Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"02.13 / Wissenschaftspraxis"
  1. Boerner, K.: Atlas of science : visualizing what we know (2010) 0.07
    0.067029454 = product of:
      0.13405891 = sum of:
        0.06406327 = weight(_text_:science in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06406327 = score(doc=3359,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
        0.069995634 = sum of:
          0.044678576 = weight(_text_:history in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044678576 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.20559052 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
          0.02531706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02531706 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cartographic maps have guided our explorations for centuries, allowing us to navigate the world. Science maps have the potential to guide our search for knowledge in the same way, helping us navigate, understand, and communicate the dynamic and changing structure of science and technology. Allowing us to visualize scientific results, science maps help us make sense of the avalanche of data generated by scientific research today. Atlas of Science, features more than thirty full-page science maps, fifty data charts, a timeline of science-mapping milestones, and 500 color images; it serves as a sumptuous visual index to the evolution of modern science and as an introduction to "the science of science"--charting the trajectory from scientific concept to published results. Atlas of Science, based on the popular exhibit "Places & Spaces: Mapping Science," describes and displays successful mapping techniques. The heart of the book is a visual feast: Claudius Ptolemy's Cosmographia World Map from 1482; a guide to a PhD thesis that resembles a subway map; "the structure of science" as revealed in a map of citation relationships in papers published in 2002; a periodic table; a history flow visualization of the Wikipedia article on abortion; a globe showing the worldwide distribution of patents; a forecast of earthquake risk; hands-on science maps for kids; and many more. Each entry includes the story behind the map and biographies of its makers. Not even the most brilliant minds can keep up with today's deluge of scientific results. Science maps show us the landscape of what we know. Exhibition Ongoing National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. The Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance, Bonn, Germany Storm Hall, San Diego State College
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:16
    LCSH
    Communication in science
    Science
    Subject
    Communication in science
    Science
  2. Willinsky, J.: ¬The access principle : the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006) 0.02
    0.015934141 = product of:
      0.031868283 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=298,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
        0.013962056 = product of:
          0.027924111 = sum of:
            0.027924111 = weight(_text_:history in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027924111 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.12849407 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    An argument for extending the circulation of knowledge with new publishing technologies considers scholarly, economic, philosophical, and practical issues. Questions about access to scholarship go back farther than recent debates over subscription prices, rights, and electronic archives suggest. The great libraries of the past - from the fabled collection at Alexandria to the early public libraries of nineteenth-century America - stood as arguments for increasing access. In The Access Principle, John Willinsky describes the latest chapter in this ongoing story - online open access publishing by scholarly journals - and makes a case for open access as a public good. A commitment to scholarly work, writes Willinsky, carries with it a responsibility to circulate that work as widely as possible: this is the access principle. In the digital age, that responsibility includes exploring new publishing technologies and economic models to improve access to scholarly work. Wide circulation adds value to published work; it is a significant aspect of its claim to be knowledge. The right to know and the right to be known are inextricably mixed. Open access, argues Willinsky, can benefit both a researcher-author working the best-equipped lab at a leading research university and a teacher struggling to find resources in an impoverished high school. Willinsky describes different types of access - the New England Journal of Medicine, for example, grants open access to issues six months after initial publication, and First Monday forgoes a print edition and makes its contents immediately accessible at no cost. He discusses the contradictions of copyright law, the reading of research, and the economic viability of open access. He also considers broader themes of public access to knowledge, human rights issues, lessons from publishing history, and "epistemological vanities." The debate over open access, writes Willinsky, raises crucial questions about the place of scholarly work in a larger world - and about the future of knowledge.
    LCSH
    Science publishing
    Communication in science
    Subject
    Science publishing
    Communication in science
  3. Wissenschaftskommunikation der Zukunft (WissKom 2007) : 4. Konferenz der Zentralbibliothek Forschungszentrum Jülich : 6. - 8. November 2007 ; Beiträge und Poster / [WissKom 2007]. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek. Rafael Ball (Hrsg.). [Mit einem Festvortrag von Ernst Pöppel] (2007) 0.01
    0.01192514 = product of:
      0.02385028 = sum of:
        0.012661615 = weight(_text_:science in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012661615 = score(doc=4064,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.10289528 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
        0.011188665 = product of:
          0.02237733 = sum of:
            0.02237733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02237733 = score(doc=4064,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Ernst Pöppel: Wissen - und wie es kommuniziert werden kann. - Anne-Katharina Weilenmann: Von Cyberscience zu e-Science. - Katrin Weller, Indra Mainz, Ingo Paulsen, Dominic Mainz: Semantisches und vernetztes Wissensmanagement für Forschung und Wissenschaft. - Ute Rusnak, Matthias Razum, Leni Helmes: Wissensvernetzung im Forschungsprozess. - Elena Semenova, Martin Stricker: Eine Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen. Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums für die Wissenskommunikation. - Peter Haber, Jan Hodel: Historische Fachkommunikation im Wandel. Analysen und Trends. - Lydia Bauer, Nadja Böller, Josef Herget, Sonja Hierl: Konzepte zur Förderung der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Der Churer Ansatz zur Vermittlung von kollaborativen Kompetenzen. - Susanne von liter: Wissenschaftskommunikation in der Entwicklungsforschung/Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Web2.0 und Communities of Practice - ein Beitrag aus der Praxis. - Steffen Leich-Nienhaus: Wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung am modernen digitalen Arbeitsplatz. - Christian Hänger, Christine Krätzsch: Collaborative Tagging als neuer Service von Hochschulbibliotheken. - Christoph Bläsi: Mobile IT in kleinen und mittleren Medienunternehmen zur Prozess- und Serviceverbesserung. - Michael Diepenbroek, Hannes Grobe: PANGAEA® als vernetztes Verlags- und Bibliothekssystem für wissenschaftliche Daten. - Jan Brase, Jens Klump: Zitierfähige Datensätze: Primärdaten-Management durch DOls. - Harald Krottmaier: Die Systemarchitektur von PROBADO: Der allgemeine Zugriff auf Repositorien mit nicht-textuellen Inhalten. - Annette Holtkamp: Open Access Publishing in der Hochenergiephysik: Das SCOAP3 Projekt. - Wiebke Oeltjen: Metadaten-Management mit MyCoRe. - Karin Weishaupt: Open-Access-Zeitschriften als neue Form wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation: Vorbehalte und Vorschläge für Maßnahmen zur Akzeptanzsteigerung. - Wolfgang Glänzel, Koenraad Debackere: Bibliometrie zwischen Forschung und Dienstleistung. - Patrick Vanouplines, Ronald Beullens: Merging information sources to obtain the impact factor of open access journals. - Dirk Tunger: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennungs-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft. - Milos Jovanovic: Indicators for Footprints through science - Designing the Journal Application Level (JAL). - James Pringle: The ISl Web of Knowledge as a Management Tool. - Show-Ling Lee-Müller, Gerd Schumacher: Einsatz bibliometrischer Analysen im EU-Projekt zur Technologiefrüherkennung SMART. - Henning Möller: Messen, Steuern, Regeln - zum Controlling der Helmhoitz-Forschung
    Date
    20. 1.2018 20:22:16
    Footnote
    Die letzten beiden Teile des Kongressbandes behandeln die Möglichkeiten der Bibliometrie zum Handling des sich explosionsartig vermehrenden Wissens sowie der Einsatz solcher Technologien als Trenderkennungssystem. Zuletzt behandelt ein Artikel die Evaluation der Helmholtz-Einrichtungen. Am Schluss befindet sich noch ein sechsseitiges Register, das sehr hilfreich und für einen Kongressband keineswegs selbstverständlich ist. Vielleicht sollte noch auf den als Einleitung abgedruckten, überaus lesenswerten Festvortrag von Ernst Pöppel, Professor für medizinische Psychologie aus München, hingewiesen werden, der die verschiedenen Formen des Wissens allgemeinverständlich aus Sicht der Hirnforschung darstellt. Hervorzuheben ist noch, dass die Publikation kostenlos über den Publikationsserver des FZ Jülich bezogen werden kann, eine Tatsache, die sich offensichtlich nicht herumgesprochen hat, da bei einer Suche über den Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalog (Stand: 22. April 2008) dieses »Exemplar« nicht gefunden wurde. Als höchstes der Gefühle bietet der Südwestverbund bei »elektronische Referenz« einen Link auf das Inhaltsverzeichnis. Vielleicht erbarmt sich pro Verbund jemand und nimmt die elektronische Version auf."
  4. Fleck, L.: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache : Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (1980) 0.01
    0.0075969696 = product of:
      0.030387878 = sum of:
        0.030387878 = weight(_text_:science in 2457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030387878 = score(doc=2457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2457)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Science
    Subject
    Science
  5. Theories of information behavior (2005) 0.00
    0.0035812457 = product of:
      0.014324983 = sum of:
        0.014324983 = weight(_text_:science in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014324983 = score(doc=68,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.303 (D.E. Agosto): "Due to the brevity of the entries, they serve more as introductions to a wide array of theories than as deep explorations of a select few. The individual entries are not as deep as those in more traditional reference volumes, such as The Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (Drake, 2003) or The Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) (Cronin, 2005), but the overall coverage is much broader. This volume is probably most useful to doctoral students who are looking for theoretical frameworks for nascent research projects or to more veteran researchers interested in an introductory overview of information behavior research, as those already familiar with this subfield also will probably already be familiar with most of the theories presented here. Since different authors have penned each of the various entries, the writing styles vary somewhat, but on the whole, this is a readable, pithy volume that does an excellent job of encapsulating this important area of information research."
    LCSH
    Information science
    Subject
    Information science

Languages

Types