTEXT Systems, San Francisco, with particular reference to their range of new products based on intelligent, object oriented technology. These developments centre on searching and retrieval over the Internet and the WWW
    Date
    22. 2.1996 10:18:16
  15. Budd, J.M.: ¬The complexity of information retrieval : a hypothetical example (1996) 0.07
    0.072684124 = product of:
      0.14536825 = sum of:
        0.14536825 = sum of:
          0.07463771 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07463771 = score(doc=4928,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=4928,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Inquiries made by academic library users are more complex than they may appear. Successful information retrieval based on complex queries is a function of cataloguing, classification, and the librarian's interpretation. Explores aspects of complexitiy using a proposed query as an example
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.2, S.111-117
  16. Martin, W.J.: ¬The information society (1995) 0.07
    0.072684124 = product of:
      0.14536825 = sum of:
        0.14536825 = sum of:
          0.07463771 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07463771 = score(doc=1201,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
          0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070730545 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2002 14:22:55
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
  17. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.07
    0.07051369 = product of:
      0.14102738 = sum of:
        0.14102738 = sum of:
          0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084442936 = score(doc=6971,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056584436 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Reuters test collection, which at 22.173 references is significantly larger than most traditional test collections. In addition, Reuters has none of the recall calculation problems normally associated with some of the larger test collections available. Explains the method derived by D.D. Lewis to perform retrieval experiments on the Reuters collection and illustrates the use of the Reuters collection using some simple retrieval experiments that compare the performance of stemming algorithms
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  18. Latham, S.J.: Beyond Boolean logic : probabilistic approaches to text retrieval (1991) 0.07
    0.066060096 = product of:
      0.13212019 = sum of:
        0.13212019 = sum of:
          0.08260882 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08260882 = score(doc=3117,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Text retrieval systems in use today are predominantly based on Boolean techniques. Search statements consisting of search terms and Boolean operators are matches against an inverted file to retrieve a set of records for full display. This approach to text retrieval has a number of limitations which may be overcome by presenting a set of documents ranked in order of their degree of similarity to the search statement. Such probabilistic techniques have not yet been incorporated into commercially available products on a large scale. This is due to inertia among users and producers and results from the nature of the market for text retrieval systems. Probabilistic techniques are likely to play an increasingly important part in text retrieval systems in the future
    Source
    Law librarian. 22(1991) no.3, S.157-163
  19. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.07
    0.066060096 = product of:
      0.13212019 = sum of:
        0.13212019 = sum of:
          0.08260882 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08260882 = score(doc=3368,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The performance of an information retrieval or text and media filtering system may be determined through analytic methods as well as by traditional simulation or experimental methods. These analytic methods can provide precise statements about expected performance. They can thus determine which of 2 similarly performing systems is superior. For both a single query terms and for a multiple query term retrieval model, a model for comparing the performance of different probabilistic retrieval methods is developed. This method may be used in computing the average search length for a query, given only knowledge of database parameter values. Describes predictive models for inverse document frequency, binary independence, and relevance feedback based retrieval and filtering. Simulation illustrate how the single term model performs and sample performance predictions are given for single term and multiple term problems
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  20. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.07
    0.066060096 = product of:
      0.13212019 = sum of:
        0.13212019 = sum of:
          0.08260882 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08260882 = score(doc=6958,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04951138 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3075
  • m 240
  • s 183
  • el 61
  • r 53
  • x 18
  • i 16
  • b 10
  • ? 8
  • p 8
  • d 6
  • n 6
  • au 1
  • fi 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications