Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Salton, G."
  1. Salton, G.: Historical note: the past thirty years in information retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.014324983 = product of:
      0.05729993 = sum of:
        0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05729993 = score(doc=3910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 38(1987) no.5, S.375-380
  2. Salton, G.; Fox, E.A.; Voorhees, E.: Advanced feedback methods in information retrieval (1985) 0.01
    0.014324983 = product of:
      0.05729993 = sum of:
        0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 5445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05729993 = score(doc=5445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 5445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5445)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985), S.200-210
  3. Salton, G.: Automated language processing (1968) 0.01
    0.014324983 = product of:
      0.05729993 = sum of:
        0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05729993 = score(doc=233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.137-168
  4. Salton, G.: ¬A new comparison between conventional indexing (MEDLARS) and automatic text processing (SMART) (1972) 0.01
    0.0125343595 = product of:
      0.050137438 = sum of:
        0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050137438 = score(doc=2325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1972), S.75-84
  5. Salton, G.; Allen, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine-readable data (1994) 0.01
    0.0125343595 = product of:
      0.050137438 = sum of:
        0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050137438 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Science. 264(1994) no.5164, S.1421-1426
  6. Salton, G.: Automatic text processing : the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer (1989) 0.01
    0.008953114 = product of:
      0.035812456 = sum of:
        0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 1307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035812456 = score(doc=1307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1307)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Addison-Wesley series in computer science
  7. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994) 0.01
    0.008953114 = product of:
      0.035812456 = sum of:
        0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035812456 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Science. 264(1994), S.1421-1426
  8. Wong, S.K.M.; Yao, Y.Y.; Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Evaluation of an adaptive linear model (1991) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991) no.10, S.723-730
  9. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback (1990) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.288-297
  10. Salton, G.: ¬A note about information science research (1997) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Approaches to global text analysis (1990) 0.01
    0.0062671797 = product of:
      0.025068719 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000, from research to applications. Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Toronto, Canada, 4.-8.11.1990. Ed. by Diana Henderson
  12. Salton, G.: Mathematics and information retrieval (1979) 0.01
    0.0062671797 = product of:
      0.025068719 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 5467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=5467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5467)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The development of a given discipline in science and technology often depends on the availability of theorie capable of describing the processes which control the field and of modelling the interactions between the processes. The absence of an accepted theory of information retrieval has benn blamed for the relative disorder and the lack of technical advances in the area. The main mathematical approaches to information retrieval are examined in this study, including both algebraic and probabilistic models, and the difficulties which impede the formalization of information retrieval processes are described. A number of developments are covered where new theoretical understandings have directly led to the improvemenet of retrieval techniques and operations
  13. Salton, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents (1985) 0.01
    0.0050646462 = product of:
      0.020258585 = sum of:
        0.020258585 = weight(_text_:science in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020258585 = score(doc=3650,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The attempt to computerize a process, such as indexing, abstracting, classifying, or retrieving information, begins with an analysis of the process into its intellectual and nonintellectual components. That part of the process which is amenable to computerization is mechanical or algorithmic. What is not is intellectual or creative and requires human intervention. Gerard Salton has been an innovator, experimenter, and promoter in the area of mechanized information systems since the early 1960s. He has been particularly ingenious at analyzing the process of information retrieval into its algorithmic components. He received a doctorate in applied mathematics from Harvard University before moving to the computer science department at Cornell, where he developed a prototype automatic retrieval system called SMART. Working with this system he and his students contributed for over a decade to our theoretical understanding of the retrieval process. On a more practical level, they have contributed design criteria for operating retrieval systems. The following selection presents one of the early descriptions of the SMART system; it is valuable as it shows the direction automatic retrieval methods were to take beyond simple word-matching techniques. These include various word normalization techniques to improve recall, for instance, the separation of words into stems and affixes; the correlation and clustering, using statistical association measures, of related terms; and the identification, using a concept thesaurus, of synonymous, broader, narrower, and sibling terms. They include, as weIl, techniques, both linguistic and statistical, to deal with the thorny problem of how to automatically extract from texts index terms that consist of more than one word. They include weighting techniques and various documentrequest matching algorithms. Significant among the latter are those which produce a retrieval output of citations ranked in relevante order. During the 1970s, Salton and his students went an to further refine these various techniques, particularly the weighting and statistical association measures. Many of their early innovations seem commonplace today. Some of their later techniques are still ahead of their time and await technological developments for implementation. The particular focus of the selection that follows is an the evaluation of a particular component of the SMART system, a multilingual thesaurus. By mapping English language expressions and their German equivalents to a common concept number, the thesaurus permitted the automatic processing of German language documents against English language queries and vice versa. The results of the evaluation, as it turned out, were somewhat inconclusive. However, this SMART experiment suggested in a bold and optimistic way how one might proceed to answer such complex questions as What is meant by retrieval language compatability? How it is to be achieved, and how evaluated?
    Footnote
    Original in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21(1970) no.3, S.187-194.