Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

Losee, R.M.: ¬The science of information : measurement and applications (1990) 0.02

0.021487473 = product of:
  0.08594989 = sum of:
    0.08594989 = weight(_text_:science in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08594989 = score(doc=813,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.6984763 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

COMPASS: Information science
Series: Library and information science
Subject: Information science

Losee, R.M.; Paris, L.A.H.: Measuring search-engine quality and query difficulty : ranking with Target and Freestyle (1999) 0.01

0.010743736 = product of:
  0.042974945 = sum of:
    0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042974945 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.882-889

Losee, R.M.: Seven fundamental questions for the science of library classification (1993) 0.01

0.0101292925 = product of:
  0.04051717 = sum of:
    0.04051717 = weight(_text_:science in 4508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04051717 = score(doc=4508,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 4508, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4508)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: For classification to advance to the point where optimal systems may be developed for manual or automated use, it will be necessary for a science of document or library classification to be developed. Seven questions are posed which the author feels must be answered before such optimal systems can be developed. Suggestions are made as to the forms that answers to these questions might take

Losee, R.M.; Haas, S.W.: Sublanguage terms : dictionaries, usage, and automatic classification (1995) 0.01
```
0.0101292925 = product of:
  0.04051717 = sum of:
    0.04051717 = weight(_text_:science in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04051717 = score(doc=2650,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The use of terms from natural and social science titles and abstracts is studied from the perspective of sublanguages and their specialized dictionaries. Explores different notions of sublanguage distinctiveness. Object methods for separating hard and soft sciences are suggested based on measures of sublanguage use, dictionary characteristics, and sublanguage distinctiveness. Abstracts were automatically classified with a high degree of accuracy by using a formula that condsiders the degree of uniqueness of terms in each sublanguage. This may prove useful for text filtering of information retrieval systems

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.7, S.519-529

Spink, A.; Losee, R.M.: Feedback in information retrieval (1996) 0.01

0.0071624913 = product of:
  0.028649965 = sum of:
    0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 7441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028649965 = score(doc=7441,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7441, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7441)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.33-78

Losee, R.M.: ¬A discipline independent definition of information (1997) 0.01

0.0071624913 = product of:
  0.028649965 = sum of:
    0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028649965 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.3, S.254-269

Losee, R.M.: ¬A Gray code based ordering for documents on shelves : classification for browsing and retrieval (1992) 0.01

0.0062671797 = product of:
  0.025068719 = sum of:
    0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025068719 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992) no.4, S.312-322

Losee, R.M.: Comparing Boolean and probabilistic information retrieval systems across queries and disciplines (1997) 0.01

0.0062671797 = product of:
  0.025068719 = sum of:
    0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 7709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025068719 = score(doc=7709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 7709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7709)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.2, S.143-156

Losee, R.M.: When information retrieval measures agree about the relative quality of document rankings (2000) 0.01

0.0062671797 = product of:
  0.025068719 = sum of:
    0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025068719 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.9, S.834-840

Losee, R.M.; Church Jr., L.: Are two document clusters better than one? : the cluster performance question for information retrieval (2005) 0.01

0.0062671797 = product of:
  0.025068719 = sum of:
    0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025068719 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.106-108

Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.01

0.0055381064 = product of:
  0.022152426 = sum of:
    0.022152426 = product of:
      0.04430485 = sum of:
        0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430485 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 22. 2.1996 13:14:10

Losee, R.M.: Evaluating retrieval performance given database and query characteristics : analytic determination of performance surfaces (1996) 0.01

0.005371868 = product of:
  0.021487473 = sum of:
    0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021487473 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.95-105

Losee, R.M.: Term dependence : a basis for Luhn and Zipf models (2001) 0.01

0.005371868 = product of:
  0.021487473 = sum of:
    0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 6976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021487473 = score(doc=6976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 6976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6976)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1019-1025

Losee, R.M.: ¬The effect of assigning a metadata or indexing term on document ordering (2013) 0.01

0.005371868 = product of:
  0.021487473 = sum of:
    0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021487473 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2191-2200

Willis, C.; Losee, R.M.: ¬A random walk on an ontology : using thesaurus structure for automatic subject indexing (2013) 0.00

0.0035812457 = product of:
  0.014324983 = sum of:
    0.014324983 = weight(_text_:science in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014324983 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0467152 = queryNorm
        0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1330-1344

Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes